What should I check first when selecting a glyphosate producer?

Start with registrations, impurity specification, and audit access to environmental controls. Then verify shipment history into your destination regions and peak-season on-time performance.

Which glyphosate salt is usually best for formulation flexibility?

Isopropylamine and potassium salts are common because they support many handling and compatibility needs. The right choice depends on your target crop labels, water quality, and tank-mix partners.

How do EU rules affect procurement plans outside Europe?

EU decisions often influence data packages and stewardship expectations used elsewhere. Approval continuity helps, but country-level restrictions can still tighten allowable use patterns and labeling.

How should I manage glyphosate-resistant weeds without abandoning glyphosate entirely?

Use rotation across modes of action and integrate residual herbicides where labels allow. Operationally, this favors suppliers that can provide both glyphosate and compatible partners with clear mixing guidance.

How do lawsuits and labeling risks change buying behavior for branded glyphosate?

They can shift volumes away from consumer channels and toward professional or agricultural channels with stronger documentation. Buyers often prefer suppliers that can demonstrate consistent labeling, stewardship training, and legal-risk containment.

What documents should I require from a supplier before contracting?

Ask for current registrations, SDS, COA with impurity limits, and traceability for each batch. Also request evidence of quality system controls and a clear change-notification process for formulation or sourcing changes.

Top Glyphosate Companies - Key Players & More

Bayer AG

Court and label dynamics shape Bayer's glyphosate decisions more than chemistry does today. The company, a leading brand in broad-spectrum weed control, has kept agricultural and professional glyphosate lines intact while shifting U.S. residential lawn and garden products to non-glyphosate actives starting in 2023 to reduce future claims. EU approval through 15 December 2033 supports continuity, but country-level restrictions still tighten use cases and documentation needs. If U.S. litigation protection improves, Bayer can lean back into branded positioning; if not, withdrawal threats remain credible. Rising legal reserves and case management remain the operational and financial risk center.

Leaders

Zhejiang Xinan (Wynca)

Capacity signals matter most for Wynca because buyers often treat technical supply as a reliability test. This major producer is repeatedly cited among China's concentrated glyphosate leaders, with technical capacity referenced around 80,000 tons and strong formulation conversion activity. Its differentiation is not branding but steadier shipment discipline and formulation mix, which can cushion price cycles when channel inventories swing. A plausible upside is tighter South America pull-through that rewards exporters with dependable loading windows. The key weakness is exposure to upstream feedstocks and environmental controls that can limit run rates quickly. Stronger documentation and impurity transparency would reduce switching risk for multinational customers.

Leaders

Corteva, Inc.

Trait pull-through is one of the few durable demand drivers left for glyphosate-based programs. Corteva, a leading company in agricultural innovation, launched Optimum GLY canola for the 2023 planting season in North America, reinforcing glyphosate-tolerant cropping systems. Its crop protection strategy also leans on premixes that explicitly keep glyphosate as a compatible tank-mix partner, which helps protect grower flexibility. If glyphosate use limits tighten in parts of Europe, Corteva can redirect emphasis toward integrated weed control packages tied to traits and residual chemistry. The operational risk is dependence on regulatory timing across many jurisdictions for labels and trait stewardship.

Leaders

Syngenta AG

Results in 2024 underline how much channel inventory correction can reshape purchasing patterns across commoditized actives. As a major player with broad crop protection reach, Syngenta's near-term leverage comes from downstream programs and tank-mix compatibility rather than from owning the lowest-cost technical molecule. EU approval through 2033 reduces one regulatory cliff, yet national restrictions can still disrupt timing, labeling, and stewardship requirements. If pricing pressure from generic capacity persists, Syngenta can protect value by bundling glyphosate with resistance-management guidance and digital agronomy. The operational risk is margin dilution when buyers rebaseline to tender-style sourcing.

Established

BASF SE

European production decisions can change perceived continuity even when customer demand stays stable. BASF, a top manufacturer in crop protection, has publicly restructured its glufosinate production network, signaling a stronger emphasis on alternative burn-down tools used alongside glyphosate programs. In the U.S., EPA approval of Liberty ULTRA in 2024 shows BASF's ability to refresh post-emergence offerings when weed resistance rises. If glyphosate restrictions expand in sensitive zones, BASF benefits from being positioned in adjacent solutions. The risk is execution complexity when supply chains shift from in-house production to external sourcing, which can pressure service levels.

Established

Zhejiang Jiangshan Agrochemical (Jiangshan Chemical Co.)

Project scale can become a competitive advantage only if it converts into consistent on-time exports. Jiangshan is a leading producer referenced in China's concentrated glyphosate set, and it has been linked with initiatives to expand glyphosate capacity and upgrade packaging and warehousing with smart systems. It has also been cited in China for glyphosate product positioning in transgenic corn and soybean field use cases, which signals a push into higher-visibility application segments. If South America demand spikes seasonally, Jiangshan benefits from port and logistics readiness. The operational risk is heavy capex paired with commodity price downturns that compress returns.

Established

UPL Ltd

Earnings recovery can be a stronger signal than a single product launch in a mature molecule category. UPL is a key supplier to broad acre farming systems, and it has pointed investors to margin improvement and demand normalization after a difficult destocking period. In parallel, it is expanding alternatives that complement or replace glyphosate in certain use cases, including aquatic weed management positioned as an option versus glyphosate. If regulators tighten buffer-zone and drift rules, UPL can sell more portfolio solutions instead of one active ingredient. The main risk is channel volatility, where distributors pause purchases and force abrupt production and logistics resets.

Performers

Albaugh LLC (Albaugh Group)

Distribution rights and registrations can be as valuable as reactors in a post-patent molecule. Albaugh is a U.S.-based private producer that acquired Corteva's straight-goods glyphosate business assets in March 2023, including registrations, formulations, and know-how across most countries outside Argentina. That move expands its ability to supply DMA salt formulations through established regional sales structures. If regulators tighten re-registration data requirements, Albaugh's acquired dossiers can shorten customer switching timelines. The key risk is integration burden across regions, where inconsistent label stewardship or supply handoffs can weaken hard-won distributor relationships. Operationally, private ownership can be a strength for speed, but it can limit transparency.

Performers

Jiangsu Good-Harvest (Good Harvest Weien Co.)

Registration breadth is often the fastest proxy for commercial seriousness in regulated crop systems. Good Harvest is a China-based manufacturer that has been described as expanding glyphosate formulation registrations, including proposed expanded use for glyphosate potassium salt solutions in transgenic corn and soybean fields during 2025 registration-change activity. EU approval continuity helps, but national restrictions still reward suppliers with better stewardship documentation and traceable impurity control. If gene-edited and herbicide-tolerant cropping expands, Good Harvest can gain volume through targeted field labels. The primary risk is that rapid portfolio expansion stretches quality systems, raising the chance of recalls or shipment holds.

Performers

FMC Corporation

Inventory levels, not end-user agronomy, have been the biggest determinant of near-term demand signals for FMC's distribution partners. This U.S.-based crop protection firm reported that customer inventories of its products reached targeted levels in most countries during early 2025, while revenue and adjusted EBITDA remained under pressure year over year. That matters for glyphosate buyers because channel normalization tends to restart routine purchasing, including straight goods used in broad-acre systems. If distributors rebuild working capital, FMC can regain planning stability and expand adjacent herbicide pairings. The critical risk is forecast whiplash that drives conservative procurement, which delays any rebound in formulation throughput.

Aspirants

Nufarm Ltd

Registration momentum often matters more than headline capacity when buyers need near-term label coverage. Nufarm is an Australia-based formulator with active label activity in North America, including EPA registrations in 2025 for updated herbicide formulations that explicitly note tank-mix compatibility with K-salt glyphosate. Regulatory tightening in Europe and sensitive-use bans in certain countries push Nufarm toward professional channels where documentation is stronger. If price floors strengthen, Nufarm can defend margins via packaged solutions rather than technical-only exposure. The key risk is reliance on external technical sourcing and shipping schedules, where disruptions immediately erode distributor confidence.

Aspirants

Jiangsu Yangnong Chemical (Sinochem Holdings)

Price compression can hide operational strength when plants run full and selling prices still fall. Yangnong is a China-based state-owned producer whose 2024 commentary has pointed to full-capacity glyphosate operations while advancing process upgrades tied to a major project. EU approval through 2033 reduces one barrier, yet country-by-country limits still increase compliance costs for exporters. If the upgrade improves impurity control and environmental performance, Yangnong can win more regulated-destination orders. The main weakness is earnings sensitivity to the global price cycle, which can constrain reinvestment during downturns.

Aspirants

Bharat Rasayan

Earnings swings can signal exposure to commodity cycles and working-capital stress more than demand collapse. Bharat Rasayan is an India-based manufacturer that reported improved profit after tax in the year ended March 31, 2025 versus the prior year in published director-report financial tables. For glyphosate buyers, the practical question is consistency of specification and shipment cadence into regulated destinations, not just quarterly profitability. If India expands export-driven agrochemical manufacturing incentives, Bharat Rasayan could scale select actives more quickly. The operational risk is concentration in a few products and the need to keep environmental compliance and effluent systems ahead of tightening rules, which can interrupt plant utilization unexpectedly.

Aspirants

King Quenson Industry (King Quenson Group)

Product positioning shows where smaller firms try to win when scale is hard to match. King Quenson is a China-based formulation supplier that promotes glufosinate-P offerings and explicitly frames them against glyphosate costs and glyphosate-resistant weed pressure. That is relevant because restrictions or resistance can shift demand away from straight glyphosate in specific acres, creating openings for adjacent products. If drift-mitigation rules tighten in the U.S., suppliers that can support clearer use directions may gain faster adoption. The key weakness is limited proof of large multi-region registrations and supply assurance, which makes big distributors cautious.

Aspirants

Glyphosate Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

Top 5 Glyphosate Companies

Glyphosate Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

MI Competitive Matrix for Glyphosate

Analysis of Glyphosate Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Bayer AG

Zhejiang Xinan (Wynca)

Corteva, Inc.

Syngenta AG

BASF SE

Zhejiang Jiangshan Agrochemical (Jiangshan Chemical Co.)

UPL Ltd

Albaugh LLC (Albaugh Group)

Jiangsu Good-Harvest (Good Harvest Weien Co.)

FMC Corporation

Nufarm Ltd

Jiangsu Yangnong Chemical (Sinochem Holdings)

Bharat Rasayan

King Quenson Industry (King Quenson Group)

Frequently Asked Questions

Methodology

Analysis of Leading Glyphosate Companies