Top 5 India Organic Fertilizer Companies
Swaroop Agrochemical Industries
Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd
Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd
Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd
Coromandel International Ltd.
Source: Mordor Intelligence
India Organic Fertilizer Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key India Organic Fertilizer players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
This MI Matrix can differ from revenue based rankings because it weighs visible operating signals, not just sales totals. Companies with strong farmer reach, reliable availability, and compliant documentation can score higher even if their organic lines are still scaling. The clearest capability indicators here are distribution density, on ground advisory and demonstrations, evidence of product renewals and registrations, and the ability to manage bulky logistics without quality loss. Organic fertilizers in India increasingly sit at the intersection of residue sensitive exports, state led soil health mandates, and tighter product verification. Buyers also ask which firms can supply consistent compost and PROM at scale, and which ones can back biological claims after June 2025 enforcement changes. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence supports supplier and competitor evaluation better than revenue tables alone because it reflects delivery strength and portfolio readiness under real compliance pressure.
MI Competitive Matrix for India Organic Fertilizer
The MI Matrix benchmarks top India Organic Fertilizer Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of India Organic Fertilizer Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Coromandel International Ltd
Strong quarterly execution in 2025 reinforced confidence in its organic fertilizer push and its reach through rural outlets. It is a leading vendor in farm inputs and benefits when state agencies tighten soil health compliance and farmer advisory expectations. The upside scenario is a faster conversion of conventional buyers into blended organic programs, supported by its multi site manufacturing base and R&D depth. The main risk is bulky logistics and variable feedstock quality, which can disrupt season readiness and farmer trust.
KRIBHCO Cooperative Ltd
2025 partnership around mycorrhizal biofertilizer technology signals a clearer intent to grow soil biology offerings. As a major supplier via cooperative routes, it can scale adoption quickly when its member network aligns messaging and demonstrations. The what if scenario is faster export linked demand for residue managed crops, which could raise pull for compliant organic nutrient packages. The risk is slower field level behavior change, since benefits are gradual and require disciplined application.
Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd
FY 2024-25 performance narrative, plus higher sales in biofertilizers and Sagarika lines, supports confidence in scaling organic adjacent inputs. It is a top manufacturer with deep cooperative reach that can set informal standards for product claims and field demonstrations. The upside scenario is wider adoption of integrated packages that combine organics with measured efficiency products, especially in horticulture belts. The risk is reputational if quality variation appears across regions, since farmers compare results quickly within the same cooperative network.
Swaroop Agrochemical Industries
Certified organic offerings plus patented products signal an innovation first posture in farm inputs. It is a top manufacturer for bio organic inputs and can benefit when state agencies emphasize soil biology and measurable nutrient use efficiency. The upside case is faster expansion beyond its core belts through multi location manufacturing and lab supported advisory. The risk is regulatory scrutiny on product positioning, because India tightened controls on biostimulant approvals through mid 2025.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should I check first when selecting an organic fertilizer provider in India?
Check product registration status, batch traceability, and state level lab testing access. Also confirm local stocking points because transport delays can ruin product condition.
How do I compare compost, fermented organic manure, and PROM for my crop plan?
Compost and fermented inputs usually support soil organic matter building, while PROM targets phosphorus nutrition with slower release. Match the choice to soil test gaps and crop stage needs.
Why do some suppliers emphasize mycorrhiza and seaweed based inputs?
These can support root development and nutrient uptake, which matters when farmers reduce chemical intensity. Results depend on soil moisture, timing, and consistent application practices.
What is the biggest operational risk with organic fertilizers at scale?
Quality variation across batches and seasons is the biggest risk. Moisture control, odor issues, and contamination can trigger farmer complaints and returns.
How does tighter regulation change supplier selection after mid 2025?
It increases the value of clear labels, supporting data, and clean documentation. Suppliers that cannot maintain compliant claims may face delisting pressure.
What service capability matters most for horticulture focused buyers?
Field demonstrations and crop specific guidance matter most. Horticulture growers often expect faster visible improvements and will switch quickly if support is weak.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
We used company investor materials, annual reports, and official company websites first. We added reputable journalist coverage for dated developments and policy changes. For private firms, we relied on observable signals like sites, certifications, and distribution claims. When figures were limited, we triangulated using multiple independent sources.
Dealer and cooperative reach matters because bulky organic inputs fail without nearby stocking and repeat delivery capacity.
Trust is critical because farmers judge organics slowly and rely on known names for consistent outcomes.
Scale signals matter because larger volumes improve procurement economics for feedstock and reduce per unit logistics cost.
Composting, granulation, storage, and QA assets matter because organic inputs vary and need tighter batch control.
New organic blends, PROM formats, and mycorrhiza based offerings matter because crop responses differ by region and soil type.
Cash generation matters because organics need seasonal inventory builds and more field support than conventional products.
