Top 5 France Road Freight Transport Companies
CMA CGM Group (Including CEVA Logistics)
DACHSER
STEF Group
DSV A/S (Including DB Schenker)
GEODIS

Source: Mordor Intelligence
France Road Freight Transport Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key France Road Freight Transport players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can differ from revenue rankings because it weights what buyers feel every day, not just annual billings. Site density, service reliability, and proof of decarbonization readiness often matter more than global scale. In France road freight transport, capability signals that move decisions include depot proximity to ZFE zones, the ability to secure peak season capacity, documented emissions reporting, and repeatable cold chain compliance. Road freight prices in France often track diesel and toll movements, so contracts with clear indexation and surcharge governance are typically more resilient. Low Emission Zone rules and Crit'Air classes are now influencing fleet renewal, routing, and delivery windows in Paris and Lyon. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation because it translates those practical capabilities into comparable positions.
MI Competitive Matrix for France Road Freight Transport
The MI Matrix benchmarks top France Road Freight Transport Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of France Road Freight Transport Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
DSV A/S (Including DB Schenker)
Scale is being reset by the Schenker transaction, which materially expands European road orchestration. DSV, a leading vendor, can convert that breadth into denser French linehaul options, especially for groupage and cross-border consolidation. The acquisition closed in April 2025, moving the company from integration planning into execution. The upside case is a sharper ability to balance lanes during weak demand by pooling volumes across legacy networks. The downside case is service slippage during depot and system harmonization. Change fatigue among subcontractors and drivers is a key risk. Strength is purchasing power and network reach, while weakness is integration complexity that can distract local managers.
GEODIS
Network investment in le de France is directly tied to road-based distribution performance. GEODIS, a leading service provider, opened a 23,000 m hub at Brie-Comte-Robert in January 2025 with heavy truck docks and storage cells designed for regional coverage. That footprint matters when service promises rely on late cutoffs and short-distance shuttles to dense consumption zones. Faster enforcement of low emission restrictions that forces urgent fleet renewal and depot charging upgrades is a realistic what-if scenario. The key risk is that national acquisitions and site expansions dilute attention to on-time service during transition. Strength is national reach, while weakness is complexity across business lines.
STEF Group
Temperature controlled specialization gives it protection from some price-only bidding. STEF reported STEF France revenue of EUR 2,398 million for 2024 and noted that food consumption softness affected transport volumes while retail and foodservice lines improved. As a European leader in cold chain, the company can gain if frozen warehouse fill rates recover and buyers demand fewer stockouts, because reliability is valued more than base price. The downside case is continued volume weakness that leaves trucks underfilled on return legs. Energy price volatility hitting refrigeration costs is a critical risk. Strength is a unique cold network, while weakness is sensitivity to food demand cycles.
XPO, Inc.
Electric fleet scale is now a measurable capability rather than a pilot. XPO ordered 165 Renault Trucks electric vehicles for France and has positioned these trucks for suburban and regional missions that replace diesel units over time. XPO, a leading provider of pallet distribution, can convert that into access certainty where low emission rules tighten and customers ask for audited reductions. The upside case is faster adoption of electric delivery windows in dense cities, which could lock in multi-year contracts. Charging downtime and depot power limits that reduce daily utilization are the key risk. Strength is execution at scale with clear decarbonization steps, while weakness is high capital intensity during a still-evolving cost curve.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which capabilities matter most when choosing a road freight provider in France?
Look for depot coverage near your pickup points, stable peak season capacity, and clear fuel and toll indexation terms. Ask for on time performance by lane and documented claims ratios.
How should I evaluate low emission access readiness for city deliveries?
Start with the fleet plan by vehicle class and the provider's ability to schedule compliant tractors for restricted zones. Also confirm how they handle exceptions, permits, and replacement capacity during enforcement days.
What questions help separate temperature controlled specialists from general carriers?
Ask about validated temperature monitoring, documented corrective actions, and how they manage multi temperature routes. Also verify maintenance routines for refrigeration units and contingency planning for breakdowns.
What is the most practical way to compare FTL versus LTL options in France?
FTL usually optimizes speed and damage risk when volumes are steady, while LTL reduces cost when shipments are smaller and frequent. Compare total lead time variability and the provider's hub handling discipline.
How can a shipper reduce disruption risk from driver shortages?
Use lanes with backup capacity commitments and require named escalation paths for missed pickups. Also consider combining predictable volumes into fixed schedules to reduce day to day dispatch stress.
What decarbonization steps are realistic for 2025 to 2027 road freight plans?
Most near term progress comes from route optimization, low carbon fuels, and targeted electric deployments on short haul lanes. Build a lane by lane roadmap with measurable emissions reporting rather than broad pledges.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Data Sourcing: Public company filings, annual results, and press rooms were used first, then named business media. Private firm signals used site openings, fleet actions, certifications, and contract disclosures. Indicators were limited to France road freight execution wherever possible. When direct figures were missing, multiple observable signals were triangulated to avoid overstatement.
Depots, cross docks, and French lane coverage determine pickup cutoffs and delivery lead times.
Recognized names reduce tender risk in regulated zones and food safety sensitive transport.
Higher France road volumes improve lane balance and pricing stability during demand swings.
Fleet access, subcontractor depth, and hub throughput drive on time performance in France corridors.
Electric trucks, low carbon fuels, and digital proof of delivery improve access and compliance in French cities.
Strong results fund fleet renewal, wage pressure absorption, and network investments in France.
