Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Size and Share

Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The dynamic application security testing market size is projected to be USD 3.61 billion in 2025, USD 4.18 billion in 2026, and reach USD 8.63 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 15.59% from 2026 to 2031. Escalating API-centric attack volumes, regulatory mandates that insist on runtime validation, and rapidly falling exploit-creation costs together accelerate demand for dynamic testing that can exercise live applications instead of reviewing static code. Vendors are embedding artificial-intelligence engines that generate boundary-condition test cases, while buyers increasingly favor platforms that integrate with continuous integration pipelines so that every build triggers a scan. Cloud-native delivery dominates because scanners must follow containerized workloads that redeploy dozens of times per day. Competitive pressure pivots on false-positive reduction, proven API coverage, and support for modern protocols such as GraphQL and gRPC, all of which influence procurement decisions for large enterprises and small businesses alike. 

Key Report Takeaways

  • By component, solutions held a 68.30% share of the dynamic application security testing market in 2025, whereas services are advancing at a 15.62% CAGR through 2031. 
  • By deployment mode, cloud-based platforms accounted for 73.50% of the dynamic application security testing market size in 2025 and are projected to expand at a 15.76% CAGR through 2031. 
  • By organization size, large enterprises captured 59.20% of the dynamic application security testing market share in 2025, while small and medium enterprises are growing at a 16.99% CAGR. 
  • By end-user vertical, BFSI commanded 24.20% of 2025 revenue, yet retail and e-commerce is the fastest riser at an 18.65% CAGR to 2031. 
  • By geography, North America led with 42.80% share in 2025, whereas Asia-Pacific is forecast to grow at a 17.10% CAGR, the highest regional pace.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Component: Services Scale Faster Than Software

Solutions generated 68.30% of 2025 revenue, showing that enterprises still license full-featured platforms to cover broad asset inventories. Yet the services slice is growing at 15.62% CAGR, faster than the overall dynamic application security testing market. Providers integrate scanners with CI/CD systems, tune authentication flows, and interpret findings for business units. Global consultancies, including Accenture, expanded application-security headcount through 2025 to meet this demand. 

Services also appeal to organizations that struggle with false positives; a managed team validates exploitability before escalating, trimming alert queues. As a result, the dynamic application security testing market size attached to services is projected to expand steadily through 2031. Vendors respond by bundling onboarding, custom policy creation, and regular health checks inside subscription tiers, aligning economic incentives with customer outcomes.

Dynamic Application Security Testing Market: Market Share by Component
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

By Deployment Mode: Cloud-Based Delivery Dominates

In 2025, spending on cloud-hosted scanners accounted for 73.50%, and they continue to outpace on-premise solutions, growing at a rate of 15.76% CAGR. Cloud engines possess the capability to discover and test containerized microservices and serverless functions, which are redeployed dozens of times daily, in near real-time. This ability to handle frequent redeployments efficiently is a key factor driving the adoption of cloud-hosted solutions. The extension of Amazon Inspector to Lambda and container workloads further highlights the growing preference of buyers for fully managed offerings, as these solutions reduce operational overhead and enhance scalability.

In industries with stringent regulations, on-premise deployment remains a critical requirement due to data sovereignty policies that limit external processing. These policies ensure sensitive data remains within controlled environments, making on-premise solutions indispensable for compliance. As a result, hybrid architectures are emerging as a practical solution: the scan engine operates in the vendor's cloud, but credentials and other sensitive data are securely stored on the customer's hardware. This setup ensures compliance requirements are met without compromising the breadth of security coverage. Such a mixed model underscores the adaptability and flexibility required in the dynamic application security testing market, enabling it to cater to both cloud-centric developers seeking innovation and risk-averse incumbents prioritizing regulatory compliance and data security.

