Molluscicide Market Size
Icons | Lable | Value |
---|---|---|
Study Period | 2017 - 2029 | |
Market Size (2024) | USD 1.09 Billion | |
Market Size (2029) | USD 1.38 Billion | |
Largest Share by Application Mode | Foliar | |
CAGR (2024 - 2029) | 4.94 % | |
Largest Share by Region | South America | |
Major Players |
||
|
||
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in alphabetical order. |
Molluscicide Market Analysis
The Molluscicide Market size is estimated at 1.09 billion USD in 2024, and is expected to reach 1.38 billion USD by 2029, growing at a CAGR of 4.94% during the forecast period (2024-2029).
1.09 Billion
Market Size in 2024 (USD)
1.38 Billion
Market Size in 2029 (USD)
3.56 %
CAGR (2017-2023)
4.94 %
CAGR (2024-2029)
Largest Segment by Application Mode
54.17 %
value share, Foliar, 2023
The rising snail infestation, particularly in winter and rainy seasons, and the need to improve yield and prevent losses caused by snails are driving the foliar application.
Largest Segment by Crop Type
44.57 %
value share, Grains & Cereals, 2023
Cereal crops can experience yield losses of 50%-90% when infested by snails. Synthetic molluscicides have proven to be more effective in controlling these mollusk populations.
Largest Segment By Region
36.21 %
value share, South America, 2023
Some of the major snails affecting South American crops include the Giant African Snail (Achatina Fulica) and the Golden Apple Snail (Pomacea Canaliculata).
Fastest-growing Segment by Country
8.52 %
Projected CAGR, Brazil, 2024-2029
Brazil dominated the market owing to factors like the increasing snail infestations and yield losses of several economically important crops.
Leading Market Player
18.32 %
market share, UPL Limited, 2022
UPL Limited offers molluscicide products that are stomach-poisonous and suitable for different crop types, including cereals, oilseeds, pulses, vegetables, and fruits.
The demand for molluscicide is driven by increasing snail infestation and rising crop losses
- Globally, the use of molluscicide is expanding in various application modes. Foliar holds the major share value, accounting for 53.7% of the total molluscicide market in 2022. Demand for molluscicides in this segment is driven by increased snail infestation, particularly during the winter and rainy periods, and a need to improve yields and reduce losses due to snails and slugs.
- The demand for molluscicide chemicals in soil treatment methods is expected to register a CAGR of 4.8% during the forecast period (2023-2029) due to the effectiveness of the soil treatment method for molluscicides. The main molluscicide products used for the treatment of soil are metaldehyde, iron phosphate, methiocarb, sodium ferric ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and niclosamide.
- The chemigation segment in the molluscicide market is expected to grow at 4.6% CAGR from 2023 to 2029. The growth of this segment can be attributed to an increased area under drip irrigation systems, as well as a growing trend of the use of chemicals against snails or slugs using water management on these crops.
- The fumigation method's market value is expected to increase by USD 7.1 million during the forecast period (2023-2029). The market growth is expected to be stimulated by a growing awareness of the economic losses from mollusk damage in farmers and agricultural professionals, as well as the rising adoption of fumigation.
- Therefore, factors such as rising snail infestation, the growing area under irrigation, and increasing crop losses are driving the demand for molluscicide. The global molluscicide market is expected to grow at 4.9% CAGR during the forecast period from 2023 to 2029.
South America dominated the global molluscicide market
- Crop damage caused by slugs and snails can lead to a significant loss in crop yield as well as a negative economic impact on farmers. Consequently, the demand for effective molluscicides that are capable of targeting snails and protecting crops from damage is increasing.
- South America dominated the global molluscicide market, accounting for a market share of 36.2% in 2022. Some of the major snails that affect agriculture in South American countries include the giant African snail (Achatina fulica) and the golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata). These invasive species are known for their voracious appetite and ability to rapidly reproduce, posing a serious threat to various crops. The yield losses caused by these snails can be substantial, with crops like rice, corn, and vegetables being particularly vulnerable. The snails feed on young seedlings, foliage, and even mature plants, leading to reduced crop quality and quantity.
- Asia-Pacific accounted for the second-largest market share of 26.0% in 2022. Snail farming failed in Asia because snails were destroying the growing rice crops, which caused them severe economic consequences as rice farms were considered their most significant source of food and farm income. The golden apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata, had been introduced to several Asian countries, where it unexpectedly developed into a pest for rice crops. Most farmers have resorted to chemical control, which includes the use of molluscicides, and have also resorted to integrated snail management practices.
