United States Freight Brokerage Market Size and Share

United States Freight Brokerage Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

United States Freight Brokerage Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The United States Freight Brokerage Market size is estimated at USD 19.68 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 28.17 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 7.44% during the forecast period (2025-2030). Growth momentum is supported by the rapid uptake of digital freight platforms, sustained e-commerce demand, and continued federal investment in infrastructure. Tech-enabled brokers are scaling automation to compress transaction time, while traditional intermediaries look to mergers for scale advantages. Driver shortages and heightened spot-market reliance continue to favor intermediaries that maintain deep carrier networks and real-time pricing engines. At the same time, asset-based carriers are bolting on brokerage desks to protect margins, forcing pure-play brokers to differentiate through specialized compliance, temperature-controlled capacity, or managed-transport contracts. The convergence of predictive analytics, electronic logging data, and venture funding is expected to widen the performance gap between digitally mature and lagging firms, thereby reshaping competitive hierarchies across the United States freight brokerage market. 

Key Report Takeaways

  • By service, Full-Truckload (FTL) led with 63.75% of the United States freight brokerage market share in 2024. The United States freight brokerage market for Less-than-Truckload (LTL) is projected to expand at a 9.0% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By equipment, dry vans commanded a 44.65% of the United States freight brokerage market share in 2024. The United States freight brokerage market for refrigerated trailers is advancing at a 10.1% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By haul length, long-haul lanes held 53.15% of the United States freight brokerage market share in 2024. The United States freight brokerage market for regional routes (100-500 miles) is the fastest-growing at 8.4% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By business model, traditional brokerage accounted for 54.3% of the United States freight brokerage market revenue in 2024. The United States freight brokerage market for digital brokerage is accelerating at 17.0% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By end-user, retail, FMCG & wholesale distribution led with 29.6% of the United States freight brokerage market share in 2024. The United States freight brokerage market for e-commerce & 3PL fulfillment shows the strongest 13.5% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By customer size, large shippers contributed 56.3% of the United States freight brokerage market turnover in 2024. The United States freight brokerage market for small businesses is expected to grow at 10.4% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By geography, the Midwest captured 26.6% of the United States freight brokerage market revenue in 2024. The United States freight brokerage market for the Southwest is forecast to post the highest regional CAGR at 8.2% between 2025-2030.

Segment Analysis

By Service: LTL Gains Momentum in the E-Commerce Era

The United States freight brokerage market size for service lines continues to skew toward FTL, which generated 63.75% of revenue in 2024, yet the LTL corridor is on track for a 9.0% CAGR through 2030. Digital platforms that quote pallet-level rates within seconds are winning volume from manual call-and-fax workflows. The density-based re-classification in July 2025 will reward brokers able to re-engineer packaging dimensions so that shippers avoid higher classes for light bulky products. 

FTL still commands the bulk of long-haul industrial freight, but driver scarcity and equipment constraints are nudging shippers to multistop LTL consolidations. Parcel-to-LTL consolidation hubs reduce last-mile congestion and cut per-unit cost, giving brokers new margins on value-added cross-dock services. Specialized brokers also exploit “partial truckload” offerings to bridge the gap between LTL and FTL. Consequently, multi-service capability is now a benchmark for winning diversified RFPs across the United States freight brokerage market.

Market Analysis of United States Freight Brokerage Market: Chart for Service
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Equipment / Trailer Type: Refrigerated Demand Outpaces Market

Dry vans produced 44.65% of revenue in 2024, but refrigerated units are advancing at 10.1% CAGR, lifting the equipment segment’s United States freight brokerage market size over the forecast horizon. Food-grade and pharmaceutical shippers require temperature verification and electronic seals, favoring brokers with telematics-equipped carrier pools. 

Rising specialty produce exports out of the West Coast elevate back-haul demand for reefers into the Midwest and East. Brokers bundle harmonized temperature monitoring and detention mitigation into premium pricing. Flatbed and step-deck equipment remains cyclical, spiking during spring construction, while tanker brokerage stays niche due to hazmat compliance burdens. Equipment flexibility, therefore, became central to winning multi-modal contracts in 2025.