By Organization Size: SMEs Narrow the Adoption Gap

In 2025, large enterprises commanded a dominant 59.20% share of the revenue, driven by their expansive application portfolios and stringent audit mandates. These organizations manage extensive application estates, which require robust security measures to comply with regulatory standards and ensure operational efficiency. In contrast, SMEs are rapidly gaining ground, boasting a robust 16.99% CAGR, thanks to the shift from hefty upfront licenses to usage-based pricing models. This pricing approach significantly reduces the financial burden on smaller organizations, enabling them to adopt advanced security solutions. A case in point is StackHawk, which offers a free tier for open-source projects and charges per-scan for commercial workloads, catering to budget-conscious teams and fostering wider adoption among SMEs.

While SMEs grapple with expertise limitations, managed dynamic scanning services have emerged as a practical and cost-effective solution. These services address the skill gaps in smaller organizations by providing specialized expertise and continuous monitoring. Indian outsourcing firms, leveraging regional security operation centers, provide continuous testing services at competitive rates, bolstering their foothold in emerging markets. These firms enable SMEs to access high-quality security testing without the need for significant in-house resources. As a result, SMEs' share in the dynamic application security testing market is poised for a steady ascent in the coming years, driven by increasing adoption of managed services and the growing need for robust security measures in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Dynamic Application Security Testing Market: Market Share by Organization Size
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

By End-User Vertical: Retail and E-Commerce Accelerate Post-Breach

Thanks to its open-banking exposure and hefty regulatory fines, the BFSI sector held a commanding 24.20% share of the 2025 market value. This dominance highlights the sector's critical role in driving the adoption of advanced security measures. Yet, in the wake of the Ticketmaster and Santander breaches, which compromised 560 million records, retail and e-commerce expenditures have been on a robust ascent, boasting an 18.65% CAGR. These incidents have underscored the vulnerabilities in data security, prompting businesses to prioritize investments in protective measures. With PCI DSS 4.0 now mandating continuous runtime validation for systems handling cardholder data, the necessity for dynamic testing has never been clearer. This regulatory shift emphasizes the importance of proactive security strategies to mitigate risks and ensure compliance. 

Guided by FDA device-security directives, the healthcare sector is ramping up its security measures to address emerging threats. The sector's increasing reliance on connected devices has made robust security protocols indispensable. Simultaneously, the energy, utilities, and manufacturing sectors are turning to dynamic testing to fortify their industrial IoT interfaces. These industries face unique challenges due to the critical nature of their operations, making the adoption of advanced security solutions a priority. The pattern is consistent across all sectors: the combination of live, externally-facing APIs and the potential for financial and reputational harm fuels ongoing investments in the dynamic application security testing market. This sustained investment reflects the growing awareness of the need for comprehensive security frameworks to protect sensitive data and maintain operational integrity.

Geography Analysis

North America led with 42.80% of 2025 revenue because Executive Order 14028 forces federal contractors to demonstrate runtime vulnerability validation. Adoption depth is highest, but teams also experience the greatest alert fatigue, spurring premium demand for proof-based scanning and AI triage. Canada’s Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act, enacted in 2024, widened mandatory testing to provincially regulated utilities, adding incremental demand. 

Europe contributed roughly 29% of spending in 2025, propelled by the progressive rollout of NIS2, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act. German and French financial institutions extend scans to every third-party API, aligning with 24-hour incident-report deadlines. Post-Brexit divergence obliges United Kingdom firms that serve EU clients to follow both regulation sets, inflating test volume and complexity. 

Asia-Pacific is the fastest growing region at a 17.10% CAGR. China’s Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 now mandates dynamic assessments for Level 3 systems or higher, covering most enterprise applications. India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act enforces fines up to INR 2.5 billion (USD 30 million) for breaches, encouraging exporters to certify security posture to global customers. Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand together make sizeable contributions where breach-notification laws tighten annually.

Dynamic Application Security Testing Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Regulatory Landscape

In the United States, Executive Order 14028 (May 2021) anchors federal software supply chain requirements and pushes agencies and vendors toward documented secure development and test practices that demonstrate exploitable risk in running applications. NIST guidance, including the Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF, SP 800-218) and supply chain security integration in DevSecOps pipelines (SP 800-204D), reinforces routine vulnerability identification and response as part of CI/CD workflows, supporting automated dynamic testing alongside other AppSec controls.