- The increasing snail and slug infestations in major crops will drive the molluscicides market globally, which is anticipated to register a CAGR of 4.9% during the forecast period (2023-2029).
Global Molluscicide Market Trends
Increasing threat to crop production due to molluscicides is increasing the usage
- The global average consumption of molluscicides per hectare increased from 418.0 grams per hectare in 2017 to 425.5 grams per hectare in 2022. Asia-Pacific recorded the highest per-hectare consumption of molluscicides, with 152.69 grams per hectare in 2022. Golden apple snails are the major threat to rice production in Asia-Pacific countries as they cut the rice stem at the base, destroying the whole plant and leading to annual yield losses of up to 50%, especially in irrigated rice fields, according to the International Rice Research Institute.
- Europe is the second-largest per-hectare consumer, with 124.32 grams per hectare of molluscicides in 2022. South America is the third-largest per-hectare consumer of molluscicides, with 110.41 grams per hectare of land in 2022. The giant African snail (Achatina fulica) and the golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) are invasive species known for their voracious appetite and ability to reproduce rapidly, posing a serious threat to various crops. The yield losses caused by these snails can be substantial, with crops like rice, corn, and vegetables being particularly vulnerable.
- North America consumed 37.2 grams of molluscicides per hectare of land, which is significantly less compared to other regions. However, Deroceras reticulatum is one of the most invasive slug species of maize and soybean in the United States. At later growth stages, corn and soybean defoliation by slugs can lead to delayed canopy development and subsequent lower yields. Such attacks call for the need for effective management, which includes the use of molluscicides.
Effectiveness of the metaldehyde in controlling snails and slugs in various crops like field crops and horticultural crops may increase the price of it
- Molluscicides are essential in agriculture and horticulture for effectively controlling mollusks like snails and slugs, which can cause significant damage to crop and ornamental plants. These pesticides play a vital role in protecting plant health, preventing yield losses, and maintaining the aesthetic appeal of gardens and landscapes.
- Metaldehyde is a molluscicide belonging to the chemical class of aldehydes. It is widely used to control snails and slugs, which are common pests in agricultural and horticultural crops. It was priced at USD 52.5 thousand per metric ton in 2022. Metaldehyde effectively controls a variety of snail and slug species, including common garden snails, grey field slugs, and black field slugs.
- These mollusks can cause significant damage to a wide range of crops, including vegetables, fruits, ornamental plants, and field crops. The mode of action of metaldehyde as a molluscicide involves inducing hyperactivity and loss of coordination in snails and slugs. When ingested, metaldehyde disrupts their nervous systems, leading to increased movement and a loss of their ability to feed properly. This eventually results in the pests becoming dehydrated and succumbing to the effects of metaldehyde.
- Ferric phosphate is a molluscicide used to control snails and slugs in agricultural and horticultural settings. It is also known as iron phosphate and is a naturally occurring compound. It was priced at USD 52.0 thousand per metric ton in 2022.
- Ferric phosphate effectively controls a variety of snail and slug species, including common garden snails, grey field slugs, and black field slugs. These mollusks are common pests that can cause damage to crops, vegetables, fruits, ornamental plants, and various other cultivated plants.
Molluscicide Industry Overview
The Molluscicide Market is fragmented, with the top five companies occupying 22.13%. The major players in this market are American Vanguard Corporation, Arxada, Nufarm Ltd, PI Industries and UPL Limited (sorted alphabetically).
Molluscicide Market Leaders
American Vanguard Corporation
Arxada
Nufarm Ltd
PI Industries
UPL Limited
Other important companies include Liphatech Inc., Mitsui & Co. Ltd (Certis Belchim), W. Neudorff GmbH KG.
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in alphabetical order.
Molluscicide Market News
- November 2022: Certis Belchim BV acquired the assets of Henry Manufacturing Limited in New Zealand. This includes its portfolio and pipeline of potassium fatty-acid salts, which have various applications in crop protection.
- March 2022: A new company called Certis Belchim BV was formed by Mitsui & Co. Ltd by merging its recently acquired Belchim Crop Protection and its European subsidiary Certis Europe. This was done in accordance with the terms of a definitive agreement.
- June 2021: Belchim Crop Protection was fully acquired by Mitsui & Co. Ltd after purchasing the remaining 32% of shares owned by Belchim Management NV/SA. Mitsui now holds a 62% stake in Belchim Crop Protection alongside ISK and Mitsui Chemicals Agro. This acquisition allows Mitsui to focus on establishing a sustainable crop protection company in Europe.
