Thoracic Drainage Devices Market Size and Share

Thoracic Drainage Devices Market (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Thoracic Drainage Devices Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Thoracic Drainage Devices Market size is expected to grow from USD 0.9 billion in 2025 to USD 0.94 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 1.17 billion by 2031 at 4.47% CAGR over 2026-2031.

Remote-care reimbursement, product digitization, and material substitution collectively shape demand while moderating headline growth. Ambulatory surgical centers are expanding procedure volumes at an 8.05% annual rate, nearly 400 basis points ahead of hospitals, and digital platforms are replacing analog water-seal units in intensive care and ECMO protocols. North America remains the revenue anchor, yet the Asia-Pacific is narrowing the gap, driven by China’s Healthy China 2030 initiative and India’s Ayushman Bharat facility upgrades. However, white-space opportunities exist in home-based ECMO, AI-assisted air-leak detection, and biodegradable catheter coatings, inviting new entrants. 

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, chest drainage systems captured a 37.81% revenue share of the thoracic drainage devices market in 2025, whereas thoracic drainage kits are projected to grow at a 6.38% CAGR through 2031. 
  • By material composition, silicone accounted for 46.13% of the thoracic drainage devices market size in 2025, while polyurethane is expected to expand at a 6.81% annual rate through 2031.
  • By application, cardiac surgery led with a 29.85% market share of thoracic drainage devices in 2025, while oncology and pain management are advancing at a 5.58% CAGR through 2031. 
  • By end user, hospitals retained 54.06% revenue share in 2025; ambulatory surgical centers recorded the fastest CAGR at 8.05% through 2031. 
  • By geography, North America held a 39.64% market share of the thoracic drainage devices market in 2025; the Asia-Pacific region is projected to rise at a 7.32% annual rate through 2031. 

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Kits Gain as Efficiency Trumps Customization

Chest drainage systems accounted for 37.81% of the revenue in 2025. In contrast, thoracic drainage kits, valued for their sterilized convenience, are projected to outpace the market at a 6.38% CAGR, driven by ASC demand. Small-bore pleural catheters (≤14 Fr) predominate in the outpatient management of malignant effusions, whereas large-bore variants remain crucial for the treatment of trauma and empyema. Digital systems, though fewer in unit shipments, command 40–50% price premiums and lock in disposable revenue. 

Thoracic Drainage Devices Market: Market Share by Product Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Thoracic Drainage Devices Market: Market Share by Product Type

By Material Composition: Polyurethane Closes the Gap on Silicone

Silicone represented 46.13% of material revenue, favored for biocompatibility. Polyurethane is closing the gap with a 6.81% annual growth rate, aided by thin-wall extrusion technologies. PVC’s share of the thoracic drainage devices market size is expected to drop below 10% by 2031 as regulatory curbs escalate. Advanced polymers such as antimicrobial-coated polyurethane reduce infections by 38%, supporting a 30% price premium.

By Application: Oncology Rises as Cardiac Surgery Plateaus

Cardiac surgery held 29.85% of the thoracic drainage devices market share in 2025, but this is expected to slow as transcatheter interventions reduce chest-tube dwell time. Oncology and pain management advance at a rate of 5.58% annually, reflecting the prevalence of malignant pleural effusion in approximately 150,000 U.S. patients each year. Trauma and infectious disease segments remain steady in emerging economies.

Thoracic Drainage Devices Market: Market Share by Application
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Thoracic Drainage Devices Market: Market Share by Application

By End User: Ambulatory Centers Disrupt Hospital Dominance

Hospitals retained 54.06% revenue in 2025. However, ASC volumes climb at 8.05% as Medicare adds 18 thoracic procedures to its approved list. Home healthcare, though smallest, is expanding rapidly as portable devices enable remote management and 31% global placement growth of PleurX catheters in 2025.

Geography Analysis

North America’s thoracic drainage devices market share was 39.64% in 2025, as digital platforms gained penetration in academic centers above 22%. Medicare’s Hospital-at-Home expansion accelerated demand for portable catheters, while Canada piloted digital devices to cut ICU stays. Germany’s DRG system favors analog systems, whereas the UK negotiated national contracts that bundle device cost with reduced nursing time. France and Italy expanded surgical capacity via public-private partnerships, although expenditure caps limit digital conversion. 

The Asia-Pacific market is expected to grow at a 7.32% annual rate through 2031. China is establishing 120 thoracic centers under the Healthy China 2030 initiative, which is funded by the government. India’s procedure volumes increased by 19% after the inclusion of Ayushman Bharat reimbursement. Japan and South Korea’s expansion of robotic-surgery coverage further boosts demand for small-bore catheters. 