In Europe, the Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847) entered into force on 10 December 2024 and formalizes security by design obligations across the product lifecycle, with a stronger emphasis on continuous verification rather than point-in-time assessment. The Act also introduces reporting duties for actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents starting 11 September 2026, adding urgency for manufacturers and software producers to operationalize runtime validation and evidence capture through tooling such as DAST within broader secure development and vulnerability handling programs.

Competitive Landscape

The dynamic application security testing market remains moderately fragmented; the top ten suppliers control about 45-50% of revenue. Incumbents such as Invicti Security, PortSwigger, and Qualys compete on breadth, layering API, compliance, and proof-based engines into unified dashboards. New entrants, including Bright Security and Probely, focus on developer experience by integrating directly with GitLab or GitHub workflows. 

AI-assisted triage and test-case generation dominate patent filings, underscoring vendor recognition that false-positive fatigue jeopardizes renewals more than raw detection rates. Invicti’s acquisition of API Fortress in January 2026 signals consolidation aimed at protocol depth, while PortSwigger’s automated multi-factor authentication handling released in December 2025 exemplifies niche capability leap-frogging. 

White-space persists in business-logic flaw detection and in reliably scanning protocols such as GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket. Providers that blend generative AI with behavioral instrumentation to close these gaps are positioned to capture future share as the dynamic application security testing market matures.

Dynamic Application Security Testing Industry Leaders

  1. IBM Corporation

  2. Synopsys Inc.

  3. Veracode Inc.

  4. Checkmarx Ltd.

  5. OpenText Corporation (Fortify)

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

Vendor consolidation and platform convergence are creating whitespace for unified workflows that connect runtime findings to developer facing remediation, which directly addresses false-positive fatigue and fragmented toolchains. Buyers are standardizing on broader application security platforms that embed DAST alongside posture management and policy orchestration, as reflected in Invicti expanding beyond scanning through its Kondukto acquisition (August 2025) and continuing to emphasize proof-based validation across portfolio integrations. This shift improves the case for providers that can connect DAST outputs to consistent governance artifacts for audit readiness across SBOM, secure development frameworks, and vulnerability reporting processes.

API-centric runtime testing is also a clear opportunity as modern applications expose large endpoint inventories and widen protocol diversity (GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket), which raises demand for deeper authenticated coverage in CI/CD and ephemeral environments. Radware acquiring Pynt (January 2026) to strengthen full lifecycle API security and Snyk launching Snyk API and Web (April 2025) to productize DAST within its platform signal continued investment in API focused scanning and integrated developer experience. At the same time, enterprise roadmaps are incorporating AI oriented application behaviors and agentic workflows, increasing the value of DAST offerings that can validate runtime misuse paths, test case generation, and policy controls in production-like conditions without adding operational overhead.

Recent Industry Developments

  • July 2026: OpenText announced Fortify Agentic Analyzer as a multi-agent, multi-phase analysis capability across the Fortify portfolio, available for Fortify on Demand, on-premises, and private cloud deployments. The release expands AI-assisted analysis within AppSec suites and supports enterprise rollouts by aligning with existing Fortify licensing and deployment preferences.
  • June 2026: Veracode rolled out DAST platform enhancements, including directory restriction controls and improved scheduling, plus ISM endpoint updates. The updates strengthen governance for large-scale scanning programs and tighten control of scan scope in CI/CD and enterprise environments.
  • December 2025: PortSwigger released Burp Suite Enterprise 2025.4 with automated multi-factor authentication workflow handling. This capability reduces friction for authenticated scanning at scale and advances coverage for apps protected by modern identity controls.