Free with this Report
Along with the report, We also offer a comprehensive and exhaustive data pack with 50+ graphs on insecticide, fungicides, and herbicides consumption per hectare and the average price of active ingredients used in insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, nematicides, and molluscicides. The data pack includes Globe, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Africa.
Molluscicide Market Report - Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & KEY FINDINGS
REPORT OFFERS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Study Assumptions & Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Study
1.3. Research Methodology
2. KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS
2.1. Consumption Of Pesticide Per Hectare
2.2. Pricing Analysis For Active Ingredients
2.3. Regulatory Framework
2.3.1. Australia
2.3.2. China
2.3.3. France
2.3.4. Germany
2.3.5. India
2.3.6. Indonesia
2.3.7. Italy
2.3.8. Japan
2.3.9. Myanmar
2.3.10. Netherlands
2.3.11. Pakistan
2.3.12. Philippines
2.3.13. Russia
2.3.14. Spain
2.3.15. Thailand
2.3.16. Ukraine
2.3.17. United Kingdom
2.3.18. Vietnam
2.4. Value Chain & Distribution Channel Analysis
3. MARKET SEGMENTATION (includes market size in Value in USD and Volume, Forecasts up to 2029 and analysis of growth prospects)
3.1. Application Mode
3.1.1. Chemigation
3.1.2. Foliar
3.1.3. Fumigation
3.1.4. Soil Treatment
3.2. Crop Type
3.2.1. Commercial Crops
3.2.2. Fruits & Vegetables
3.2.3. Grains & Cereals
3.2.4. Pulses & Oilseeds
3.2.5. Turf & Ornamental
3.3. Region
3.3.1. Africa
3.3.1.1. By Country
3.3.1.1.1. South Africa
3.3.1.1.2. Rest of Africa
3.3.2. Asia-Pacific
3.3.2.1. By Country
3.3.2.1.1. Australia
3.3.2.1.2. China
3.3.2.1.3. India
3.3.2.1.4. Indonesia
3.3.2.1.5. Japan
3.3.2.1.6. Myanmar
3.3.2.1.7. Pakistan
3.3.2.1.8. Philippines
3.3.2.1.9. Thailand
3.3.2.1.10. Vietnam
3.3.2.1.11. Rest of Asia-Pacific
3.3.3. Europe
3.3.3.1. By Country
3.3.3.1.1. France
3.3.3.1.2. Germany
3.3.3.1.3. Italy
3.3.3.1.4. Netherlands
3.3.3.1.5. Russia
3.3.3.1.6. Spain
3.3.3.1.7. Ukraine
3.3.3.1.8. United Kingdom
3.3.3.1.9. Rest of Europe
3.3.4. North America
3.3.4.1. By Country
3.3.4.1.1. Canada
3.3.4.1.2. Mexico
3.3.4.1.3. United States
3.3.4.1.4. Rest of North America
3.3.5. South America
3.3.5.1. By Country
3.3.5.1.1. Argentina
3.3.5.1.2. Brazil
3.3.5.1.3. Chile
3.3.5.1.4. Rest of South America
4. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
4.1. Key Strategic Moves
4.2. Market Share Analysis
4.3. Company Landscape
4.4. Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Business Segments, Financials, Headcount, Key Information, Market Rank, Market Share, Products and Services, and analysis of Recent Developments)
