Genomics In Cancer Care Market Size and Share

Genomics In Cancer Care Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Genomics In Cancer Care Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

Genomics in the cancer care market size in 2026 is estimated at USD 28.44 billion, growing from 2025 value of USD 24.5 billion with 2031 projections showing USD 59.78 billion, growing at 16.05% CAGR over 2026-2031. The surge reflects sustained technology innovation, harmonized regulation, and expanding clinical validation that make genomic testing central to precision oncology. Broader Medicare reimbursement for liquid biopsy, falling sequencing costs that bring whole-genome testing close to the USD 100 threshold, and rapid integration of artificial-intelligence decision tools are reshaping therapeutic strategies toward proactive, molecularly guided care. Competitive intensity accelerates as platform vendors converge with analytics specialists, and as single-molecule, real-time sequencing begins to erode short-read NGS dominance. Together, these dynamics reinforce a structural transition from one-off diagnostic assays to longitudinal, data-rich solutions that inform every stage of the oncology journey.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, instruments led with 37.80% revenue share in 2025, while services are projected to grow at an 18.35% CAGR through 2031.
  • By technology, genome sequencing commanded 45.70% of the genomics in cancer care market share in 2025, and single-molecule real-time sequencing is advancing at a 22.85% CAGR to 2031.
  • By application, diagnostics held 52.00% of the genomics in cancer care market size in 2025; minimal-residual-disease monitoring and liquid biopsy is expanding at a 20.65% CAGR.
  • By end-user, hospitals and cancer centers accounted for 41.10% of the genomics in cancer care market size in 2025, while reference and clinical laboratories are rising at a 17.35% CAGR.
  • By geography, North America contributed 36.60% market share in 2025, and Asia-Pacific posted the fastest regional CAGR at 14.55%.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Services Drive Growth Despite Instruments Dominance

Instruments represented the largest revenue pool, holding 37.80% share of the genomics in the cancer care market in 2025. Demand reflected ongoing platform refresh cycles as users swapped legacy sequencers for higher-throughput, longer-read systems. Consumables sales expanded in line with test-volume growth, while point-of-care cartridges opened new, decentralized channels.

Services are accelerating at an 18.35% CAGR, underscoring a shift toward data interpretation, cloud analytics, and integrated clinical reporting. Guardant Health’s 31% revenue jump to USD 737 million during 2024 shows the pull of recurring testing and bioinformatics fees. Hospitals increasingly outsource bioinformatics to mitigate staffing shortages, and bundled, end-to-end service contracts now cover sample logistics, sequencing, interpretation, and decision-support updates. This evolution positions service providers as strategic partners rather than transactional suppliers within the genomics in cancer care market.

Genomics in Cancer Care Market: Market Share by Product Type, 2025
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Genomics in Cancer Care Market: Market Share by Product Type, 2025

By Technology: Single-Molecule Sequencing Disrupts NGS Dominance

Genome sequencing platforms based on short-read NGS secured 45.70% market share in 2025, supported by established laboratory workflows and extensive clinical evidence. Yet single-molecule, real-time sequencing is expanding at a startling 22.85% CAGR as oncologists seek structural-variant resolution in repeat-rich regions and methylation layers unavailable from short reads.

Oxford Nanopore’s latest chemistry generated complete chromosome assemblies and simultaneous epigenetic maps, demonstrating the clinical readiness of long-read approaches. Meanwhile, Roche’s sequencing-by-expansion prototypes promise to merge long reads with high throughput, threatening to redraw product-replacement cycles. PCR-based kits retain value for low-plex companion diagnostics and rapid EGFR or KRAS checks, yet microarrays are ceding ground as sequencing prices near parity. Technology diversity ensures that laboratories can align platform choice with specific oncology use cases inside the genomics in cancer care market.

By Application: MRD Monitoring Accelerates Beyond Diagnostics

Diagnostics maintained 52.00% of the genomics in the cancer care market size in 2025 through entrenched companion-diagnostic pathways and payer familiarization. Routine EGFR, BRAF, and PIK3CA panels anchor laboratory revenue streams. 

Minimal-residual-disease and liquid-biopsy assays, growing at a 20.65% CAGR, are redefining follow-up protocols. The SERENA-6 trials verified that ctDNA-guided treatment switches halve the progression risk for ER-positive breast-cancer patients with emergent ESR1 mutations. Pharma sponsors now embed MRD endpoints in adjuvant-therapy trials, which reinforce assay volumes post-approval. Drug-discovery genomics and precision-oncology decision platforms further enlarge the pipeline, supplying biomarker insights during early clinical development and supporting adaptive trial designs.