Table of Contents for Dynamic Application Security Testing Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Shift-left DevSecOps Adoption
    • 4.2.2 Rising Volume of API-Centric Attacks
    • 4.2.3 AI-Enabled Exploit Automation
    • 4.2.4 Mandatory SBOM and Supply-Chain Disclosure Rules
    • 4.2.5 Pay-per-Scan Pricing Disrupting TCO
    • 4.2.6 Low-Code/No-Code Proliferation
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Signal-to-Noise (False-Positive) Fatigue
    • 4.3.2 Limited Runtime and Business-Logic Coverage
    • 4.3.3 Scarcity of AppSec Skill-Sets
    • 4.3.4 Fragmented Standards across Jurisdictions
  • 4.4 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Component
    • 5.1.1 Solutions
    • 5.1.2 Services
  • 5.2 By Deployment Mode
    • 5.2.1 Cloud-Based
    • 5.2.2 On-Premise
  • 5.3 By Organisation Size
    • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
    • 5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
  • 5.4 By End-User Vertical
    • 5.4.1 BFSI
    • 5.4.2 Healthcare
    • 5.4.3 IT and Telecom
    • 5.4.4 Industrial and Defence
    • 5.4.5 Retail and E-Commerce
    • 5.4.6 Energy and Utilities
    • 5.4.7 Manufacturing
    • 5.4.8 Other End-User Vertical
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Asia Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.4 India
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 New Zealand
    • 5.5.4.7 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1.1 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.1.3 Turkey
    • 5.5.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
    • 5.5.5.2.3 Kenya
    • 5.5.5.2.4 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 IBM Corporation
    • 6.4.2 Synopsys Inc.
    • 6.4.3 Veracode Inc.
    • 6.4.4 Checkmarx Ltd.
    • 6.4.5 OpenText Corporation (Fortify)
    • 6.4.6 Rapid7 Inc.
    • 6.4.7 Qualys Inc.
    • 6.4.8 Invicti Security Ltd.
    • 6.4.9 Contrast Security Inc.
    • 6.4.10 HCLTech Ltd. (AppScan)
    • 6.4.11 GitLab Inc.
    • 6.4.12 Snyk Ltd.
    • 6.4.13 Tenable Holdings Inc.
    • 6.4.14 PortSwigger Ltd. (Burp Suite)
    • 6.4.15 Indusface Pvt Ltd.
    • 6.4.16 NowSecure Inc.
    • 6.4.17 Appknox Pte Ltd.
    • 6.4.18 CyCognito Inc.
    • 6.4.19 WhiteHat Security Inc. (NTT)
    • 6.4.20 Cobalt Labs Inc.

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definition and Coverage

This market covers revenue earned from dynamic application security testing (DAST) tools and related services that test running applications from the outside, across web apps, mobile apps, and exposed APIs. It includes commercial solutions plus implementation, support, and managed testing services across major industry users and regions.

Scope exclusions: We exclude pure static code testing, software composition analysis, general penetration testing that is not delivered as a DAST product or service, and endpoint or network security tools.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Component
    • Solutions
    • Services
  • By Deployment Mode
    • Cloud-Based
    • On-Premise
  • By Organisation Size
    • Large Enterprises
    • Small and Medium Enterprises
  • By End-User Vertical
    • BFSI
    • Healthcare
    • IT and Telecom
    • Industrial and Defence
    • Retail and E-Commerce
    • Energy and Utilities
    • Manufacturing
    • Other End-User Vertical
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • India
      • Australia
      • New Zealand
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Saudi Arabia
        • Turkey
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Nigeria
        • Kenya
        • Rest of Africa

Data Sources, Market Sizing, and Validation

Desk Research

Desk research was used to set the market boundaries, build the first demand map, and identify the main adoption signals that influence DAST spend. We referenced public sources such as NIST guidance, CISA advisories, MITRE CWE lists, OWASP Top 10 and API Security Top 10, and breach statistics published by agencies and major regulators to understand how runtime testing is being prioritized.

To translate that context into sizing inputs, we also used company annual reports, security product brochures, and investor presentations to frame product scope and typical packaging (tool licenses, subscriptions, and service bundles). Analysts also used paid subscriptions for company financials and news, plus patent databases to track where scanning and automation features are trending. The sources listed here are illustrative, and additional public and private references were used for data collection, validation, and clarification.

Primary Interviews and Surveys

Primary work centered on interviews and structured surveys with application security leaders, DevSecOps owners, security testing managers, and service providers who run scans for clients. We used these conversations to confirm what buyers actually count as DAST, how usage shifts with CI pipelines, and what pricing is paid when testing expands from web apps into API surfaces.