4.4.1. American Vanguard Corporation
4.4.2. Arxada
4.4.3. Liphatech Inc.
4.4.4. Mitsui & Co. Ltd (Certis Belchim)
4.4.5. Nufarm Ltd
4.4.6. PI Industries
4.4.7. UPL Limited
4.4.8. W. Neudorff GmbH KG
5. KEY STRATEGIC QUESTIONS FOR CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS CEOS
6. APPENDIX
6.1. Global Overview
6.1.1. Overview
6.1.2. Porter’s Five Forces Framework
6.1.3. Global Value Chain Analysis
6.1.4. Market Dynamics (DROs)
6.2. Sources & References
6.3. List of Tables & Figures
6.4. Primary Insights
6.5. Data Pack
6.6. Glossary of Terms
List of Tables & Figures
- Figure 1:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMPTION PER HECTARE, GRAMS, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 2:
- ACTIVE INGREDIENT PRICE PER METRIC TON, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 3:
- MOLLUSCICIDE VOLUME METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 4:
- MOLLUSCICIDE VALUE USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 5:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY APPLICATION MODE, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 6:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY APPLICATION MODE, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 7:
- VALUE SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY APPLICATION MODE, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 8:
- VOLUME SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY APPLICATION MODE, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 9:
- CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS APPLIED THROUGH CHEMIGATION, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 10:
- CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS APPLIED THROUGH CHEMIGATION, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 11:
- VALUE SHARE OF CHEMIGATION BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 12:
- CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS APPLIED THROUGH FOLIAR, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 13:
- CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS APPLIED THROUGH FOLIAR, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 14:
- VALUE SHARE OF FOLIAR BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 15:
- CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS APPLIED THROUGH FUMIGATION, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 16:
- CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS APPLIED THROUGH FUMIGATION, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 17:
- VALUE SHARE OF FUMIGATION BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 18:
- CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS APPLIED THROUGH SOIL TREATMENT, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 19:
- CROP PROTECTION CHEMICALS APPLIED THROUGH SOIL TREATMENT, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 20:
- VALUE SHARE OF SOIL TREATMENT BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 21:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY CROP TYPE, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 22:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY CROP TYPE, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 23:
- VALUE SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 24:
- VOLUME SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 25:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY COMMERCIAL CROPS, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 26:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY COMMERCIAL CROPS, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 27:
- VALUE SHARE OF COMMERCIAL CROPS BY APPLICATION MODE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 28:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY FRUITS & VEGETABLES, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 29:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY FRUITS & VEGETABLES, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 30:
- VALUE SHARE OF FRUITS & VEGETABLES BY APPLICATION MODE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 31:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY GRAINS & CEREALS, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 32:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY GRAINS & CEREALS, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 33:
- VALUE SHARE OF GRAINS & CEREALS BY APPLICATION MODE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 34:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY PULSES & OILSEEDS, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 35:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY PULSES & OILSEEDS, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 36:
- VALUE SHARE OF PULSES & OILSEEDS BY APPLICATION MODE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 37:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY TURF & ORNAMENTAL, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 38:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY TURF & ORNAMENTAL, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 39:
- VALUE SHARE OF TURF & ORNAMENTAL BY APPLICATION MODE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 40:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY REGION, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 41:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY REGION, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 42:
- VALUE SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY REGION, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 43:
- VOLUME SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY REGION, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 44:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 45:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 46:
- VALUE SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 47:
- VOLUME SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 48:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY SOUTH AFRICA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 49:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY SOUTH AFRICA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 50:
- VALUE SHARE OF SOUTH AFRICA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 51:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF AFRICA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 52:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF AFRICA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 53:
- VALUE SHARE OF REST OF AFRICA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 54:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 55:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 56:
- VALUE SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 57:
- VOLUME SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 58:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY AUSTRALIA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 59:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY AUSTRALIA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 60:
- VALUE SHARE OF AUSTRALIA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 61:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY CHINA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 62:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY CHINA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 63:
- VALUE SHARE OF CHINA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 64:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY INDIA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 65:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY INDIA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 66:
- VALUE SHARE OF INDIA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 67:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY INDONESIA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 68:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY INDONESIA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 69:
- VALUE SHARE OF INDONESIA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 70:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY JAPAN, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 71:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY JAPAN, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 72:
- VALUE SHARE OF JAPAN BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 73:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY MYANMAR, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 74:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY MYANMAR, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 75:
- VALUE SHARE OF MYANMAR BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 76:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY PAKISTAN, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 77:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY PAKISTAN, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 78:
- VALUE SHARE OF PAKISTAN BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 79:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY PHILIPPINES, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 80:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY PHILIPPINES, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 81:
- VALUE SHARE OF PHILIPPINES BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 82:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY THAILAND, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 83:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY THAILAND, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 84:
- VALUE SHARE OF THAILAND BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 85:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY VIETNAM, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 86:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY VIETNAM, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 87:
- VALUE SHARE OF VIETNAM BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 88:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 89:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 90:
- VALUE SHARE OF REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 91:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 92:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 93:
- VALUE SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 94:
- VOLUME SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 95:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY FRANCE, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 96:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY FRANCE, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 97:
- VALUE SHARE OF FRANCE BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 98:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY GERMANY, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 99:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY GERMANY, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 100:
- VALUE SHARE OF GERMANY BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 101:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY ITALY, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 102:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY ITALY, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 103:
- VALUE SHARE OF ITALY BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 104:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY NETHERLANDS, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 105:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY NETHERLANDS, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 106:
- VALUE SHARE OF NETHERLANDS BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 107:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY RUSSIA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 108:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY RUSSIA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 109:
- VALUE SHARE OF RUSSIA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 110:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY SPAIN, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 111:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY SPAIN, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 112:
- VALUE SHARE OF SPAIN BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 113:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY UKRAINE, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 114:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY UKRAINE, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 115:
- VALUE SHARE OF UKRAINE BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 116:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY UNITED KINGDOM, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 117:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY UNITED KINGDOM, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 118:
- VALUE SHARE OF UNITED KINGDOM BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 119:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF EUROPE, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 120:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF EUROPE, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 121:
- VALUE SHARE OF REST OF EUROPE BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 122:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 123:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 124:
- VALUE SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 125:
- VOLUME SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 126:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY CANADA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 127:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY CANADA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 128:
- VALUE SHARE OF CANADA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 129:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY MEXICO, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 130:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY MEXICO, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 131:
- VALUE SHARE OF MEXICO BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 132:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY UNITED STATES, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 133:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY UNITED STATES, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 134:
- VALUE SHARE OF UNITED STATES BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 135:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF NORTH AMERICA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 136:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF NORTH AMERICA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 137:
- VALUE SHARE OF REST OF NORTH AMERICA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 138:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 139:
- MOLLUSCICIDE MARKET BY COUNTRY, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 140:
- VALUE SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 141:
- VOLUME SHARE OF MOLLUSCICIDE BY COUNTRY, %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 142:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY ARGENTINA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 143:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY ARGENTINA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 144:
- VALUE SHARE OF ARGENTINA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 145:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY BRAZIL, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 146:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY BRAZIL, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 147:
- VALUE SHARE OF BRAZIL BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 148:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY CHILE, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 149:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY CHILE, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 150:
- VALUE SHARE OF CHILE BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 151:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF SOUTH AMERICA, METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 152:
- MOLLUSCICIDE CONSUMED BY REST OF SOUTH AMERICA, USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 153:
- VALUE SHARE OF REST OF SOUTH AMERICA BY CROP TYPE, %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 154:
- MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, GLOBAL, 2017-2022
- Figure 155:
- MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, GLOBAL, 2017-2022
- Figure 156:
- MARKET SHARE OF MAJOR PLAYERS, %, GLOBAL 2023
Molluscicide Industry Segmentation
Chemigation, Foliar, Fumigation, Soil Treatment are covered as segments by Application Mode. Commercial Crops, Fruits & Vegetables, Grains & Cereals, Pulses & Oilseeds, Turf & Ornamental are covered as segments by Crop Type. Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, North America, South America are covered as segments by Region.
- Globally, the use of molluscicide is expanding in various application modes. Foliar holds the major share value, accounting for 53.7% of the total molluscicide market in 2022. Demand for molluscicides in this segment is driven by increased snail infestation, particularly during the winter and rainy periods, and a need to improve yields and reduce losses due to snails and slugs.
- The demand for molluscicide chemicals in soil treatment methods is expected to register a CAGR of 4.8% during the forecast period (2023-2029) due to the effectiveness of the soil treatment method for molluscicides. The main molluscicide products used for the treatment of soil are metaldehyde, iron phosphate, methiocarb, sodium ferric ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and niclosamide.
- The chemigation segment in the molluscicide market is expected to grow at 4.6% CAGR from 2023 to 2029. The growth of this segment can be attributed to an increased area under drip irrigation systems, as well as a growing trend of the use of chemicals against snails or slugs using water management on these crops.
- The fumigation method's market value is expected to increase by USD 7.1 million during the forecast period (2023-2029). The market growth is expected to be stimulated by a growing awareness of the economic losses from mollusk damage in farmers and agricultural professionals, as well as the rising adoption of fumigation.
- Therefore, factors such as rising snail infestation, the growing area under irrigation, and increasing crop losses are driving the demand for molluscicide. The global molluscicide market is expected to grow at 4.9% CAGR during the forecast period from 2023 to 2029.
Application Mode | |
Chemigation | |
Foliar | |
Fumigation | |
Soil Treatment |
Crop Type | |
Commercial Crops | |
Fruits & Vegetables | |
Grains & Cereals | |
Pulses & Oilseeds | |
Turf & Ornamental |
Region | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Market Definition
- Function - Molluscicides are chemicals used to control or prevent mollusks from damaging the crop and prevent yield loss.
- Application Mode - Foliar, Seed Treatment, Soil Treatment, Chemigation, and Fumigation are the different type of application modes through which crop protection chemicals are applied to the crops.
