Top 5 Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Companies
Guangzhou EHang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
Airbus SE
Archer Aviation Inc.
Volocopter GmbH (Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH)
Joby Aviation, Inc.
Source: Mordor Intelligence
Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Urban Air Mobility (UAM) players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
MI scoring can diverge from revenue based lists because it rewards near term deliverability signals that buyers can observe today. These include certification path clarity, production readiness, partner depth, and evidence of repeatable flight operations. A company can look strong on brand and funding, yet still lag on test cadence or supplier qualification, which pushes execution down. Many leaders separate themselves through three indicators: regulator engagement, factory readiness, and system level partnerships for avionics, flight controls, and training. Buyers also ask which programs have regulator issued approvals already, such as CAAC certificates, and which rely mainly on test plans. They also ask how to judge vertiport dependency, since slow city permitting can block service even after aircraft approval. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is more useful for supplier and competitor evaluation than simple revenue tables because it highlights who can deliver aircraft and services reliably under real rules.
MI Competitive Matrix for Urban Air Mobility (UAM)
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Joby Aviation, Inc.
Manufacturing scale is becoming a tangible differentiator as Joby expands capacity in California and ramps a major Ohio footprint tied to future production certification needs. Joby, a top player, benefits from repeated flight experience and a clear plan to move from prototype output toward industrial cadence. If the FAA pilot training and powered lift rules settle faster than expected, Joby can translate sites and tooling into earlier service launches. The key operational risk is supply chain maturity for high rate builds, since early defects can cascade into certification delays.
Archer Aviation Inc.
Regulatory momentum strengthened when the FAA issued a Special Airworthiness Certificate allowing Midnight to begin flight testing. Archer, a major player, is also investing in repeatable output through its completed Covington, Georgia manufacturing facility, with ramp plans starting in early 2025. If defense and public sector missions expand, Archer can use early fleet utilization to harden maintenance processes and pilot training. The operational risk is compressing tooling, supplier qualification, and certification learning into the same short window, which often drives schedule churn.
BETA Technologies, Inc.
Demonstrated operations are building credibility, including a high visibility passenger carrying all electric flight into the New York area in 2025. Public filings also show tangible industrial intent through documented facilities and staffing growth. If FAA powered lift guidance becomes more standardized for training and maintenance, BETA's charging network and aircraft family approach could broaden use cases beyond medical logistics. The main risk is scaling production quality while sustaining cash burn, since certification programs are unforgiving of rework.
Guangzhou EHang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
China based certification progress is unusually concrete, with the EH216 S receiving a CAAC type certificate in October 2023 and operator certificates emerging in 2025. EHang, a major supplier, can translate these approvals into real utilization learnings, which may become a durable advantage as other regions build their own playbooks. If additional cities allow ticketed operations, EHang can deepen reliability data and improve unit level economics. The critical risk is whether foreign regulators accept CAAC grounded evidence quickly, since validation pathways can still be slow.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should buyers prioritize first when selecting an eVTOL partner?
Start with certification path realism and the specific regulator relationship for your first launch geography. Then confirm production readiness, not just prototype performance.
How do CAAC approvals compare with FAA or EASA pathways for planning service entry?
CAAC approvals can enable earlier controlled operations in China, which creates useful reliability data. Outside China, validation and local operating approvals can still take significant time.
What is the most common reason programs slip after strong prototype results?
Factory and supplier maturity often lag flight testing. Late redesigns driven by certification feedback can also ripple into tooling and training plans.
How can cities reduce noise and acceptance risk for early services?
Use defined corridors, limit hours at first, and publish measured noise data from real flights. Pair early routes with airport shuttles where benefits are easiest to explain.
What should cargo and emergency services look for that passenger operators might ignore?
They should emphasize payload range stability, turnaround time, and dispatch reliability. They should also confirm charging or fueling logistics across multiple bases.
How can buyers verify that "high volume production" claims are credible?
Ask for evidence of installed tooling, supplier qualification status, and quality system audits. A documented ramp plan tied to a specific site is more credible than a generic target.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Evidence was taken from company investor materials, regulatory style announcements, and credible journalism, focusing on 2023 onward. Private firms were scored using observable signals like facilities, certified approvals, and announced test activity. When direct financial segmentation was unavailable, funding events and program continuity were used as practical indicators. Signals were triangulated across multiple sources when possible.
Active sites, test corridors, and launch city planning determine where aircraft can actually be introduced.
Trust with regulators, cities, and operators reduces friction in permitting, training, and public acceptance.
Orders, certified deliveries, and operational approvals act as near term proxies for real adoption.
Factories, supply chain maturity, and maintenance readiness drive repeatability and dispatch reliability.
New aircraft, autonomy steps, and certified subsystems since 2023 show learning speed and technical depth.
Ability to fund multi year testing and certification without pauses lowers schedule risk for customers.