By End-user: Reference Labs Gain Share Through Specialized Capabilities

Hospitals and cancer centers generated 41.10% of 2025 revenue, leveraging on-site pathology and integrated care teams to run high-throughput panels for newly diagnosed patients. Yet reference and clinical laboratories exhibit the fastest momentum at 17.35% CAGR, bolstered by economies of scale and capital-intensive automation that lower per-sample costs.

Labcorp’s partnership with Ultima Genomics to expand whole-genome offerings and to launch Plasma Detect ctDNA MRD illustrates reference labs’ strategic positioning. Pharmaceutical and biotech firms intensify demand for high-complexity assays to stratify trial subjects, while academic institutes pilot novel technologies before broader rollout. Together, these segments create a complementary ecosystem in which centralized expertise coexists with bedside sequencing in the genomics market for cancer care.

Genomics in Cancer Care Market: Market Share by End User
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Genomics in Cancer Care Market: Market Share by End User

Geography Analysis

North America led with 36.60% market share in 2025, supported by broad payer coverage, a mature clinical-trial network, and stringent but predictable regulatory oversight. The FDA’s May 2024 Laboratory Developed Tests final rule aligned quality requirements across commercial and academic laboratories. Parallel Medicare decisions extended reimbursement to liquid-biopsy-based MRD surveillance, unlocking sizable, recurring test volumes. Cross-industry collaborations ensure rapid migration of research innovations into front-line clinical practice, consolidating the region’s leadership in the genomics in cancer care market.

Asia Pacific records the fastest regional CAGR at 14.55% to 2031. National genome programs in China, Japan, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates underpin large-scale sequencing infrastructure and create fertile ground for early screening pilots. Ongoing investment in Saudi Arabia’s precision-medicine corridor, combined with streamlined regulatory pathways in the United Arab Emirates, attracts multinational diagnostics firms to establish regional hubs. Rising cancer incidence and widening insurance coverage accelerate demand, while local manufacturing partnerships drive down consumables’ costs, improving accessibility.

Europe remains a critical pillar of global adoption through coordinated regulatory and value-assessment frameworks. The European Commission’s conditional approval of Illumina’s divestment plan for GRAIL removed a legal logjam, restoring competitive balance and allowing pan-European multi-cancer screening pilots to proceed. Meanwhile, the EU In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation enforces stringent clinical-evidence requirements, boosting confidence among physicians and payers. Standard-setting bodies such as the European Liquid Biopsy Society publish harmonized protocols that foster reproducibility across laboratories. In combination, these measures sustain healthy growth despite mature infrastructure.

Genomics In Cancer Care Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Regulatory Landscape

Regulation for genomics in cancer care continues to tighten around test validity, software and bioinformatics controls, and clinical evidence. In the United States, FDA device classifications and special controls have been applied to sequencing constituents (including whole-exome-sequencing-related devices, effective September 2024), while 21 CFR 866.6080 sets expectations for labeling and limitations around the clinical significance of findings for NGS-based tumor profiling tests. Reimbursement policy also shapes adoption, with CMS maintaining national coverage for NGS testing for Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer when performed in CLIA-certified laboratories.

Outside the United States, national health systems are formalizing pathways that move genomics from pilots into routine care. Cancer Australia released its National Framework for Genomics in Cancer Control in January 2025 to guide equitable access and implementation, and NHS England announced a national genetic register in January 2026 to support systematic follow-up and targeted screening for inherited cancer risk. In Europe, the EMA updated its Qualification of Novel Methodologies guidance (Revision 6, June 2026), reinforcing structured evidence generation for emerging methodologies used in medicinal product development and companion diagnostic-enabled precision oncology.

Value Chain Analysis

The value chain covers assay and platform design (sequencing chemistry, library prep, and panel design), instrument and reagent manufacturing (sequencers, PCR systems, consumables), and sample acquisition and preparation (tissue and liquid biopsy workflows, including FFPE processing). It then moves through analytical validation and clinical deployment in CLIA/ISO-aligned laboratories, bioinformatics and reporting (pipelines, variant interpretation, AI-driven decision support), and downstream clinical action (tumor boards, therapy selection, MRD monitoring, and longitudinal data management). Distribution is increasingly hybrid, combining direct sales of instruments and kits with sequencing-as-a-service, cloud analytics subscriptions, and enterprise contracts with hospitals, cancer centers, and reference laboratories.