Thoracic Drainage Devices Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Regulatory Landscape

Thoracic drainage devices are largely regulated as moderate-risk products, and the United States commonly classifies chest drainage-related devices under FDA Class II (special controls), with market access typically through the 510(k) pathway. Post-market oversight has remained prominent, with multiple FDA Class II recalls across 2024-2025 tied to issues such as catheter-tip separation and canister failures. These recalls continue to reinforce supplier emphasis on design controls, traceability, and complaint handling.

In Europe, the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) continues to raise clinical evidence and recertification burdens, with re-certification costs averaging around EUR 500,000 per product line and launch timing impacts extending into early 2026. A system-level adjustment was signaled on December 16, 2025, when the European Commission published proposed amendments (COM(2025)1023) to MDR and IVDR to address implementation bottlenecks. Across markets, manufacturers also align product and quality documentation to recognized standards such as ISO 20697:2018 for sterile single-use drainage catheters and ISO 10079-1:2015 for electrically powered drainage equipment, supporting tender eligibility and hospital procurement qualification.

Competitive Landscape

The top five vendors, Medtronic, Teleflex, Becton Dickinson, Getinge, and Cardinal Health, control a significant market share of the thoracic drainage devices market through group-purchasing agreements. Their strategies converge on AI-enabled digital platforms, Asia-Pacific sales expansion, and vertical integration of disposable components. Patent issuance reached 47 in 2024-2025, underscoring the intensity of innovation. New entrants such as Centese and Sinapi Biomedical leverage ISO 13485 contract manufacturing in Southeast Asia to undercut prices by up to 30% while meeting FDA 510(k) and CE standards. 

Home-based ECMO support remains a frontier opportunity; an estimated 10,000 U.S. candidates annually lack access to ICU beds, creating a demand for portable oxygenation and drainage systems. Regulatory stringency under the MDR and China’s surveillance program is forcing consolidation, giving well-capitalized incumbents a compliance advantage. 

Thoracic Drainage Devices Industry Leaders

  1. Becton Dickinson and Company

  2. Getinge AB

  3. Smith Medical

  4. Cook Medical

  5. Teleflex Corporation

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Thoracic Drainage Devices Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

White space is widening around digitized chest drainage workflows that convert analog observations into auditable, objective data for clinical decision-making and procurement justification. FDA 510(k) clearance in March 2025 for ATMOS Inc.'s ATMOS C 051 Cardiothoracic Digital Drain and Observation System adds another commercial digital platform for ICU, thoracic surgery, and ECMO protocols, and it reinforces a shift toward device telemetry that standardizes chest tube removal decisions. Clinical literature comparing suction strategies and intrathoracic pressure settings on digital systems also supports pathway redesign in uncomplicated cases, which increases demand for devices that can capture pressure and air-leak trends consistently.

Opportunities also sit in hybrid and portable configurations that bridge inpatient and ambulatory settings, especially as ambulatory surgical centers expand procedure volumes faster than hospitals and same-day discharge incentives support small-bore catheter use. Purchasing criteria and product development increasingly hinge on (1) interoperability with hospital documentation needs, including objective data export for outcome tracking under tighter audit requirements, (2) compact, alarm-enabled devices for step-down and outpatient monitoring, and (3) material substitution away from PVC toward silicone, polyurethane, and advanced polymers that align with sustainability mandates and infection-control priorities. Vendors that pair digital consoles with recurring disposable ecosystems and offer flexible acquisition models, including episode-based programs seen in parts of Europe, can enter cost-constrained facilities without relying only on capital budgets.

Recent Industry Developments

  • March 2026: Pleural Dynamics announced completion of patient enrollment for the ACES Study for Aseptic Pleural Effusions, a post-market clinical study evaluating its ACES Automatic Continuous Effusion Shunt System. The milestone strengthens clinical evidence generation for non-traditional drainage approaches and supports hospital adoption discussions that increasingly hinge on real-world performance data.
  • February 2026: Medela was awarded a Vizient contract to provide the Thopaz+ digital chest drainage system across Vizient's national network of over 1,400 hospitals. The agreement expands access through a major group-purchasing channel and increases competitive pressure on analog systems by normalizing digital drainage in standardized purchasing pathways.
  • June 2025: A UK framework agreement covering suction consumables, wound drainage, and chest or thoracic drainage accessories was published following conclusion in late April 2025. Multi-year public procurement structures like this shape supplier shortlists and pricing discipline for drainage disposables, influencing both incumbent retention and challenger entry through tender compliance.