By Haul Length: Regional Routes Gain Strategic Importance

Long-hauls accounted for 53.15% of 2024 turnover, yet regional lanes are projected to compound at 8.4% CAGR as shippers rebalance inventories closer to demand nodes. Average broker margin on sub-250-mile hauls reaches 15.2% compared with 11.7% on 1,000-mile moves, supporting profitability for specialists in short-haul aggregation. 

Retailers deploying micro-fulfillment centers need high-frequency middle-mile replenishment, creating consistent volume for brokers with dense carrier clusters. Local freight benefits from urban consolidation programs designed to curb emissions. Brokers offering drop-trailer pools and cross-dock transloads are particularly well-positioned, sustaining lane density across the United States freight brokerage market.

By Business Model: Digital Platforms Disrupt Traditional Brokerage

Traditional brokers controlled 54.3% of 2024 gross revenue, but digital models are surging at 17.0% CAGR, signaling a tectonic shift in how loads are sourced and priced. AI tender bots parse emails and spreadsheets, post structured data to carrier marketplaces, and execute automatic counteroffers, shrinking load-coverage time to minutes. 

Asset-based carriers now blend committed capacity with on-demand brokerage to improve asset utilization, complicating value propositions for non-asset firms. The agency model survives in niche geographies where personal relationships trump algorithmic matching. However, multi-tenant SaaS freight platforms are lowering the cost for small brokers to access the same digital rails, preserving competition across the United States freight brokerage market.

By End-User Industry: E-Commerce Reshapes Freight Patterns

Retail, FMCG & wholesale distribution generated 29.6% of 2024 revenue, but e-commerce & 3PL fulfillment is climbing at 13.5% CAGR, enlarging its share of the United States freight brokerage market size. Same-day delivery expectations force omnichannel retailers to split inventory into regional nodes, resulting in more LTL and parcel-consolidation shipments. 

Manufacturing and automotive freight have stabilized as reshoring projects in the Midwest drive steady inbound raw material and outbound component flows. Infrastructure spending renews demand for flatbed moves in the construction segment, while healthcare logistics calls for GDP-certified carriers and detailed chain-of-custody documentation. Brokers with vertical expertise, therefore, earn premium margins by navigating complex regulatory and temperature-controlled requirements.

Market Analysis of US Freight Brokerage Market: Chart for End-User Industry
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Customer Size: Small Businesses Drive Incremental Growth

Large shippers accounted for 56.3% of 2024 revenue, yet small businesses are on a 10.4% CAGR trajectory because digital self-service portals now lower entry barriers. Instant pallet quotes, embedded financing, and mobile status alerts mimic parcel-shipping experiences, drawing micro-shippers toward brokerage solutions. 

Mid-market firms straddle transactional and strategic buying behaviors, demanding both negotiated annual rates and spot flexibility during seasonal surges. Brokers segment account management to tailor SLA levels, using CRM and analytics to identify upsell opportunities in managed transportation. Inclusive platform design thus allows the United States freight brokerage market to broaden its addressable customer base while maintaining service differentiation.

Geography Analysis

The Midwest held 26.6% of 2024 revenue, supported by a dense interstate grid and proximity to automotive, machinery, and agribusiness production clusters. Intermodal ramps in Chicago and Kansas City provide seamless rail-to-truck transfers, sustaining brokerage volumes across dry and refrigerated categories. Robust managed-transport adoption among industrial shippers further cements the region’s leadership within the United States freight brokerage market.

The Southwest is the fastest-growing region at 8.2% CAGR through 2030, buoyed by population inflow, semiconductor plant construction, and cross-border automotive supply chains. Near-shoring to Mexico increases trans-load brokerage in Laredo and El Paso as production parts flow north. While 2024 saw trade softness, rail ramp bottlenecks in Dallas and Phoenix are improving, creating expansion opportunities for brokers aligning with maquiladora schedules.

The West benefits from robust import flows through Los Angeles-Long Beach, Oakland, and Seattle-Tacoma, driving drayage and transcontinental intermodal brokerage. Port automation pilots and expanded chassis pools are expected to ease congestion by 2026, improving schedule reliability. Meanwhile, freight activity in the Southeast tracks housing-starts volatility, and the Northeast contends with retail inventory corrections, giving brokers in those regions variable revenue streams that reward operational agility.