Recent partnerships show where value accrues and where bottlenecks persist. Illumina expanded its collaboration with Labcorp in March 2026 to co-commercialize distributed IVD kits (including PGDx elio plasma focus Dx and TruSight Oncology Comprehensive), while Illumina also partnered with PREMIA to widen CGP access within Taiwan provider networks that already integrated CGP into national coverage in 2024. On the analytics side, SOPHiA GENETICS collaborations with MD Anderson (January 2026) and an MOU with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (June 2026) highlight the growing role of platform-based data interpretation hubs. Workflow-enablement initiatives such as PacBio and Covaris (April 2026) target the large installed base of FFPE tumor samples, while CellCarta and Pillar Biosciences (April 2026) use kitted NGS panels to reduce trial screening friction across distributed laboratory networks.

Competitive Landscape

The genomics in the cancer care market is moderately consolidated. Illumina, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Roche hold multi-platform portfolios that span instruments, consumables, and software, granting them pricing leverage and global distribution reach. Specialized providers such as Guardant Health and Exact Sciences outpace the field in liquid-biopsy and MRD niches, leveraging protected assay patents and large proprietary datasets.

Mergers and acquisitions intensified in 2024–2025 as incumbents sought AI analytics, multi-omic fusion capabilities, and regional market entry. 

Examples include Guardant Health’s agreement with Pfizer to co-develop therapy-linked diagnostics and PacBio’s release of the benchtop Vega system aimed at decentralizing HiFi sequencing. Litigation has also emerged as a competitive instrument; Guardant filed suit against Tempus AI alleging infringement of DNA-testing patents.

Players are now prioritizing vertical integration, pairing wet-lab kits with real-time analytics delivered through cloud dashboards. Intellectual-property filings concentrate on chemistry that improves read accuracy and on machine-learning pipelines that cut interpretation time. Emerging white spaces include point-of-care sequencing for community oncology clinics, AI-driven molecular tumor boards, and turnkey solutions tailored to low-resource settings.

Genomics In Cancer Care Industry Leaders

  1. Agilent Technologies

  2. Illumina, Inc.

  3. Pacific Biosciences, Inc.

  4. ThermoFisher Scientific Inc.

  5. Intrexon Bioinformatics Germany GmbH

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Genomics in Cancer Care Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

A major opportunity is the shift from episodic, single-timepoint profiling to longitudinal blood-based monitoring integrated into routine oncology workflows. Quest Diagnostics expanded access to its Haystack MRD ctDNA test and comprehensive genomic profiling by integrating ordering into Flatiron Healths OncoEMR for community oncology clinicians (July 2026), which lowers operational friction for repeat testing and supports broader use of MRD beyond large academic centers. Platform vendors and labs also have whitespace to package end-to-end services that address the shortage of accredited molecular pathologists by combining wet-lab execution with automated interpretation and report generation tools.

Multi-cancer early detection and ultra-sensitive MRD are also creating room for whole-genome and transcriptome-informed offerings paired with AI interpretation. Caris Life Sciences launched Caris Detect, a multi-cancer early detection blood test using ultra-deep WGS, WTS, and AI (July 2026), while GRAIL presented PATHFINDER 2 data at ASCO 2026 across 35,878 participants showing Galleri increased cancer detection 6.5-fold when added to standard screening. In MRD, Ultima Genomics presented TRACERx data at AACR 2026 describing ppmSeq performance with a 95% limit of detection below 3 parts per million, reinforcing demand for high-sensitivity approaches that broaden liquid biopsy into earlier disease settings and tighter recurrence surveillance. Together, these signals point to continued investment in distributed IVD kit strategies, automation, and data platforms that can scale interpretation and compliance across geographies.

Recent Industry Developments

  • July 2026: Agilent Technologies received FDA approval for the PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay as a companion diagnostic supporting nivolumab-based indications in gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal cancers. The expanded CDx positioning strengthens standardized immuno-oncology testing on automated platforms and supports more consistent biomarker-driven therapy selection across laboratories.
  • March 2026: Illumina expanded its collaboration with Labcorp to advance precision oncology, including co-commercialization of distributed IVD test kits such as PGDx elio plasma focus Dx and TruSight Oncology Comprehensive. The move supports broader access to tissue and liquid biopsy testing by pushing validated kits into more lab settings rather than relying solely on centralized testing models.
  • November 2024: Pacific Biosciences unveiled the benchtop Vega system, extending HiFi sequencing to smaller laboratories. By lowering footprint and access barriers for long-read sequencing, the launch supported decentralization of higher-resolution genomic characterization beyond large reference labs.