Table of Contents for Thoracic Drainage Devices Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising Prevalence of Pleural Diseases
    • 4.2.2 Increasing Thoracic & Cardiac Surgery Volumes
    • 4.2.3 Technological Advances in Digital Drainage Systems
    • 4.2.4 Growing Adoption of Minimally-Invasive & Robotic Procedures
    • 4.2.5 Home-Hospital Reimbursement Models Boosting Portable Devices
    • 4.2.6 ECMO & Lung-Transplant Program Expansion
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High Cost of Advanced Digital Systems
    • 4.3.2 Stringent Regulatory Approvals & Recalls
    • 4.3.3 Sustainability Mandates Targeting Single-Use Plastics
    • 4.3.4 Shortage of Thoracic Nursing Specialists
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.6.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Chest Drainage Systems
    • 5.1.1.1 Water-Seal Systems
    • 5.1.1.2 Dry-Seal Systems
    • 5.1.1.3 Digital / Automated Systems
    • 5.1.2 Pleural Drainage Catheters
    • 5.1.2.1 Small-Bore
    • 5.1.2.2 Large-Bore
    • 5.1.3 Thoracic Drainage Kits
    • 5.1.4 Trocar Drains
    • 5.1.5 Secured Needles
    • 5.1.6 Unsecured Needles
    • 5.1.7 Accessories
  • 5.2 By Material Composition
    • 5.2.1 Silicone
    • 5.2.2 Polyurethane
    • 5.2.3 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
    • 5.2.4 Latex
    • 5.2.5 Other Advanced Polymers
  • 5.3 By Application
    • 5.3.1 Thoracic Surgery & Pulmonology
    • 5.3.2 Cardiac Surgery
    • 5.3.3 Trauma & Emergency Medicine
    • 5.3.4 Oncology & Pain Management
    • 5.3.5 Infectious Diseases
    • 5.3.6 Intensive Care & ECMO
    • 5.3.7 Others
  • 5.4 By End User
    • 5.4.1 Hospitals
    • 5.4.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 5.4.3 Specialty Thoracic & Cardiac Centers
    • 5.4.4 Home Healthcare Settings
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market-level Overview, Core Segments, Financials, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products & Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Argon Medical Devices
    • 6.3.2 Armstrong Medical
    • 6.3.3 ATMOS MedizinTechnik
    • 6.3.4 B. Braun Melsungen AG
    • 6.3.5 Becton, Dickinson & Co.
    • 6.3.6 Boston Scientific
    • 6.3.7 Cardinal Health
    • 6.3.8 Centese, Inc.
    • 6.3.9 Cook Medical
    • 6.3.10 Getinge AB
    • 6.3.11 Medela AG
    • 6.3.12 Medtronic
    • 6.3.13 Merit Medical Systems
    • 6.3.14 Redax S.p.A.
    • 6.3.15 Rocket Medical plc
    • 6.3.16 Sinapi Biomedical
    • 6.3.17 Smiths Medical
    • 6.3.18 Teleflex Incorporated
    • 6.3.19 Utah Medical Products
    • 6.3.20 Vygon SA

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definition and Coverage

This market covers devices used to remove air, blood, or fluid from the pleural or mediastinal space, usually after thoracic surgery or chest trauma. It includes chest drainage systems and related sterile consumables that are typically purchased with the device.

Scope exclusions: We exclude simple wound drains, non-thoracic drainage systems (such as abdominal or neurosurgical drainage), and rental-only service contracts where no device sale is recorded.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product Type
    • Chest Drainage Systems
      • Water-Seal Systems
      • Dry-Seal Systems
      • Digital / Automated Systems
    • Pleural Drainage Catheters
      • Small-Bore
      • Large-Bore
    • Thoracic Drainage Kits
    • Trocar Drains
    • Secured Needles
    • Unsecured Needles
    • Accessories
  • By Material Composition
    • Silicone
    • Polyurethane
    • Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
    • Latex
    • Other Advanced Polymers
  • By Application
    • Thoracic Surgery & Pulmonology
    • Cardiac Surgery
    • Trauma & Emergency Medicine
    • Oncology & Pain Management
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Intensive Care & ECMO
    • Others
  • By End User
    • Hospitals
    • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • Specialty Thoracic & Cardiac Centers
    • Home Healthcare Settings
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • Australia
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East & Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Data Sources, Market Sizing, and Validation

Desk Research

Desk work starts by building the clinical and procedure backdrop that creates demand for thoracic drainage, then translating that into a realistic device and consumables revenue pool. Public sources are used for the stable building blocks, such as procedure volumes, admissions, and respiratory disease burden, using sources such as the US CDC, WHO, OECD health statistics, and national health ministry datasets where available.

We also reference regulatory and product signals, including FDA databases, EUDAMED or similar public registers, and published clinical guidelines in peer-reviewed journals, to understand how device types are used and replaced. Pricing direction and commercialization patterns are checked using company filings, investor presentations, association websites, and reputable press, and then supported where needed by paid subscriptions used for company financials and intelligence, news and financials, and patent databases. This list is not exhaustive, and many other sources are reviewed to fill gaps and double-check assumptions during the study.