Competitive Landscape

Competition spans global 3PLs, tech-forward start-ups, and asset-light regional specialists. C.H. Robinson maintains category leadership through USD 1 billion in annual technology spend and an AI engine credited with automating more than 3 million transactions. Total Quality Logistics leverages deep carrier relationships for high-service truckload coverage, whereas XPO Logistics continues to specialize in LTL optimization after its 2024 global spin-off.

Consolidation is reshaping market structure. RXO’s USD 1.025 billion purchase of Coyote Logistics from UPS in June 2024 vaulted the firm into the top North American brokerage tier. Radiant Logistics acquired Universal Logistics in May 2025 to bolster oilfield and HVAC project freight, while DP World agreed to buy Unique Logistics International for USD 35.855 million in March 2025, expanding global forwarding reach. 

Start-ups are capturing niche whitespaces. FreightVana’s planned acquisition of Loadsmith’s brokerage arm adds a power-only trailer pool for drop operations. World Group’s March 2025 buyout of Dray Alliance integrates digital drayage scheduling into its ContainerPort network, offering real-time marine terminal visibility. UPS targets USD 20 billion in healthcare logistics revenue by 2026, intensifying vertical competition. Firms that fuse industry expertise with automation are best positioned to protect margins amid volatile fuel and contract cycles in the United States freight brokerage market.

United States Freight Brokerage Industry Leaders

  1. C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.

  2. Total Quality Logistics (TQL)

  3. XPO Logistics Inc.

  4. Echo Global Logistics

  5. Worldwide Express

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
US Freight Brokerage Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • May 2025: Radiant Logistics acquired Universal Logistics, strengthening time-critical air and ocean freight services in oilfield and HVAC verticals.
  • March 2025: Unique Logistics International signed a USD 35.855 million merger agreement with DP World Logistics to expand global freight management reach.
  • December 2024: FreightVana announced plans to buy Loadsmith’s brokerage arm, enlarging its power-only trailer network.
  • June 2024: RXO acquired Coyote Logistics from UPS for USD 1.025 billion, creating one of the largest freight brokerage companies in North America and significantly reshaping the competitive landscape through this major consolidation RXO

Table of Contents for United States Freight Brokerage Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Tight Domestic Truckload Capacity & Driver Shortage Boosting Spot Brokerage Activity
    • 4.2.2 Heightened E-Commerce Parcel Volumes Driving LTL Brokerage Penetration
    • 4.2.3 Shipper Demand for Managed Transportation & 4PL Solutions
    • 4.2.4 Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Mandate Increasing Reliance on Brokers for Compliance-Ready Carriers
    • 4.2.5 Venture-Capital Funding Accelerating Digital Freight-Matching Platforms
    • 4.2.6 Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act (IIJA) Re-energising Construction-Related Freight Flows
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Volatile Diesel Prices Compressing Spot Margin for Brokers
    • 4.3.2 Port Congestion & Chassis Shortages Disrupting Drayage Reliability
    • 4.3.3 Asset-Based Carriers Expanding Direct-to-Shipper Brokerage (Margin Squeeze)
    • 4.3.4 Increasing Federal Scrutiny on Broker Bond Requirements & Fraud Cases
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Key Government Regulations & Initiatives (HOS, AB5, Speed-Limiter NPRM)
  • 4.6 Technology Snapshot (Digital Freight Brokerage, IoT, AI, Visibility APIs)
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.8 US Logistics Industry Overview
  • 4.9 Insights on Spot vs. Contract Truck Rates
  • 4.10 Impact of Geopolitical Events on the Market

