India Industrial Automation Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

India's automation segment sees competition among global names like Siemens Ltd, ABB India, and Schneider Electric India, with each leveraging digital tools, specialized services, and local partnerships to gain an advantage. Leading companies differentiate through their advanced portfolios and adaptability. For broader insights, visit our India Industrial Automation Report.

KEY PLAYERS
ABB India Ltd Siemens Ltd (India) Schneider Electric India Pvt Ltd Rockwell Automation India Pvt Ltd Mitsubishi Electric India Pvt Ltd
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 India Industrial Automation Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    ABB India Ltd

  • arrow

    Siemens Ltd (India)

  • arrow

    Schneider Electric India Pvt Ltd

  • arrow

    Rockwell Automation India Pvt Ltd

  • arrow

    Mitsubishi Electric India Pvt Ltd

Top India Industrial Automation Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

India Industrial Automation Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key India Industrial Automation players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

The MI Matrix can diverge from simple size rankings because it weighs what buyers feel on the ground. Plant teams reward local delivery capacity, proven uptime, and how fast upgrades can be rolled out across multiple sites. Strong indicators include new India manufacturing lines, active training centers, repeat service contracts, and recent launches that reduce retrofit pain. Many leaders are asked two practical questions: who can shorten commissioning in brownfield retrofits, and who can keep OT networks safer as connectivity expands. In India, answers often depend on partner depth, spare parts reach, and software that works with mixed legacy equipment. The MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is more useful for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it aligns scoring to execution signals that directly affect plant risk, project speed, and lifecycle cost.

MI Competitive Matrix for India Industrial Automation

The MI Matrix benchmarks top India Industrial Automation Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of India Industrial Automation Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

Siemens Limited

Orders momentum in FY2025 highlights a strong installed base that keeps service pull steady across Indian plants. The company, a leading player, benefits when Make in India programs push new lines and when factories retrofit sensors and drives to cut energy use. Its tight integration between controls, electrification, and software reduces commissioning time when the customer standardizes. If private capex rebounds in 2026, factory digitization should accelerate. Key risk is uneven demand in short cycle automation plus rising OT security expectations for connected sites.

Leaders

ABB India Limited

Local manufacturing signals matter here because lead times often decide which vendor gets the project. The company, a major supplier, expanded a new variable speed drive module line at its Peenya site in Bengaluru in October 2025, citing about 25% added capacity and shorter delivery cycles. Energy efficiency regulations and carbon reporting pressure favor advanced drives, motors, and motion control upgrades in metals and cement sites. If Indian factories tighten power quality and uptime targets, ABB can bundle electrical plus automation in one scope. The main weakness is exposure to capex pauses that delay brownfield upgrades.

Leaders

Rockwell Automation India Pvt. Ltd.

Physical capacity in India is becoming a strategic asset, not just a cost decision. Rockwell said it will expand India operations and add manufacturing footprint, including a new Chennai facility that it framed as a platform for a larger campus approach. Rockwell, a top manufacturer, can convert this into faster delivery for controls and panels while scaling its software stack for pharma and packaging users. If Indian life sciences customers accelerate digital validation and traceability, Rockwell can attach more software to each install. Critical risk is execution slip during ramp up, which can hurt customer trust on delivery and after sales support.

Leaders

Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd.

Investment intensity is a practical proxy for commitment to Indian production and support capacity. Schneider, a leading vendor, signed an MoU for INR 718 crore investment in Tamil Nadu in December 2025 and also said it plans three additional plants in India. That footprint supports faster delivery of drives and electrical automation that many factories need for retrofit programs. If incentives under PLI keep pulling global supply chains into India, Schneider can capture more standardization wins with EcoStruxure style architectures. Key risk is spreading execution across too many new sites, which can dilute quality systems during fast hiring cycles.

Leaders

Honeywell Automation India Ltd.

Quarterly results show whether automation demand is translating into real project conversion. The company, a major player, reported higher quarterly profit and revenue growth in results published in November 2025, tied to improved order execution and stronger activity. Stricter requirements around emissions, safety, and documentation help its strengths in controls, sensing, and software for regulated factories. If energy transition projects scale in refineries and utilities, Honeywell can win repeat work through lifecycle services. Watch item is margin pressure when materials costs rise faster than contract repricing, which can limit appetite for fixed price turnkey commitments.

Leaders

Mitsubishi Electric India Pvt. Ltd.

Local build plus local software partnerships tend to be a strong combination in Indian factory upgrades. Mitsubishi Electric India, a top manufacturer, opened a smart manufacturing facility for factory automation systems in Talegaon in December 2023 with stated greenfield investment of 2,200 MINR. In January 2025 it also announced it would acquire a stake in an Indian software startup to develop no code data analysis and reporting applications for factory settings. If machine builders adopt modular lines to serve export demand, Mitsubishi can deepen pull through for PLCs, drives, and SCADA. The risk is slower than expected adoption outside core machine builder clusters.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

How should I choose an automation provider for a brownfield retrofit in India?

Prioritize vendors that can prove shutdown execution with references in similar plants. Ask for a phased cutover plan, spares strategy, and onsite response time commitments.

What signals show a vendor can support multi site rollouts across India?

Look for local manufacturing, regional service centers, and structured partner programs with training. Also check whether they can standardize software templates and alarm rationalization.

How do I evaluate OT cybersecurity readiness without becoming an expert?

Ask for a clear network zoning design, patch and backup routines, and incident response roles. Require documented access control and audit logs for remote support sessions.

When does it make sense to shift SCADA or MES to cloud or hybrid in India?

Hybrid often works best when latency sensitive control stays onsite and analytics go to cloud. Confirm data ownership, uptime targets, and how the site runs safely during link outages.

What is the most common reason automation projects miss timelines in Indian plants?

Late scope changes during commissioning, often driven by undocumented legacy wiring and unclear tag lists. A disciplined site survey and realistic factory acceptance testing reduce this risk.

How can buyers reduce capex pressure while still improving uptime?

Start with high return retrofits like drives, sensors, and condition monitoring on critical assets. Tie payments to measurable outcomes such as reduced downtime or energy reduction.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

We used company filings, investor updates, and official press rooms first, then credible journalist sources. Private firms were scored using contracts, site additions, and training footprint. When figures were missing, we triangulated with expansions, certifications, and delivery signals. We emphasized India tied evidence only.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence

India factories, engineering centers, partner reach, and service coverage decide who can deliver and support multi site rollouts.

2
Brand

Plant heads prefer names that auditors, insurers, and safety teams already trust for controls and site connectivity.

3
Share

Higher installed base creates pull through for spares, upgrades, and modernization programs across plants.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operations

Local production, panel capacity, labs, and field teams reduce lead time and improve uptime during shutdown windows.

2
Innovation

Post 2023 launches in drives, robotics, analytics, and retrofit tools determine who fits brownfield constraints.

3
Financials

India linked profitability and order conversion support long projects, warranty risk, and sustained service staffing.