Top 5 India Buy Now Pay Later Services Companies
Paytm Postpaid
LazyPay
Amazon Pay Later
MobiKwik ZIP
ZestMoney

Source: Mordor Intelligence
India Buy Now Pay Later Services Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key India Buy Now Pay Later Services players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can rank companies differently because it emphasizes what buyers feel day to day, not just past volumes. Some firms are strong on reach and familiarity, yet weaker on product continuity after policy shifts or partner pullbacks. Others look smaller on brand but execute well through assets, underwriting control, and reliable servicing. Many teams want to know whether credit line on UPI enables a pay later journey without creating wallet like compliance risks, and how fast platforms can adjust. Buyers also ask how to handle shutdowns, including repayment visibility, bureau reporting, and safe migration to new products. The MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence weighs rollout speed, reliability, and innovation signals, so it supports better supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone.
MI Competitive Matrix for India Buy Now Pay Later Services
The MI Matrix benchmarks top India Buy Now Pay Later Services Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of India Buy Now Pay Later Services Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Paytm Postpaid
2025 restart of credit line on UPI changes Paytm Postpaid's product story and risk posture. The platform is a major player benefiting from broad merchant acceptance, yet underwriting and collections discipline still shape outcomes more than app reach. In 2024, Paytm publicly signaled a pause in postpaid disbursals amid small ticket credit stress, which highlights downside risk if delinquencies rise again. If RBI scrutiny tightens on frictionless credit flows, Paytm can lean on partner bank rails and stronger disclosures, but it must protect trust while scaling.
LazyPay
Credit performance optics improved as PayU described a narrower loss profile in its credit business during 2025. LazyPay remains a leading service provider for app based deferred payments, with a clear path to defend volumes through tighter KYC and shorter exposure windows. If funding conditions worsen, the model can shift faster toward EMI like products and fewer risk segments. The key weakness is reliance on partner risk appetite and cost of funds, which can compress unit economics quickly when regulators raise expectations on unsecured credit.
Amazon Pay Later
Amazon's completion of the Axio acquisition in September 2025 strengthens control over underwriting and checkout finance execution in India. As a top player, it can pair high frequency commerce data with more predictable credit delivery, which typically improves approval accuracy and fraud defenses. Axio's lending scale signals operational depth for this strategy. If RBI approvals slow new product launches, Amazon can still compound advantage by improving conversion rates and repayment journeys. The main risk is concentration around platform behavior and regulatory expectations for transparency.
Flipkart Pay Later
RBI approval for Flipkart's NBFC arm in 2025 supports a shift from partner led credit to more direct control over product design. This major player can blend strong merchant demand with first party risk policies, which often improves unit economics over time. Flipkart plans to broaden lending offers, with BNPL positioned as part of that portfolio. If credit quality worsens in specific cohorts, Flipkart can tighten limits quickly, but it must avoid over correcting and hurting conversion on big sale events.
Capital Float (Axio)
Axio's acquisition close in 2025 gives the platform stronger distribution leverage while keeping an NBFC backbone. As a top manufacturer of checkout finance, it can improve approvals and fraud detection by using ecommerce signals, but it must show consistent borrower outcomes to preserve regulator comfort. If Amazon expands lending beyond checkout, Axio becomes more operationally important as the system of record for credit decisions. The critical risk is concentration on one ecosystem, since shifts in partner strategy can rapidly change volumes, staffing needs, and collections load.
Bajaj Finserv
Offline acceptance remains Bajaj Finserv's advantage when consumers want predictable EMIs at the point of purchase. This leading producer benefits from strong partner coverage in electronics and durable categories, with processes built for repeat borrowers. If regulators push for stronger fee transparency, Bajaj can absorb the change through standardized disclosures and mature servicing. The key opportunity is expanding pay later flows into smaller merchants, though the operational risk is sales driven mis selling complaints that can trigger remediation costs and partner friction.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should a merchant check before enabling pay later at checkout?
Confirm who the regulated lender is and how refunds, cancellations, and chargebacks are handled. Ask for clear fee tables and escalation paths for disputes.
How do RBI actions usually change pay later product design in India?
Providers tend to reduce ambiguity by strengthening disclosures, tightening KYC, and avoiding structures that resemble unlicensed payment flows. Many also shift users toward more standard EMI or bank issued credit rails.
What are the most common operational failure points in pay later programs?
Refund reversals, partial returns, and delayed statement generation create the highest complaint volume. Weak customer support during billing cycles can quickly damage repeat usage.
How can buyers compare fintech led versus bank led pay later options?
Fintech led options may optimize conversion and onboarding speed, while bank led options often offer stronger compliance routines and complaint handling. Compare approval rates, repayment flexibility, and how fast limits can be adjusted.
What early warning signs indicate a pay later partner may pull back?
Sudden tightening of limits, reduced merchant coverage, slower approvals, and changes in partner bank appetite are common signals. Rising delinquencies in short tenor products also tends to trigger rapid policy shifts.
What is a practical way to manage customer impact if a pay later product is discontinued?
Provide a clear final transaction date, a stable repayment path, and regular statements until closure. Ensure bureau reporting is accurate and give customers a documented grievance channel for disputes.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
We used public company sources, filings where available, and reputable business journalism and press rooms. Private firms were assessed using observable signals like launches, licensing, and distribution relationships. When direct India segment numbers were not available, we triangulated using in scope product disclosures and operational milestones. Scoring reflects India based deferred payment activity only.
Matters because checkout finance requires dense merchant coverage across online and in store acceptance points.
Matters because users must trust billing, refunds, and dispute handling for small ticket and high ticket pay later.
Matters because higher transaction scale improves risk models, fraud detection, and merchant pricing power in India.
Matters because regulated lending partners, servicing teams, and collections capacity determine reliability at scale.
Matters because credit line on UPI, cardless EMI, and embedded journeys have shifted product design since 2023.
Matters because funding cost, loss control, and profitability determine how long providers can sustain limits and approvals.
