
United States Defense Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The United States defense market size was valued at USD 342.03 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 354.48 billion in 2026 to reach USD 423.87 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 3.64% during the forecast period (2026-2031). The FY2026 funding supports continued investment in the US military modernization and readiness. Investment priorities include munitions and long-range weapons, autonomous systems, space capabilities, integrated sensors, and command-and-control (C2) systems. Strengthening domestic industrial capacity is also a central priority under the 2026 National Defense Strategy, which calls for expanding the US defense production and improving the industry's ability to deliver and sustain critical systems at scale. Production capacity, long-lead components, workforce availability, and supply chain resilience remain important factors affecting delivery timelines. These investments support opportunities for prime contractors and qualified suppliers across autonomy, sensors, software integration, advanced components, and missile and munitions production.
Key Report Takeaways
- By armed forces, the Army held 40.55% of the United States defense market share in 2025, while the Air Force is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 4.98% through 2031.
- By type, military platforms accounted for 39.50% of the United States defense market share in 2025, while unmanned systems are projected to grow at a 7.89% CAGR through 2031.
- By domain, land held 40.45% of the United States defense market size in 2025, while space is forecast to grow at a 6.98% CAGR through 2031.
- By procurement nature, indigenous production accounted for 69.54% of the United States defense market in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a 5.29% CAGR through 2031.
Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.
United States Defense Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis*
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision-munitions replenishment and stockpile expansion | +0.90% | US homeland, Indo-Pacific, and European theaters | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rapid adoption of autonomous and attritable defense systems | +0.70% | National, with early fielding in the Indo-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Allied procurement and co-development expanding production demand | +0.50% | NATO-aligned countries and Indo-Pacific partners | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| AI-enabled C4ISR driving demand for decision-superiority capabilities | +0.50% | Continental US and deployed joint forces | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Defense supply-chain reshoring driving domestic capacity expansion | +0.40% | Texas, Connecticut, California, and Virginia industrial corridors | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Contested logistics accelerating distributed sustainment and autonomous resupply | +0.30% | Indo-Pacific and Central Command theaters | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Precision-Munitions Replenishment and Stockpile Expansion
Demand for missiles and munitions is driving substantial expansion of production capacity across the US defense industrial base. In July 2026, Lockheed Martin received a seven-year PAC-3 MSE contract modification worth up to USD 53.86 billion, bringing the total multiyear contract value to USD 58.62 billion when combined with the April 2026 year-one award.[1]Lockheed Martin, “Department of War Awards Lockheed Martin USD 58.62 Billion for Multiyear PAC-3 MSE Production,” Lockheed Martin, news.lockheedmartin.com. The company also received a USD 35.33 billion multiyear THAAD production contract, alongside plans to expand annual THAAD interceptor capacity from 96 to 400 units. Raytheon entered five framework agreements of up to seven years, covering Tomahawk, AMRAAM, SM-3 Block IB and IIA, and SM-6.[2]RTX, “Raytheon Partners With Department of War on Five Landmark Agreements to Expand Critical Munition Production,” RTX, rtx.com. These longer-term commitments provide greater demand visibility for manufacturers and their supply chains and support investment in additional production capacity.
Rapid Adoption of Autonomous and Attritable Defense Systems
Autonomous and attritable systems are receiving increased US defense investment as the DoD seeks to procure lower-cost unmanned capabilities at a greater scale. The FY2026 budget identifies USD 13.40 billion for autonomy and autonomous systems, including USD 9.40 billion for unmanned and remotely operated aerial vehicles. Separately, the Department of the Navy identified USD 1.30 billion for counter-UAS capabilities. The Drone Dominance Program is also allocating USD 1.00 billion to support the procurement and manufacture of approximately 340,000 small unmanned aircraft systems over two years. Higher procurement volumes can expand demand across airframes, payloads, communications, software, power systems, and other supporting components.
Allied Procurement and Co-Development Expanding Production Demand
Foreign defense demand is supporting the US defense industrial base by increasing production scale and providing additional demand for domestically manufactured systems. An April 2025 executive order directed reforms to improve the speed and accountability of foreign defense sales while supporting domestic production and opportunities to reduce unit costs. Lockheed Martin increased HIMARS annual production capacity from 48 to 96 launchers, supported by approximately USD 2.80 billion in US Army contracts and strong domestic and international demand. The US policy also requires that arms transfers be managed without materially harming force readiness or worsening critical production backlogs, making additional industrial capacity important to support both domestic and allied requirements.