Primary Interviews and Surveys

Primary work is used to pressure-test model inputs that desk research cannot reliably standardize, especially how hospitals buy chest drainage systems and how much of the spend sits in proprietary disposables versus the capital unit. We spoke with a mix of manufacturers, distributors, hospital procurement stakeholders, and clinicians across key regions, which helped confirm replacement cycles, average selling price (ASP) bands, and the typical attach rate of kits and catheters by procedure setting.

Distribution of primary research fieldwork respondents

Company typeRespondent positionRegion
Top tier: 26% CXOs: 16%APAC: 45%
Mid tier: 57% Functional/Unit leaders: 31%EMEA: 31%
Smaller Players: 17% Managers: 53%Americas: 24%

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

Sizing is anchored on a top-down build that reconstructs demand from thoracic procedure volumes and related hospitalization signals, then converts that into expected device usage and consumables pull-through. The model uses inputs such as chest tube placements after cardiothoracic and pulmonary surgeries, trauma-related pneumothorax and pleural effusion incidence trends, ICU and surgical capacity indicators, the share of cases using digital versus analog systems, and the average set configuration (system plus catheter or kit) by care setting.

Those totals are corroborated with selective bottom-up approximations, where supplier revenue indicators, sampled ASP-by-region, and channel checks are used to confirm that implied volumes and pricing stay within plausible bounds. When company-level splits are not fully disclosed, gaps are handled using transparent assumptions on regional mix and product mix, then re-tested in interviews until the range tightens.

For forecasting, we mainly apply scenario-based forecasting supported by simple multivariate relationships between procedure growth, adoption of digital drainage, and observed pricing movement for key consumables. Assumptions on ASP progression are kept practical, and they are refreshed when procurement feedback indicates new tender pricing, reimbursement shifts, or meaningful technology substitution.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs are validated through multiple checks so the final number is not driven by one dataset or one interview stream. We compare implied volumes against independent healthcare activity indicators, review outliers at the country and regional level, and re-check any large variances by returning to respondents or revisiting the underlying input series.

Before sign-off, the model and key assumptions go through a multi-step analyst review, including consistency checks on growth rates, currency conversions, and the split between capital units and recurring disposables. Reports are refreshed annually, and interim updates are triggered when material events occur, such as major regulatory actions, sharp currency moves, or step-changes in procedure levels. Right before delivery, a final pass is completed so clients receive the most current view available at that time.

Mordor Intelligence's Thoracic Drainage Devices Market Size Compared With Other Published Estimates

Published market sizes for thoracic drainage devices can vary widely, even when the topic label looks identical, because researchers may not use the same year cut, currency conversion timing, or price logic for disposables versus capital units. Differences also show up when the included product scope is not stated clearly, especially around whether proprietary kits and catheters are counted alongside the drainage system.

In this study, the refresh cadence and currency timing were kept tight by reconciling the model to the latest procedure and procurement signals, then re-checking ASP movement for consumables before finalizing the 2026 value. This is why the Mordor Intelligence figure can sit away from estimates that lean on older price points or different update cycles.

Benchmark comparison

SourceMarket SizeGaps in Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence USD 0.94 B (2026)
Industry Publisher A USD 0.96 B (2025)Uses a different base year and can blend in related services under factory-gate reporting, which shifts the spend boundary versus a device plus proprietary disposables view.
Research Network B USD 1.97 B (2025)Appears to apply a broader product and revenue scope and a higher ASP stack, which can inflate totals if adjacent drainage categories or non-comparable pricing assumptions are included.

The spread in the table is mainly explained by timing and scope. One external estimate is anchored to 2025 with a different factory-gate framing, while the larger number likely includes a wider basket or richer pricing assumptions. By keeping the model tied to procedure-driven demand signals and a clearly stated inclusion of chest drainage systems plus their proprietary consumables, the final output stays traceable to inputs that can be checked and repeated.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How large will the thoracic drainage devices market be by 2031?

It is projected to reach USD 1.17 billion, reflecting a 4.47% CAGR from 2026 to 2031.

Which product segment grows fastest?

Thoracic drainage kits are forecast at a 6.38% CAGR because ASCs prefer turnkey sterile bundles.

Why is polyurethane gaining material share?

Thin-wall extrusion enables smaller-bore catheters and helps comply with PVC phase-out mandates in the EU.

What drives Asia-Pacific growth?

China’s infrastructure spending and India’s Ayushman Bharat reimbursement add surgical capacity, lifting procedure volumes.

Do digital drainage systems justify their premium?

Academic studies show 1–2 day shorter hospital stays and 30% lower nursing workload, offsetting higher device cost in high-acuity centers.

Page last updated on:

Thoracic Drainage Devices Market Report Snapshots