Distribution of primary research fieldwork respondents

Company typeRespondent positionRegion
Top tier: 39% CXOs: 14%APAC: 46%
Mid tier: 46% Functional/Unit leaders: 33%EMEA: 32%
Smaller Players: 15% Managers: 53%Americas: 22%

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

Sizing started with a top-down build where application security and security testing spend pools were reconstructed by region, then filtered using DAST adoption and budget-share splits validated by interviews. To make the totals practical, we corroborated results with selective bottom-up checks using sampled price points and typical seat, application, or scan-volume based packaging, followed by channel checks on how often services are bundled with tools.

Key inputs in the model included, as examples, growth in API exposure and related vulnerability patterns, the shift to cloud-based deployment for testing tools, CI or DevSecOps pipeline rollout intensity, regulated-industry compliance pressure, and the mix of enterprise size because buyer maturity affects the service-to-software split. Where vendor revenue disclosure is incomplete, gaps were handled using peer-based ranges and cross-checking against deployment footprints and customer counts discussed in primary calls. Forecasts were prepared using scenario analysis tied to a small set of driver variables, then adjusted using expert consensus on pricing progression and service attach rates.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Validation was done through repeated cross-checks between model outputs and independent signals, such as reported security testing budgets, public vulnerability trends, and regional cloud adoption indicators. When a data point created an unusual jump in a country, vertical, or deployment split, we revisited the assumption and re-contacted respondents to confirm whether the shift was real or timing-related.

Before sign-off, a second analyst reviews calculations, unit logic, and currency conversions, and then the full dataset is checked for variance against adjacent markets in application security. Reports are refreshed annually, and interim updates are made when major events materially change demand drivers. Right before delivery, a final review pass is completed so clients receive the latest updated view.

Mordor Intelligence's Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Size Versus Other Published Estimates

Published market sizes for DAST often vary because the product boundary is not interpreted the same way, and the pricing unit can differ across buyers. Some studies lean more on vendor messaging, while others start from IT security spend pools, which then pushes totals apart.

Pure penetration testing projects and general red-team services are a common add-in, and those can inflate the DAST number even when the work is not tied to a DAST platform subscription. Those add-ons sit outside Mordor Intelligence's scope, which keeps the model tied to DAST tools and the related services that directly support runtime scanning of applications and APIs, and the estimate is then checked against deployment patterns, service attach rates, and region-level adoption signals.

Benchmark comparison

SourceMarket SizeGaps in Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence USD 4.18 B (2026)
Trade Journal A USD 2.56 B (2023)Uses an earlier base year and a shorter forecast window, and the scope description is high level, so cloud versus on-prem mix and services attach assumptions may not be fully normalized across regions.
Regional Consultancy B USD 1.80 B (2024)Starts from a narrower spend pool and may treat enterprise usage in large regulated verticals as partial adoption, which can undercount bundled services and higher utilization in mature DevSecOps programs.

The spread across published values is mainly explained by what gets counted as DAST versus adjacent security services, plus differences in base year timing and how pricing is scaled as scanning expands to APIs. By keeping the inputs tied to adoption, packaging, and attach-rate checks that can be repeated each year, the resulting market size stays easier to trace back to clear demand drivers.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How fast is spending on dynamic application security testing expected to grow through 2031?

Industry revenue is projected to climb at a 15.59% CAGR between 2026 and 2031, rising from USD 4.18 billion in 2026 to USD 8.63 billion by 2031.

Which deployment approach attracts the most investment today?

Cloud-based scanners already account for 73.50% of 2025 spending because they can track containerized and serverless endpoints that redeploy frequently.

Why are retailers ramping up dynamic testing budgets?

Breaches that exposed 560 million records in 2024 highlighted API authentication gaps, prompting retail and e-commerce firms to boost outlays at an 18.65% CAGR.

What creates the biggest hurdle to wider adoption inside small companies?

A shortage of application-security expertise and historically high license costs slow uptake, though usage-based pricing and managed-service options are closing the gap.

Page last updated on:

Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Report Snapshots