AI-Enabled C4ISR Driving Demand for Decision-Superiority Capabilities
AI-enabled data architectures are becoming increasingly important within the US C2 modernization. The 25th Infantry Division evaluated Next Generation Command and Control during Lightning Surge in January 2026, integrating data from multiple systems to improve tactical access to operational information. Following operational validation involving the 4th and 25th Infantry Divisions, the Army established an NGC2 common data-layer baseline in June 2026. The architecture is designed to bring data, applications, sensors, and AI-enabled capabilities into a more integrated operational environment, increasing demand for secure software integration, data infrastructure, communications, cybersecurity, and mission-system capabilities.
Restraints Impact Analysis*
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense-industrial capacity gaps and persistent production lead times | -0.50% | Connecticut, Virginia, and Texas production hubs | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Competition for funding, skilled labor, test capacity, and production slots | -0.30% | National | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Cybersecurity and classified-integration requirements slowing software deployment | -0.20% | Continental US classified networks | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Test-range, spectrum, and certification bottlenecks delaying autonomous-system validation | -0.20% | Yuma, White Sands, Point Mugu, and Pacific ranges | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Defense-Industrial Capacity Gaps and Persistent Production Lead Times
Industrial capacity limits constrain the United States defense market even when funding supports munitions and naval programs. Solid rocket motors, PAC-3 seeker components, and specialized shipbuilding labor remain important bottlenecks. The FY2026 budget includes USD 2.60 billion in funding for Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment and Defense Production Act Title III. These funds address risks involving critical minerals, microelectronics, castings, and forgings. The DoD acquired a 15% stake in MP Materials during 2025 to support domestic rare-earth magnet capacity.[3]US Department of Defense Comptroller, “FY 2026 Budget Request Overview Book,” Defense.gov, comptroller.defense.gov. However, planned magnet capacity will not reach 10,000 metric tons annually until 2028. Until then, material shortages can slow production of missiles, electric-drive vessels, and unmanned systems.
Cybersecurity and Classified-Integration Requirements Slowing Software Deployment
Cybersecurity and classified-system requirements can delay software adoption across the United States defense market, especially for smaller suppliers. The final Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification rule took effect in November 2025. Level 2 requirements can require assessment by an authorized third-party organization for contractors handling controlled unclassified information. The DoD suspended Phase 2 of the rollout for review in July 2026. DFARS, export-control rules, and related compliance obligations add cost and time for new entrants. Large contractors with established classified networks can absorb these requirements more readily. Mid-tier software firms may face authorization cycles that erode their early deployment advantage.
*Our forecasts treat driver/restraint impacts as directional, not additive. The impact forecasts reflect baseline growth, mix effects, and variable interactions.
Segment Analysis
By Armed Forces: Army Spending Weight Supports the Largest Position
The Army held 40.55% of the United States defense market share in 2025, supported by ground-force modernization, soldier systems, and counter-unmanned aircraft programs. Its spending spans combat vehicles, brigade equipment, communications, and force-protection assets. This breadth gives the Army a large procurement base even as priorities shift toward distributed operations. Ground programs also generate recurring demand for maintenance, training, sensors, and tactical networks. The Army's modernization choices influence suppliers across the defense industrial base. Counter-drone adoption at brigade and lower echelons adds a new volume source for platforms and payloads. The United States defense market, therefore, remains tied to the Army's broad operational requirements. These requirements favor integrators that can connect vehicles, sensors, and command applications.
The Air Force is forecast to grow at a 4.98% CAGR through 2031, the highest among the armed forces. Collaborative Combat Aircraft development, B-21 production, and investments associated with Golden Dome support the service's modernization outlook. The CCA program transitioned to development and production contracting in June 2026, and operational testing continued throughout the year. The Navy remains closely linked to submarine and ship construction, where specialized suppliers, skilled labor, infrastructure constraints, and long-lead components can limit how quickly higher funding translates into delivered platforms.

