Middle-East Solar Power Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

In the Middle East solar power sector, JinkoSolar Holding, First Solar, and ACWA POWER BARKA set themselves apart by leveraging project scale, cutting-edge technology, and local alliances. Mordor Intelligence analysts find that these companies compete through regional customization, operational efficiency, and innovative partnerships. For full detailed analysis, see our Middle East Solar Power Report.

KEY PLAYERS
ACWA POWER BARKA SAOG Alsa Solar Systems LLC JinkoSolar Holding Co. Ltd First Solar Inc Enerwhere Sustainable Energy DMCC
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 Middle-East Solar Power Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    ACWA POWER BARKA SAOG

  • arrow

    Alsa Solar Systems LLC

  • arrow

    JinkoSolar Holding Co. Ltd

  • arrow

    First Solar Inc

  • arrow

    Enerwhere Sustainable Energy DMCC

Top Middle-East Solar Power Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Middle-East Solar Power Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Middle-East Solar Power players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

The MI Matrix can diverge from revenue based rankings because it weights execution signals that are visible before cash is recognized, and it penalizes weak regional delivery capacity. In Middle East solar PV, capability indicators that change outcomes include local content readiness, bankable warranty response, grid integration competence, and the ability to commission on schedule in extreme heat and dust. Recent Saudi PPAs and giga site build outs amplify those differences because a single delay can cascade across interconnection and financing milestones. Solar PV projects in the Gulf increasingly require storage, advanced inverters, and transmission upgrades, not just low cost modules. CSP still matters in select use cases where thermal storage and evening output are valued, but it competes against PV plus batteries on delivered energy and schedule certainty. For supplier and competitor evaluation, this MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is more useful than simple revenue tables because it reflects who can reliably deliver assets and support them across Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Oman.

MI Competitive Matrix for Middle-East Solar Power

The MI Matrix benchmarks top Middle-East Solar Power Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of Middle-East Solar Power Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

JinkoSolar Holding Co. Ltd.

Saudi localization is becoming a practical constraint, not a slogan, and JinkoSolar has moved early with a Saudi joint venture aimed at 10 GW of high efficiency cell and module production. That plan can shorten lead times for giga projects while also helping bidders meet local content expectations. This major supplier can win on bankability and desert performance, yet pricing pressure and execution timing could still compress returns if local ramp is slower than demand. If Saudi procurement tightens localization scoring, JinkoSolar likely gains. If trade rules change abruptly, inventory and warranty exposure becomes the key risk.

Leaders

ACWA POWER BARKA SAOG

Saudi PPAs are being signed at scale, and ACWA Power has recently highlighted both rapid financial closes and large solar additions tied to those contracts. That track record makes ACWA Power a top operator for utility projects where execution speed and bankable structuring decide winners. The Barka connection matters because Oman contract renewals can stabilize cash generation while capital is redeployed into new solar builds. If Saudi procurement keeps accelerating, ACWA can keep compounding a pipeline advantage through repeatable delivery. The key risk is construction bottlenecks, including workforce and logistics strain, which can erode schedule credibility as project sizes keep rising.

Leaders

Sungrow Power Supply Co. Ltd.

Grid stability is becoming a deciding factor as Saudi and UAE projects add storage, and Sungrow's Saudi activity includes a large storage agreement with Algihaz of up to 7.8 GWh. The company also disclosed a 2.1 GW inverter supply for the Al Shuaibah project, which reinforces utility scale credibility. As a top supplier in inverters and storage, Sungrow can win on commissioning speed and digital controls that reduce curtailment impacts. If Saudi procurement starts penalizing weak grid support, Sungrow gains. The main risk is execution quality across multi site rollouts, where firmware, cybersecurity, and spare parts discipline can become program level failure points.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

How should a buyer compare PV module suppliers for Gulf desert sites?

Focus on temperature behavior, soiling assumptions, and warranty enforcement terms in country. Also check local inventory, service staffing, and documented response times for failures.

What matters most when selecting an EPC or EPCM in the UAE?

Start with approval status and past delivery under DEWA or equivalent utility processes. Then confirm commissioning discipline, as built documentation quality, and O&M handover capability.

When does PV plus storage become essential in Saudi Arabia and the UAE?

It becomes essential when projects must deliver evening power or help the grid manage ramping. Storage also reduces curtailment risk and can improve system reliability for large zones.

What are the most common execution risks in giga scale solar builds?

Workforce constraints, long lead electrical equipment, and interconnection dependencies are common failure points. Dust management and cleaning strategy can also change output and O&M cost outcomes.

How can a buyer validate inverter and storage suppliers beyond datasheets?

Ask for commissioning references in Saudi or the UAE, plus on site spares strategy and firmware update governance. Confirm cybersecurity posture and local training for operators.

What is the practical difference between PV and CSP for Middle East projects?

PV is simpler to build and scales quickly, especially with trackers and batteries. CSP can provide thermal storage benefits, but it often carries higher complexity and longer construction timelines.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

Data Sourcing: Public sources were prioritized, including investor materials, exchange filings, and company press rooms. Private firm scoring relied on observable signals such as offices, certifications, and disclosed project activity. Indicators were kept in scope to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Oman, and the rest of the Middle East. When data was sparse, signals were triangulated across multiple credible references.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence & Reach

Local offices, factories, sites, and approved contractor status decide bid eligibility and response speed in Saudi, UAE, and Oman.

2
Brand Authority

Utility buyers and lenders prefer suppliers with proven desert reliability and clear warranty accountability under Gulf procurement norms.

3
Share

Relative position is inferred from repeated appearances in large PPAs, giga projects, and named supply awards inside the region.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operational Scale

Desert logistics, spares, commissioning teams, and grid interface management are decisive for on time COD on large PV builds.

2
Innovation & Product Range

PV plus storage controls, tracker robustness, and heat tolerant designs improve yield and reduce curtailment and O&M burden.

3
Financial Health / Momentum

Strong balance sheets and predictable cash flows support warranty reserves, performance guarantees, and long duration service obligations.