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Service
    • 5.1.1 Full-Truckload (FTL)
    • 5.1.2 Less-than-Truckload (LTL)
    • 5.1.3 Others
  • 5.2 By Equipment / Trailer Type
    • 5.2.1 Dry Van
    • 5.2.2 Refrigerated Van
    • 5.2.3 Flatbed / Step-Deck
    • 5.2.4 Tanker (Bulk Liquid & Chemical)
    • 5.2.5 Others
  • 5.3 By Haul Length
    • 5.3.1 Long-Haul (More than 500 miles)
    • 5.3.2 Regional (100–500 miles)
    • 5.3.3 Local (Less than 100 miles)
  • 5.4 By Business Model
    • 5.4.1 Traditional Freight Brokerage
    • 5.4.2 Asset-Based Freight Brokerage
    • 5.4.3 Agent Model Freight Brokerage
    • 5.4.4 Digital Freight Brokerage
  • 5.5 By End-User Industry
    • 5.5.1 Manufacturing & Automotive
    • 5.5.2 Construction & Infrastructure Projects
    • 5.5.3 Oil, Gas, Mining & Chemicals
    • 5.5.4 Agriculture & Food / Beverage
    • 5.5.5 Retail, FMCG & Wholesale Distribution
    • 5.5.6 Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
    • 5.5.7 E-commerce & 3PL Fulfilment
    • 5.5.8 Other End-User Industry
  • 5.6 By Customer Size
    • 5.6.1 Large Enterprise Shippers (More than $100 M Freight Spend)
    • 5.6.2 Mid-Market Shippers ($10–100 M)
    • 5.6.3 Small Businesses (Less than $10 M)
  • 5.7 By Geography
    • 5.7.1 Northeast
    • 5.7.2 Midwest
    • 5.7.3 Southeast
    • 5.7.4 Southwest
    • 5.7.5 West

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves (M&A, Funding, Partnerships)
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global-level Overview, Market-level Overview, Core Segments, Financials, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.
    • 6.4.2 Total Quality Logistics (TQL)
    • 6.4.3 XPO Logistics Inc.
    • 6.4.4 Echo Global Logistics
    • 6.4.5 Worldwide Express
    • 6.4.6 Coyote Logistics (UPS)
    • 6.4.7 Landstar System Inc.
    • 6.4.8 Schneider FreightPlus
    • 6.4.9 GlobalTranz (WWEX)
    • 6.4.10 J.B. Hunt 360º
    • 6.4.11 Hub Group
    • 6.4.12 Uber Freight
    • 6.4.13 BNSF Logistics
    • 6.4.14 SunteckTTS
    • 6.4.15 Arrive Logistics
    • 6.4.16 Nolan Transportation Group
    • 6.4.17 Mode Global
    • 6.4.18 Convoy Inc.
    • 6.4.19 Red Technologies
    • 6.4.20 ArcBest Corporation
    • 6.4.21 Allen Lund Company
    • 6.4.22 Redwood Logistics
    • 6.4.23 BlueGrace Logistics
    • 6.4.24 Trinity Logistics

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-Space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the United States freight brokerage market as the gross revenue earned by licensed intermediaries that arrange domestic or cross-border surface freight moves for shippers, negotiate rates, and tender loads to for-hire motor carriers while holding neither the freight nor the rolling stock in their own name. According to Mordor Intelligence, the definition covers stand-alone traditional, asset-light, and digital brokerage operations across full-truckload, less-than-truckload, and other specialized truck services.

Scope Exclusions: Pure freight forwarding, asset-based trucking revenue, parcel integrators, customs brokerage only services, and maritime or air forwarders are left outside this market boundary.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Service
    • Full-Truckload (FTL)
    • Less-than-Truckload (LTL)
    • Others
  • By Equipment / Trailer Type
    • Dry Van
    • Refrigerated Van
    • Flatbed / Step-Deck
    • Tanker (Bulk Liquid & Chemical)
    • Others
  • By Haul Length
    • Long-Haul (More than 500 miles)
    • Regional (100–500 miles)
    • Local (Less than 100 miles)
  • By Business Model
    • Traditional Freight Brokerage
    • Asset-Based Freight Brokerage
    • Agent Model Freight Brokerage
    • Digital Freight Brokerage
  • By End-User Industry
    • Manufacturing & Automotive
    • Construction & Infrastructure Projects
    • Oil, Gas, Mining & Chemicals
    • Agriculture & Food / Beverage
    • Retail, FMCG & Wholesale Distribution
    • Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
    • E-commerce & 3PL Fulfilment
    • Other End-User Industry
  • By Customer Size
    • Large Enterprise Shippers (More than $100 M Freight Spend)
    • Mid-Market Shippers ($10–100 M)
    • Small Businesses (Less than $10 M)
  • By Geography
    • Northeast
    • Midwest
    • Southeast
    • Southwest
    • West

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Telephone interviews and online surveys with shipper logistics managers, carrier sales directors, and independent freight agents across all five U.S. regions helped us validate average load volumes, broker margin ranges, digital adoption rates, and service-mix shifts that are scarcely published, thereby tightening our model's assumptions around revenue pools and price realizations.