- Crop Type - This represents the consumption of crop protection chemicals by Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds, Fruits, Vegetables, Turf, and Ornamental crops.
Keyword | Definition |
---|---|
IWM | Integrated weed management (IWM) is an approach to incorporate multiple weed control techniques throughout the growing season to give producers the best opportunity to control problematic weeds. |
Host | Hosts are the plants that form relationships with beneficial microorganisms and help them colonize. |
Pathogen | A disease-causing organism. |
Herbigation | Herbigation is an effective method of applying herbicides through irrigation systems. |
Maximum residue levels (MRL) | Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) is the maximum allowed limit of pesticide residue in food or feed obtained from plants and animals. |
IoT | The Internet of Things (IoT) is a network of interconnected devices that connect and exchange data with other IoT devices and the cloud. |
Herbicide-tolerant varieties (HTVs) | Herbicide-tolerant varieties are plant species that have been genetically engineered to be resistant to herbicides used on crops. |
Chemigation | Chemigation is a method of applying pesticides to crops through an irrigation system. |
Crop Protection | Crop protection is a method of protecting crop yields from different pests, including insects, weeds, plant diseases, and others that cause damage to agricultural crops. |
Seed Treatment | Seed treatment helps to disinfect seeds or seedlings from seed-borne or soil-borne pests. Crop protection chemicals, such as fungicides, insecticides, or nematicides, are commonly used for seed treatment. |
Fumigation | Fumigation is the application of crop protection chemicals in gaseous form to control pests. |
Bait | A bait is a food or other material used to lure a pest and kill it through various methods, including poisoning. |
Contact Fungicide | Contact pesticides prevent crop contamination and combat fungal pathogens. They act on pests (fungi) only when they come in contact with the pests. |
Systemic Fungicide | A systemic fungicide is a compound taken up by a plant and then translocated within the plant, thus protecting the plant from attack by pathogens. |
Mass Drug Administration (MDA) | Mass drug administration is the strategy to control or eliminate many neglected tropical diseases. |
Mollusks | Mollusks are pests that feed on crops, causing crop damage and yield loss. Mollusks include octopi, squid, snails, and slugs. |
Pre-emergence Herbicide | Preemergence herbicides are a form of chemical weed control that prevents germinated weed seedlings from becoming established. |
Post-emergence Herbicide | Postemergence herbicides are applied to the agricultural field to control weeds after emergence (germination) of seeds or seedlings. |
Active Ingredients | Active ingredients are the chemicals in pesticide products that kill, control, or repel pests. |
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) | The Department of Agriculture provides leadership on food, agriculture, natural resources, and related issues. |
Weed Science Society of America (WSSA) | The WSSA, a non-profit professional society, promotes research, education, and extension outreach activities related to weeds. |
Suspension concentrate | Suspension concentrate (SC) is one of the formulations of crop protection chemicals with solid active ingredients dispersed in water. |
Wettable powder | A wettable powder (WP) is a powder formulation that forms a suspension when mixed with water prior to spraying. |
Emulsifiable concentrate | Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) is a concentrated liquid formulation of pesticide that needs to be diluted with water to create a spray solution. |
Plant-parasitic nematodes | Parasitic Nematodes feed on the roots of crops, causing damage to the roots. These damages allow for easy plant infestation by soil-borne pathogens, which results in crop or yield loss. |
Australian Weeds Strategy (AWS) | The Australian Weeds Strategy, owned by the Environment and Invasives Committee, provides national guidance on weed management. |
Weed Science Society of Japan (WSSJ) | WSSJ aims to contribute to the prevention of weed damage and the utilization of weed value by providing the chance for research presentation and information exchange. |
Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence follows a four-step methodology in all our reports.
- Step-1: Identify Key Variables: In order to build a robust forecasting methodology, the variables and factors identified in Step-1 are tested against available historical market numbers. Through an iterative process, the variables required for market forecast are set and the model is built on the basis of these variables.
- Step-2: Build a Market Model: Market-size estimations for the forecast years are in nominal terms. Inflation is not a part of the pricing, and the average selling price (ASP) is kept constant throughout the forecast period.
- Step-3: Validate and Finalize: In this important step, all market numbers, variables and analyst calls are validated through an extensive network of primary research experts from the market studied. The respondents are selected across levels and functions to generate a holistic picture of the market studied.
- Step-4: Research Outputs: Syndicated Reports, Custom Consulting Assignments, Databases & Subscription Platforms