By Type: Military Platforms Retain Weight While Unmanned Systems Accelerate
Military Platforms accounted for 39.50% of the United States defense market share in 2025, reflecting the high unit cost of submarines, armored vehicles, aircraft, and major combat systems. These programs absorb large procurement accounts and require extended qualification cycles. Their installed base also sustains maintenance, repair, and upgrade activity after delivery. Platform spending anchors demand for engines, structures, electronics, weapons integration, and training. This position gives established prime contractors an enduring role in the United States defense market. It also makes supplier performance and production schedules important to program outcomes. Large platforms are less flexible to scale than smaller systems. Their procurement profile helps explain the market's moderate aggregate growth rate.
Unmanned Systems is projected to grow at a 7.89% CAGR through 2031, the fastest rate among type segments. The FY2026 autonomy investment and the USD 1.00 billion Drone Dominance Program support increasing procurement volumes for unmanned capabilities. Weapons and ammunition also benefit from production expansion across PAC-3 MSE, THAAD, Tomahawk, AMRAAM, SM-6, and other missile and munition programs. C4ISR, tactical communications, cyber systems, soldier systems, maintenance, training, and infrastructure remain linked to broader joint-force modernization. The FY2026 budget includes USD 15.10 billion for cybersecurity to support joint, all-domain maneuvering and protect the US' interests in cyberspace. Growing deployment of smaller unmanned platforms is also increasing demand for compact, ruggedized sensors, secure communications equipment, and integrated mission payloads capable of operating in contested electromagnetic environments.
By Domain: Land Leads Spending While Space Expands Faster
Land commanded 40.45% of the United States defense market size in 2025 because Army modernization remains a central spending priority. The domain covers combat platforms, tactical systems, munitions, ground sensors, and force protection. Legacy vehicle fleets still require upgrades and recurring maintenance. At the same time, distributed autonomy is shifting the balance between large platforms and smaller, more connected systems. This transition supports demand for tactical networks, unmanned aircraft, counter-drone tools, and resilient logistics. Land programs also rely on domestic manufacturing capacity for vehicles, munitions, and electronics. The United States defense market is therefore affected by suppliers' ability to deliver both legacy sustainment and emerging capabilities. The mixed requirement creates space for incumbent and specialist suppliers.
Space is forecast to expand at a 6.98% CAGR through 2031, the fastest-growing domain. Combined FY2026 Space Force resources approach USD 40.00 billion. The FY2026 funding allocates approximately USD 40 billion to the US Space Force, supporting Golden Dome-related space capabilities, space control, resilient architectures, missile warning and tracking, communications, and space-domain awareness across the joint force. The Golden Dome architecture strengthens the integration of space-based sensors with missile-defense C2 systems. Naval investment in autonomous systems is also expanding, with the Department of the Navy allocating USD 5.30 billion for autonomy in FY2026, USD 2.20 billion more than in FY2025. This funding covers unmanned aircraft, surface, and undersea systems, including Medium Unmanned Surface Vessels (MUSVs), increasing demand for shared autonomy, sensing, communications, and command technologies across multiple operating domains.

By Procurement Nature: Domestic Production Dominates the Sourcing Mix
Indigenous production accounted for 69.54% of the United States defense market in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a 5.29% CAGR. The segment benefits from increased policy emphasis on domestic manufacturing, supply chain resilience, and defense-industrial capacity. The 2026 National Defense Strategy identifies strengthening the US defense industrial base as a core line of effort and calls for additional investment in domestic production capacity. The USD 1 billion Drone Dominance Program also operates within a broader policy framework that supports US-manufactured drones, thereby reinforcing opportunities for domestic platform, component, electronics, and subsystem suppliers. Growing emphasis on domestic sourcing is encouraging investment in critical materials, manufacturing capacity, and qualified suppliers, although constraints in specialized domestic capacity can affect production schedules.
Foreign procurement remains relevant where allied technologies, specialized components, or production capacity complement domestic supply. The 2026 National Defense Strategy specifically calls for leveraging allied and partner-nation production to help meet US requirements, while recent supply chain policy supports the qualification of both domestic and partner-nation sources for critical materials and components. Separately, reforms to Foreign Military Sales (FMS) are intended to leverage allied demand to strengthen the US production volumes, improve supply chain stability, and lower unit costs for the US and its partners. Together, these policies indicate that domestic production will remain dominant, while allied sourcing continues to play a targeted role in supporting interoperability, supply chain resilience, and specialized capability requirements.
Geography Analysis
The United States defense market is national in scope, with operational requirements and the location of specialized industrial capacity shaping procurement more than conventional state-level market segments. Connecticut and Virginia remain central to nuclear submarine construction, while Texas supports major missile, fire-control, sensor, and related defense manufacturing. Ohio is developing a significant autonomous-system manufacturing base through new large-scale production investment, while California maintains an established unmanned-aircraft development and manufacturing ecosystem. These clusters concentrate specialized labor, qualified facilities, and supplier networks that are difficult to replicate quickly. Northrop Grumman has also expanded tactical solid-rocket-motor capacity at its Allegany Ballistics Laboratory in West Virginia, including capacity supporting PAC-3 MSE and other missile requirements. The company has doubled its capacity since 2021 and expects to triple it by early 2027.
The Indo-Pacific is one of the central priorities shaping the US defense requirements, particularly for long-range strike, undersea warfare, resilient communications, space capabilities, and distributed operations. The 2026 National Defense Strategy identifies defending the homeland and deterring China in the Indo-Pacific as its first two lines of effort. These requirements support continued investment in precision weapons, autonomous systems, resilient sensors, and C2 networks. European requirements and allied demand also support US missile, air defense, and ammunition production, while homeland defense is generating additional demand for missile defense and counter-UAS capabilities. In July 2026, AeroVironment announced a three-year USD 500 million IDIQ contract supporting the Domestic Shield Program, covering C-UAS capabilities for force protection and base defense.
The geographic profile of the United States defense market reflects the relationship between operational requirements and domestic capacity to manufacture qualified defense systems. Missile production depends on specialized suppliers for propulsion, seekers, electronics, and other components, while naval construction depends on a limited number of specialized shipyards, suppliers, and skilled workers. The GAO has identified infrastructure and workforce constraints as persistent challenges affecting Navy shipbuilding performance. Autonomous-system programs can draw from a broader technology base across software, sensors, electronics, airframes, and communications, although secure testing, integration, and qualification requirements remain important. Theater-driven requirements consequently create production signals across different parts of the US industrial base, resulting in a national procurement market shaped by regional production capacity and mission-specific priorities.
Competitive Landscape
The United States defense market remains concentrated across major platform and weapon system programs, with Lockheed Martin Corporation, RTX, Northrop Grumman Corporation, General Dynamics, and The Boeing Company holding significant positions across aircraft, missiles, combat systems, and other large programs. Huntington Ingalls remains a major naval shipbuilding contractor, while L3Harris Technologies holds significant positions across communications, sensors, electronic systems, and propulsion. Long-running programs favor companies with established production capacity, qualified supplier networks, and experience meeting defense acquisition requirements. Competition is broader in areas such as autonomy, AI, counter-UAS, software, and digital integration, where the DoD is actively seeking greater participation from commercial and nontraditional suppliers.
Strategic moves during 2026 illustrate how major contractors are strengthening their positions through long-term production agreements. In July 2026, Lockheed Martin received a USD 53.86 billion PAC-3 MSE contract modification, bringing the total seven-year multiyear value to USD 58.62 billion. In June 2026, the company received a THAAD multiyear production contract valued at approximately USD 35.33 billion. RTX entered five framework agreements of up to seven years each to increase production of Tomahawk, AMRAAM, SM-3 Block IB, SM-3 Block IIA, and SM-6. Northrop Grumman followed in August 2026 with USD 3 billion in multiyear framework agreements to expand missile interceptor component production. These arrangements provide longer-term demand signals that support investment in facilities, workforce, suppliers, and production capacity.
Opportunities remain for smaller and nontraditional suppliers in software, autonomy, AI-enabled command systems, sensors, and system integration. However, companies seeking work on classified or sensitive programs may need appropriate security clearances, cybersecurity controls, secure development environments, and experience with defense integration requirements. These requirements can give established contractors an advantage in programs where secure integration and qualification are critical. Current acquisition reforms are intended to lower entry barriers and increase competition from newer suppliers. Competitive outcomes, therefore, depend not only on technology performance but also on manufacturing scale, program access, security compliance, and the ability to integrate new capabilities with existing defense systems.