Table of Contents for Genomics In Cancer Care Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Burden Of Cancer & Earlier Screening Programs
    • 4.2.2 Increasing Adoption Of NGS-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling
    • 4.2.3 Rapid Cost Decline Of Sequencing & Digital PCR Reagents
    • 4.2.4 Scaling Liquid-Biopsy Pipelines For Minimal-Residual-Disease (MRD) Monitoring
    • 4.2.5 AI-Powered Multi-Omic Decision-Support Tools For Oncologists
    • 4.2.6 Rise Of Reimbursement For Tumor-Agnostic Companion Diagnostics
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Shortage Of Accredited Molecular Pathologists
    • 4.3.2 Persistently High Total-Cost-Of-Ownership For WGS Platforms
    • 4.3.3 Cyber-Security & Genomic-Data-Sovereignty Regulation
    • 4.3.4 Limited Clinical-Utility Evidence For Emerging MRD Assays
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Instruments
    • 5.1.2 Consumables
    • 5.1.3 Services
  • 5.2 By Technology
    • 5.2.1 Genome Sequencing
    • 5.2.2 PCR
    • 5.2.3 Microarrays &
    • 5.2.4 Others
  • 5.3 By Application
    • 5.3.1 Diagnostics
    • 5.3.2 Drug Discovery & Clinical Trials Genomics
    • 5.3.3 Personalized / Precision Oncology
    • 5.3.4 Others
  • 5.4 By End-user
    • 5.4.1 Hospitals & Cancer Centres
    • 5.4.2 Reference & Clinical Laboratories
    • 5.4.3 Pharmaceutical & Biotech Companies
    • 5.4.4 Academic & Research Institutes
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.5 Australia
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Illumina Inc.
    • 6.3.2 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
    • 6.3.3 F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
    • 6.3.4 Agilent Technologies Inc.
    • 6.3.5 QIAGEN NV
    • 6.3.6 Pacific Biosciences of California Inc.
    • 6.3.7 Guardant Health Inc.
    • 6.3.8 Exact Sciences Corporation
    • 6.3.9 Foundation Medicine Inc.
    • 6.3.10 Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc
    • 6.3.11 Myriad Genetics Inc.
    • 6.3.12 Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.
    • 6.3.13 GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
    • 6.3.14 PerkinElmer Inc.
    • 6.3.15 BGI Genomics Co. Ltd.
    • 6.3.16 Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.
    • 6.3.17 Personalis Inc.
    • 6.3.18 Invitae Corporation
    • 6.3.19 10x Genomics Inc.
    • 6.3.20 Burning Rock Biotech Ltd.
    • 6.3.21 Natera Inc.

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
**Competitive Landscape covers- Business Overview, Financials, Products and Strategies, and Recent Development

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definition and Coverage

This market covers revenues linked to using genomic information in cancer care, meaning testing and analysis that support diagnosis, stratification, monitoring, and treatment selection in oncology settings, plus the related instruments, consumables, and service fees used to deliver these results.

Scope exclusions: We exclude non-cancer genomics, animal genomics, and routine hereditary screening that is not tied to an oncology care pathway.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product Type
    • Instruments
    • Consumables
    • Services
  • By Technology
    • Genome Sequencing
    • PCR
    • Microarrays &
    • Others
  • By Application
    • Diagnostics
    • Drug Discovery & Clinical Trials Genomics
    • Personalized / Precision Oncology
    • Others
  • By End-user
    • Hospitals & Cancer Centres
    • Reference & Clinical Laboratories
    • Pharmaceutical & Biotech Companies
    • Academic & Research Institutes
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Data Sources, Market Sizing, and Validation

Desk Research

Desk research was used to set the fact base for the model, then assumptions were tested with real-world users and suppliers. We relied on public sources such as cancer incidence and mortality statistics from the World Health Organization and national cancer registries, along with reimbursement and coverage updates from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

To estimate testing volumes and adoption signals, we also reviewed US FDA approvals and safety communications for oncology diagnostics, plus peer-reviewed oncology and genomics journals for use-pattern shifts. Where possible, customs or trade statistics were used to track flows for instruments and reagents. Company filings, investor presentations, association websites, and reputable press sources were added for product mix and capacity commentary. A paid subscription for company financials, news, patent databases, and shipment-level trade data was used selectively to cross-check timelines and pricing direction. These desk sources are not exhaustive, and many additional references were used to collect, validate, and clarify specific data points during the study.

Primary Interviews and Surveys

Primary work focused on oncology labs, hospital decision makers, reference testing providers, and supporting ecosystem participants who see order volumes and test menus change over time. Interviews and short surveys were used to confirm what is counted as cancer-care genomics revenue, to pressure-test pricing and utilization assumptions, and to validate regional patterns across APAC, EMEA, and the Americas.