Desk Research

We first assembled a foundational view using open data from tier-one sources such as the U.S. Department of Transportation Freight Analysis Framework, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration carrier counts, Bureau of Transportation Statistics ton-mile series, the Commodity Flow Survey, and annual State of Logistics reports. Macroeconomic anchors, including the industrial production index, retail sales, and diesel price trends, came from the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Company filings mined through D&B Hoovers and news archives on Dow Jones Factiva supplemented market share and rate movement clues. This illustrative list is not exhaustive; many additional public and subscription sources informed interim checks and clarifications.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down reconstruction began with 2024 domestic trucking spend, filtered by the historical brokerage penetration rate derived from shipper interviews, and then benchmarked against FMCSA broker license counts. Select bottom-up roll-ups, including sampled large-broker gross revenue and average commission multiplied by active agent counts, served as a reasonableness check. Key variables feeding the forecast include truckload spot-to-contract rate differentials, e-commerce retail sales, carrier capacity exits, diesel price expectations, regulation-driven digital load-board uptake, and near-shoring freight corridor growth. A multivariate regression linked these drivers to brokerage penetration, while an ARIMA overlay smoothed cyclical rate swings. Data gaps in agent model revenue were bridged with weighted averages from margin disclosures shared confidentially during interviews.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Model outputs pass three layers of analyst review: variance tests versus ATA tonnage, anomaly scans against quarterly public earnings, and peer corroboration inside Mordor's freight team. We refresh every twelve months and trigger interim revisions when fuel or spot rates deviate by more than ten percent. A final sign-off occurs immediately before publication.

Why Our United States Freight Brokerage Baseline Commands Reliability

Published estimates often differ because each firm selects unique service scopes, revenue measures, or refresh cadences.

Key gap drivers include (1) whether gross or net commission is counted, (2) inclusion of forwarding or parcel activity, (3) differing views on digital broker ramp-up speed, and (4) model refresh timing that may miss rapid spot-rate moves.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 19.68 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 3.53 B (2024) Regional Consultancy A Uses net revenue only; omits LTL brokerage
USD 12.67 B (2024) Industry Association B Excludes digital-only platforms and cross-border loads
USD 164.3 B (2025) Global Consultancy C Broad NAICS scope adds forwarding, customs, and warehousing

The comparison shows how Mordor's disciplined service boundary, annually refreshed variables, and dual-check model present a balanced, transparent baseline that decision-makers can trace back to published series and repeatable steps. We believe this provides clients with the most dependable starting point for strategic planning.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the United States freight brokerage market and how fast is it growing?

The market is valued at USD 19.68 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 28.17 billion by 2030, reflecting a 7.44% CAGR.

Which service type is expanding the fastest within the United States freight brokerage market?

Less-than-Truckload (LTL) brokerage is the growth leader, progressing at a 9.0% CAGR through 2030 as e-commerce pushes smaller, more frequent shipments.

How are digital freight platforms reshaping competitive dynamics?

Digital brokers are growing at 17.0% CAGR and use AI tools to automate load tendering, dynamic pricing, and compliance checks, shortening transaction cycles and compressing costs.

Which region offers the highest growth potential for freight brokers?

The Southwest is projected to expand at 8.2% CAGR, supported by cross-border trade with Mexico, semiconductor investment, and population growth.

Why are refrigerated trailers attracting increased brokerage interest?

Rising demand from food, pharmaceutical, and healthcare customers is propelling refrigerated van revenue at a 10.1% CAGR, the highest rate among trailer categories.

How is the driver shortage influencing broker margins?

Carrier scarcity elevates spot tender rejections and allows brokers with strong carrier networks to negotiate higher service premiums while maintaining high load-coverage velocity.

Page last updated on: