Top 5 Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Companies
China Jushi Co. Ltd
Johns Manville
Owens Corning
PPG Industries Inc.
Advanced Composites Inc.
Source: Mordor Intelligence
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can diverge from revenue rank lists because it reflects how reliably a company can deliver the right products, in the right places, under changing constraints. It weighs signals like facility commitment, qualification depth, pace of new grade introductions since 2023, and demonstrated ability to absorb cost or regulatory shocks. It also reflects operational resilience, such as furnace rebuild execution, footprint changes, and evidence of sustained investment in plant modernization. For GFRP procurement, two practical needs stand out: selecting suppliers that can meet wind blade volume ramps without quality drift, and selecting resin systems that meet fire, smoke, and durability requirements for infrastructure and transport parts. The MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it ties performance to observable capabilities, not just size.
MI Competitive Matrix for Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
BASF SE
Material footprint matters most when compounders must support multiple resin families across regions. BASF, a leading company in chemicals, highlighted partial use of lower footprint glass fibers in its Ultramid A and B compound portfolio in May 2024, tying reinforcement sourcing to product carbon footprint reductions. Regulation that tightens lifecycle disclosure can help BASF with buyers needing verified footprint data, but it can also expose supplier gaps. If automotive programs pivot faster to recycled content, BASF can lean on supplier partnerships and qualification depth. The operational risk is that specialty reinforcement inputs can tighten abruptly, forcing reformulation and requalification delays.
China Jushi Co. Ltd
Investment pace is a clear signal when buyers worry about future supply. China Jushi, a leading producer of glass fiber, launched major carbon neutral base construction steps in Huai'an in February 2023 and followed with phase II construction in February 2025, including a 100,000 ton electronic glass fiber line with supporting wind power plans. Regulation that rewards lower carbon inputs can directly favor these projects if verification is credible. If wind blade volumes in North America tighten supply, Jushi can redirect volumes across bases, but logistics and trade actions remain swing factors. The biggest risk is commissioning delays, because large furnace projects can slip and ripple through customer schedules.
Chongqing Polycomp International Corp. (CPIC)
Public capacity disclosures reduce uncertainty for large program sourcing decisions. CPIC, a major producer of glass fiber, has been described in late 2025 coverage as having glass fiber yarn capacity above 1.2 million tons and broad use across wind, automotive, and electronics applications. The company is also running modernization efforts tied to electronic grade production line upgrades and digital efficiency projects at its sites. If electronics demand tightens specs for low defect glass cloth, these upgrades could lift realized pricing. A critical risk is energy and compliance cost volatility, since furnace operations are exposed to utilities and local constraints.
Johns Manville
Operational upgrades in Europe can matter as much as new capacity in Asia. Johns Manville, a top manufacturer of continuous filament glass fiber, highlighted investments that included a furnace rebuild and restart in Trnava, Slovakia, plus automation enhancements to support European sales and operations. Rules that restrict landfill and push waste reduction can favor manufacturers that reduce internal scrap and improve yield. If infrastructure corrosion concerns keep rising, JM can defend position through consistent fiber quality and broad downstream conversion ties. The critical risk is furnace execution, because rebuild timing and ramp quality can affect output for months.
Owens Corning
Portfolio actions can reshape buyer options faster than technical roadmaps do. Owens Corning, a major player in glass reinforcements, disclosed in 2025 communications that its glass reinforcements business sits within its Composites segment and that it entered an agreement to sell the glass reinforcements business, while retaining other composite related operations. Policy driven demand for domestic sourcing can still favor remaining US melt assets that feed other internal lines. If ownership change brings focused investment, service could improve for core reinforcement grades. The operational risk is transition execution, because separation can disrupt planning, staffing, and customer support.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should I require from a GFRP supplier for wind blade applications?
Ask for stable fiber sizing control, traceable lots, and proven kitting or fabric handling discipline. Require documented defect limits and clear change control for any formulation adjustments.
How do I compare polyester, vinyl ester, and epoxy systems for structural parts?
Polyester often fits cost sensitive parts with moderate performance needs. Vinyl ester and epoxy usually fit higher fatigue, chemical resistance, or stricter durability targets, but qualification takes longer.
Which process route is best for my part: manual layup, compression, continuous, or injection?
Manual methods fit low volumes and complex shapes but depend heavily on labor skill. Compression and injection fit higher volume repeat parts, while continuous processes fit beams, profiles, and rebar.
What certifications and documentation matter most in supplier selection?
Look for quality system certifications, controlled test methods, and consistent lot traceability. For regulated programs, require audited procedures for change control and nonconformance handling.
How should I think about recycling and end of life constraints?
Plan early for collection, separation, and disposal costs, especially for large structures. Favor designs that reduce resin content, enable reuse of cores, or simplify teardown where practical.
What sourcing risks matter most across regions?
Energy price swings and trade actions can change delivered costs quickly. Dual sourcing, regional stocking, and pre-approved alternates can reduce downtime during sudden disruptions.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Inputs use company investor materials, SEC filings, and company press rooms, plus selective third-party journalism where needed. Private firms use observable signals like site changes, certifications, and published capabilities. When direct segment metrics are missing, scoring triangulates capacity, footprint, and announced investments. All scoring is limited to the defined scope.
Local melt, compounding, stitching, or fabrication sites reduce lead times and improve project support across wind, autos, and infrastructure.
Recognized names shorten qualification cycles for safety critical parts like rebar, electrical housings, and blade structures.
Higher GFRP position signals proven demand pull and longer buyer lists across resin types, fiber forms, and end uses.
Furnaces, compounding lines, kitting, and molding assets determine whether volume ramps can be met without shortages.
New grades, low footprint inputs, and process enabling materials since 2023 expand eligible applications and improve total installed cost.
Scoped earnings strength supports capex, warranty support, and stable pricing through energy, logistics, and compliance volatility.
