Top 5 Europe Aircraft MRO Companies
Lufthansa Technik AG
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
SR Technics Switzerland Ltd.
Air France Industries KLM Engineering & Maintenance (AIR FRANCE-KLM)
Airbus SE

Source: Mordor Intelligence
Europe Aircraft MRO Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Europe Aircraft MRO players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can diverge from a simple revenue based ranking because it weights what buyers experience on the ground. Presence and reliability can matter more than scale when aircraft are grounded waiting for engine slots or certified parts. Reuters reporting from Europe highlights how durability tradeoffs and long repair queues can drive real operational pressure for airlines. Part-IS dates also create a hard compliance clock that can reshuffle vendor shortlists even when pricing looks similar. Engine turnaround time discipline, in region footprint, and asset utilization rates are practical indicators that shape outcomes. Another indicator is whether a provider is expanding test cells, hangars, or approved repair scope in 2024 and 2025. Operators also want clarity on when Part-IS applies, which starts October 16, 2025 for certain organizations and later for others, because it impacts audits and onboarding. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it converts these capability signals into consistent scoring.
MI Competitive Matrix for Europe Aircraft MRO
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Europe Aircraft MRO Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Europe Aircraft MRO Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Lufthansa Technik AG
Contract momentum keeps utilization high across several European sites, even while parts shortages stretch shop queues. Lufthansa Technik is a major player in aircraft maintenance services and reported EUR 7,441 million revenue in its 2024 MRO segment and highlighted record Adjusted EBIT of EUR 635 million, which signals disciplined pricing and cost control. EASA Part-IS timelines raise near term IT and audit effort, so a weak cyber program could become a visible customer risk by October 16, 2025. If engine material flow normalizes faster than expected, its Portugal component repair investment could expand throughput and soften turnaround volatility.
Airbus SE
Services growth is becoming a stronger lever, and it changes how operators view OEM support during heavy checks and modifications. Airbus, a top manufacturer by buyer recognition, told Reuters in October 2025 that aircraft services are rising and that services contributed about 10% of core revenue in 2024. That direction supports predictive maintenance adoption and tighter configuration control, which can reduce repeat findings during base maintenance. Part-IS compliance will likely push Airbus customers to demand clearer system boundaries between aircraft data flows and shop floor networks by October 2025. If supply chain recovery continues, Airbus linked upgrade packages could capture more midlife modification work, though execution risk rises when engineering changes collide with limited hangar slots.
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
Shop visit availability is now a strategic differentiator, not a back office topic, as widebody flying hours and overhaul demand rise. Rolls-Royce, a leading company in large engine services, raised its 2025 outlook after strong first half performance, citing improvements in engine durability and maintenance profitability. It also committed in 2024 to invest GBP 55 million across Derby and Dahlewitz to expand assembly, test, and shop visit capacity, with more than 300 roles planned. Improved time on wing could reduce unscheduled removals, which would free capacity for planned events. The operational downside is that any parts constraint can still stretch turnaround and push airlines toward expensive spare engine leasing.
Safran
Network expansion is the central story, and it is tied to concrete footprint commitments rather than broad promises. Safran, a major supplier to European narrowbody fleets, said in October 2024 it would invest over EUR 1 billion to scale its global MRO network for LEAP engines, including a Brussels site that came on stream in early 2024 and planned expansion in France. For European operators, that expansion can lower ferry costs and reduce total downtime once shop visit volume climbs toward the stated 1,200 per year by 2028. Part-IS adds a new layer of control for engine data and test cell systems by October 2025, so Safran's ability to standardize controls across sites becomes a moat. The key risk is recruiting skilled labor fast enough without damaging quality.
Air France Industries KLM Engineering & Maintenance (AIR FRANCE-KLM)
Sustainability moves are now operational decisions, not only marketing language, because engine testing has measurable fuel use and emissions. AFI KLM E&M, a leading service provider in Europe, said it would use sustainable aviation fuel for 10% of engine test operations at Paris CDG and Amsterdam Schiphol starting in July 2025, covering about 300 engine test runs each year. It also announced in June 2025 plans for a LEAP engine leasing joint venture concept with AerCap to support customers during shop visits, which targets aircraft availability pain points. Part-IS becomes a near term execution hurdle for connected analytics platforms and customer portals by October 2025. If supply chain bottlenecks persist, the threat is longer turnaround and higher working capital tied up in rotable pools.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should an airline check first when selecting a European MRO provider for heavy checks?
Check slot availability for the next 618 months and the provider's record for on time redelivery. Confirm staffing depth for your aircraft type and your planned check package.
How can a carrier reduce disruption from engine shop visit delays in Europe?
Lock in slots early and secure spare engine access through leasing or pooling where possible. Validate parts planning and repair scope assumptions before induction to avoid mid visit delays.
What is the most practical way to compare engine overhaul providers across Europe?
Compare typical turnaround time ranges, test cell availability, and approved repair scope for your engine build standard. Ask for recent examples of similar work packages completed since 2023.
How will EASA Part-IS change day to day work for maintenance organizations?
It will require a formal information security management system with incident detection and response processes. Expect deeper audits of connected tooling, data flows, and third party IT dependencies.
When does sustainability actually affect aircraft maintenance decisions in Europe?
It matters when painting, cleaning, and engine testing choices change emissions or fuel use during maintenance events. Buyers increasingly ask for measurable actions, not only policy statements.
What contract terms matter most in a period of parts shortages?
Define who carries parts risk and what happens when parts are unavailable. Include clear escalation paths, minimum kit completeness targets, and transparent billing rules for additional findings.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Data sourcing prioritizes company annual reports, investor materials, and official press rooms. Regulatory facts come from EASA and public EU sources when relevant. For private firms, observable signals such as facility additions, certifications, and named contracts are used. When a single metric is unavailable, multiple in scope indicators are triangulated.
Hangars, engine shops, and line stations across Europe reduce ferry time and improve slot access.
Airline and defense buyers favor names that pass audits repeatedly and are trusted for release to service quality.
Higher Europe delivered volume usually means better pooling power, tooling depth, and priority access to parts.
In Europe, the limiting factor is bays, test cells, and licensed staff aligned to EASA approvals.
Predictive tools, new repair methods, and upgrade packages since 2023 reduce repeat findings and cut downtime.
Stable service economics support inventory buffers, hiring, and overtime without eroding quality.
