Top 5 Insect Protein Companies
Ynsect NL B.V. (Spryng)
Protenga
Darling Ingredients Inc.
nextProtein
Protix B.V.

Source: Mordor Intelligence
Insect Protein Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Insect Protein players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can diverge from simple size rankings because it weights site readiness, buyer trust, and near term delivery more than headline growth claims. Some firms score well on visibility and relationships, while their buildouts are still ramping. Others show strong technical progress, yet operate with tighter financing or narrower geography. Insect protein buyers usually ask two practical questions first: can you ship consistent specs every month, and can you prove compliance for substrates and processing. Strong indicators include recent regulatory allowances, validated offtake contracts, automation maturity, and repeatable QA systems. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation because it links what buyers feel to what operators can deliver, not just scale narratives.
MI Competitive Matrix for Insect Protein
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Insect Protein Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Insect Protein Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Darling Ingredients Inc.
Financial resilience remains the clearest differentiator for this platform in insect based inputs. Darling Ingredients sells black soldier fly derived products under the EnviroFlight brand, including larvae meal, oil, and frass positioned for feed and plant nutrition buyers. With FY 2024 net sales of USD 5.7 billion reported in February 2025, the company brings balance sheet stamina that helps sustain longer payback buildouts. If tighter feed rules raise compliance costs, it can absorb QA and documentation spend better than smaller peers. The operational risk is internal capital competition with larger business lines, which can slow insect capacity decisions.
nextProtein
Scale decisions are now tied to financing discipline, not just technology claims. nextProtein raised EUR 18.0 million in a 2025 Series B to expand Tunisia capacity, with a second facility planned to produce 12,000 tonnes of insect based ingredients annually, including 2,500 tonnes of protein flour. That pushes execution toward lower unit costs, which matters as buyers compare against fishmeal and soy. If the new site hits targeted uptime by 2027, the brand becomes a dependable regional anchor for Mediterranean feed supply. The main risk is ramp timing and wastewater or odor controls that can trigger permitting delays.
Protix B.V.
Feed customers often reward proof offtake partners, and that is the clearest strength here. Protix, a leading vendor, secured a 2023 partnership with Tyson Foods that included a planned US insect ingredient facility for animal feed uses, expanding credibility with large protein groups. That regulatory framing also helps reduce consumer confusion, because the tie up is positioned around pets, aquaculture, and livestock feed inputs. If the US build proceeds on schedule, it improves proximity to North American buyers and waste feedstock streams. The main operational risk is construction and commissioning execution in a tighter US permitting environment.
Innovafeed
Operational scale is visible in both assets and partner integration, which tends to reduce buyer friction. Innovafeed opened a North American Insect Innovation Center in Decatur, Illinois in April 2024 with ADM, framing it as a step toward broader North American expansion. Recent coverage also describes a highly automated France site that converts large waste streams into protein, oil, and fertilizer outputs, which supports repeatable quality. If regulators tighten emissions and waste reporting for feed inputs, its co location approach with large processors can strengthen compliance. The risk is energy and logistics dependence at integrated sites, where interruptions can ripple quickly.
Entobel Holding Pte. Ltd
Large contracts are more believable when the plant is already running, not just announced. Entobel opened a large Vietnam facility and stated annual capacity of 10,000 metric tons of insect protein, which supports real offtake discussions. In 2024 it expanded collaboration with Vinh Hoan, including commitments described as 15,000 metric tons annually during 2025 to 2027, which signals demand visibility. If aquaculture producers increase inclusion rates, Entobel is positioned to benefit through volume pull. The most material risk is feedstock continuity and biosecurity during monsoon driven supply disruptions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should I require before approving an insect protein ingredient for animal feed?
Ask for clear regulatory status by country, plus a stable specification sheet and batch level traceability. Require contaminant testing cadence and a defined change control process for substrates.
How do I compare black soldier fly protein versus mealworm or cricket inputs?
Black soldier fly is usually positioned for feed and pet food due to scalable waste upcycling and fat profiles. Mealworm and cricket can fit human food uses more often, but cost and volume can be tighter.
What are the biggest operational risks with insect farms at scale?
Energy reliability, biosecurity, and feedstock continuity can disrupt growth cycles quickly. Commissioning delays also matter because buyers often qualify formulas to a specific supplier process.
Which proofs matter most when selecting a supplier for aquaculture or pet food?
Look for consistent monthly shipments, repeatable digestibility data, and documented QA systems that match your audit needs. Offtake agreements and co located feedstock partners can reduce supply shocks.
How do regulations in Europe affect adoption for poultry and pigs?
EU rules have allowed insect processed animal proteins for poultry and pig feed, which supports broader demand. Local interpretation and labeling still vary, so buyers often manage compliance country by country.
Why can insect proteins struggle to win on cost, even when sustainability is strong?
Climate control, drying, and processing costs can dominate the unit economics at early scale. Cost competitiveness improves when feedstock is contracted cheaply and automation lifts labor productivity.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Sources prioritize company investor materials, official press rooms, filings, and reputable journalism. Private firms are assessed via facilities, contracts, certifications, and expansion evidence. Indicators are kept within the scoped applications and geographies. When data is missing, signals are triangulated across multiple credible references.
Production and distribution footprint near aquafeed, pet food, and food formulators reduces freight cost and speeds trials.
Recognized names ease regulatory discussions and shorten qualification cycles with feed mills and pet food QA teams.
Relative position inferred from disclosed capacity, offtake signals, and contracted volumes in insect meal, oil, and frass.
Dedicated farms, processing lines, and co located feedstock agreements determine uptime and monthly shipment reliability.
New rearing automation, traceability, and post 2023 ingredient formats improve inclusion rates and pricing power.
Ability to fund ramp and survive price swings matters where energy and compliance costs are high.