Distribution of primary research fieldwork respondents

Company type Respondent position Region
Top tier: 39% CXOs: 13% APAC: 40%
Mid tier: 47% Functional/Unit leaders: 43% EMEA: 33%
Smaller Players: 14% Managers: 44% Americas: 27%

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

Sizing starts with a top-down build where cancer incidence trends, guideline-driven testing uptake, and the share of patients routed into genomic testing are used to reconstruct an addressable testing pool by major region. Those demand pools are converted into revenues using practical price points for common test types and workflows, then adjusted for retesting frequency, liquid biopsy usage, and the split between in-house and outsourced testing.

After the first cut, totals are corroborated with selective bottom-up checks, such as sampled lab throughput discussions and channel checks on instruments and reagent pull-through, plus a sanity check on average revenue per test across care settings. Key inputs include reported oncology testing adoption shifts, reimbursement coverage direction, sequencing cost curves, and turnaround time expectations that influence test selection. Growth in targeted therapies that require companion biomarker evidence is also considered. Where bottom-up datapoints are limited, gaps are filled using conservative ranges tied to similar health systems, then narrowed during follow-up calls.

For forecasting, scenario analysis is used so uptake is not treated as a straight line when reimbursement, guideline updates, and technology mix can change quickly. Assumptions for test penetration, pricing progression, and care-setting mix were aligned with what interviewees expected to be realistic over the next few years, then applied consistently across regions.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Model outputs are checked against independent signals like cancer burden trends, published reimbursement policies, and observable instrument and consumable demand markers. Any large variances are investigated before sign-off. If a result appears off, the input drivers are revisited, unit assumptions are re-checked, and sources are re-contacted for clarification.

A multi-step review is applied so calculations, units, and currency handling are consistent across regions and years, and so the final results match what the data can support. Reports are refreshed annually, with interim updates when material events occur, such as major reimbursement shifts or step changes in test adoption. Before delivery, a fresh analyst pass is completed so clients receive the latest updated view.

Mordor Intelligence's Cancer Care Genomics Market Size Measured Against Other Published Estimates

Published market sizes for genomics in cancer care can differ widely even when they describe a similar theme, because the scope boundary and the revenue components included are not always aligned. Differences also come from how firms treat the mix of instruments, consumables, and services, and whether pricing and test penetration assumptions are refreshed with recent reimbursement and utilization signals.

The table shows a spread versus the 2026 value, and in Mordor Intelligence's model the market is counted around clinical and translational oncology use with instruments, consumables, and software-enabled services tied to patient-care workflows, rather than folding in broader genomics activity that sits outside cancer care delivery. Other gaps usually reflect differences in base year selection, use of a more aggressive adoption curve for liquid biopsy, or a faster ASP decline that is not validated through lab-level checks and recent policy updates.

Benchmark comparison

Source Market Size Gaps in Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence USD 28.44 B (2026)
Industry Publisher A USD 20.93 B (2024) Uses a different base year and forecast window, and the definition appears to emphasize genomics-driven cancer care revenue without making the same explicit separation between clinical workflow revenues and adjacent research-oriented genomics activity, which can shift what gets counted and when pricing is reset.
Industry Publisher B USD 20.56 B (2025) Includes instruments, consumables, and services, but the published snapshot relies on a nearer-term historic-to-forecast bridge that can understate later-year scale-up if test penetration and liquid biopsy adoption are not revalidated with current reimbursement coverage and care-setting utilization patterns.

Looking across the three figures, most of the difference is explained by year selection and what is treated as cancer-care genomics revenue versus broader genomics work. By keeping the model tied to observable care pathways, pricing logic, and adoption signals that can be rechecked each year, we can provide users a practical number that is easier to trace and replicate.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the genomics in cancer care market?

The market generated USD 28.44 billion in revenue in 2026 and is projected to grow to USD 59.78 billion by 2031.

Which region leads in market share?

North America contributed 36.60% of global revenue in 2025, buoyed by extensive reimbursement coverage and clear regulatory pathways.

Which product segment is expanding fastest?

Service-based offerings that bundle sequencing, analysis, and reporting are advancing at an 18.35% CAGR through 2031.

Why is single-molecule sequencing gaining traction?

Long-read platforms resolve structural variants and methylation patterns that standard NGS can miss, fueling a 22.85% CAGR in this technology segment.

How are liquid biopsies changing cancer management?

Circulating-tumor-DNA assays enable minimal-residual-disease monitoring, helping detect relapse up to two years earlier than imaging while supporting therapy adjustments in real time.

Page last updated on:

Genomics In Cancer Care Report Snapshots