United States Defense Industry Leaders
Lockheed Martin Corporation
The Boeing Company
General Dynamics Corporation
RTX Corporation
Northrop Grumman Corporation
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- August 2026: Northrop Grumman signed a combined USD 3 billion framework deal to become a second-source supplier of PAC-3 MSE rocket motors and to quadruple THAAD component production over 7 years, reducing single-source risk in a critical missile defense supply node.
- July 2026: The Department of War awarded Lockheed Martin a USD 58.62 billion, 7-year contract for PAC-3 MSE interceptors, aiming to lift production capacity to 2,000 units per year by 2030.
- July 2026: JIATF-401 awarded AeroVironment a USD 500 million, 3-year IDIQ contract for counter-unmanned aircraft products under the Domestic Shield program, covering force protection and base defense at critical continental US military installations.
United States Defense Market Report Scope
The United States defense market encompasses government spending, procurement, modernization, research and development, and lifecycle support for capabilities used by the US DoD and the US Armed Forces. It includes military aircraft, naval vessels, land systems, missiles and munitions, C2 systems, cybersecurity, unmanned platforms, and maintenance and support services.
The study analyzes historical, current, and forecast US defense budgets and spending across major military domains and procurement programs. It also examines modernization priorities and investments in emerging technologies, including hypersonic weapons, directed energy systems, autonomous and unmanned platforms, advanced space capabilities, artificial intelligence, advanced materials and composites, and additive manufacturing.
The United States defense market is segmented by armed forces, type, domain, and procurement nature. By armed forces, the market is segmented into Air Force, Army, Navy, and Space Force. By type, the market is segmented into soldier systems, sensors, C4ISR and tactical communications, military platforms, weapons and ammunition, unmanned systems, electronic and cyber warfare systems, military MRO, personal training and simulation, and military infrastructure. By domain, the market is segmented into land, air, naval, and space. By procurement nature, the market is segmented into indigenous production and foreign procurement. For each segment, the market size is provided in terms of value (USD).
| Air Force |
| Army |
| Navy |
| Space Force |
| Soldier Systems |
| Sensors |
| C4ISR and Tactical Communications |
| Military Platforms |
| Weapons and Ammunition |
| Unmanned Systems |
| Electronic and Cyber Warfare Systems |
| Military MRO |
| Personal Training and Simulation |
| Military Infrastructure |
| Land |
| Air |
| Naval |
| Space |
| Indigenous Production |
| Foreign Procurement |
| By Armed Forces | Air Force |
| Army | |
| Navy | |
| Space Force | |
| By Type | Soldier Systems |
| Sensors | |
| C4ISR and Tactical Communications | |
| Military Platforms | |
| Weapons and Ammunition | |
| Unmanned Systems | |
| Electronic and Cyber Warfare Systems | |
| Military MRO | |
| Personal Training and Simulation | |
| Military Infrastructure | |
| By Domain | Land |
| Air | |
| Naval | |
| Space | |
| By Procurement Nature | Indigenous Production |
| Foreign Procurement |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the projected value of the United States defense market in 2031?
The United States defense market is forecast to reach USD 423.87 billion by 2031. It is expected to grow from USD 354.48 billion in 2026 at a 3.64% CAGR, supported by munitions, autonomy, and command-network investment.
Which armed force is growing fastest through 2031?
The Air Force is forecast to grow at a 4.98% CAGR through 2031. Collaborative Combat Aircraft, Golden Dome sensor integration, and B-21 production provide the main support for this outlook.
Which defense type has the highest growth rate?
Unmanned systems has the highest forecast growth rate at a 7.89% CAGR through 2031. The FY2026 autonomy budget and domestic Drone Dominance Program support increased unit procurement.
Why is domestic production important to United States defense procurement?
Indigenous production held 69.54% in 2025. It benefits from policy support for domestic manufacturing, indUnited Statestrial resilience, locally produced unmanned systems, and efforts to build qualified component capacity.
What limits the expansion of defense procurement?
Key limits include availability of solid rocket motors, specialized shipbuilding labor, rare-earth magnet capacity, cybersecurity compliance, and secure integration requirements. These constraints can extend the period between award, production, delivery, and operational fielding.
Which domain is expanding fastest?
Space is forecast to grow at a 6.98% CAGR through 2031. The FY2026 Space Force resources approach United StatesD 40 billion and support missile warning, tracking, communications, and resilient command networks.
Page last updated on:


