What should airlines look for when selecting a landing gear overhaul provider?

Check repair station approvals, part traceability, and typical turnaround times for your aircraft types. Confirm in-house special processes and access to OEM technical data.

How do I compare wheel and brake offerings across suppliers?

Focus on landings per overhaul, heat tolerance, and tire change time improvements. Ask for operator references on durability and shop visit frequency.

Why do landing gear lead times spike during fleet ramp-ups?

Forgings, heat treat capacity, and certified surface processes can become bottlenecks. Small shortages can cascade because landing gear parts are safety critical and hard to substitute.

What are practical signs a supplier can support both OEM delivery and aftermarket needs?

Look for evidence of multi-year service agreements, multiple overhaul sites, and spares pooling capability. Consistent AOG responsiveness is often the best signal.

How are environmental rules affecting landing gear repair costs?

Rules restricting certain chrome related processes can force process changes and re-qualification. That can raise cost and extend turnaround until alternatives are fully approved.

What technology trends matter most for landing gear through 2030?

Expect more health monitoring, more electric elements in braking and actuation, and wider use of lightweight materials. The winners will shorten overhaul cycles without adding certification risk.

Top Commercial Aircraft Landing Gear Companies

Safran SA

Production stability now hinges on landing gear capacity and fast turnaround in overhaul shops, not only new shipsets. Safran Landing Systems, a leading player, renewed a wheels and carbon brake supply and MRO agreement with Spirit Airlines in April 2025, which anchors recurring aftermarket demand on the A320 family. Safran also signed a long-term deal in November 2025 to supply wheels and electric carbon brakes for Riyadh Air's Boeing 787-9 fleet, which signals confidence in electric braking scale-up. If chromium related finishing rules tighten further, the main risk is bottlenecks in qualified surface processes and repair approvals.

Leaders

Collins Aerospace (RTX Corporation)

Airline dispatch reliability often improves when landing gear controls, brakes, and spares are treated as one service package. Collins Aerospace, a major supplier, describes fully integrated ATA 32 offerings that include braking, steering control, and extension and retraction equipment for commercial platforms. The company's wide installed base makes it hard for smaller firms to match documentation depth and field support. One realistic upside would be more licensed regional repair capacity that reduces ferry time and shop congestion. Any prolonged shortage of forged parts or heat treat slots for critical landing gear hardware is an obvious operational risk.

Leaders

Liebherr Group

Aftermarket induction slots are becoming a strategic asset as fleets age into heavy overhaul cycles. Liebherr, a top manufacturer, signed a landing gear overhaul agreement with SkyWest Airlines in March 2025 for Embraer 175-E1 aircraft, with contracted slots running through 2032. That contract suggests Liebherr can convert technical capability into long-horizon shop loading in North America. If airworthiness directives expand inspection scope, customer value rises for providers with strong process control and repair engineering. The main downside is execution risk if overhaul demand spikes faster than tooling and staffing can scale.

Leaders

Hroux-Devtek Inc.

Ownership changes can unlock faster capital decisions for landing gear tooling and repair expansion. Hroux-Devtek, a major OEM, entered a definitive agreement in July 2024 to be acquired by Platinum Equity at about USD 1.35 billion enterprise value, then closed in February 2025. If the new owner accelerates investment in engineering and repair capacity, Hroux-Devtek could win more retrofit and overhaul packages tied to fleet life extension. A downside scenario is disruption in customer approvals during integration, especially for fracture critical parts with tight traceability. Regulatory pressure on chrome plating and hazardous processes remains a real cost and lead time driver for this company's repair loops.

Leaders

Eaton Corporation plc

Backlog strength can be as important as revenue when buyers are planning landing gear overhaul and spares availability. Eaton, a key supplier, reported record Aerospace segment sales of USD 971 million in fourth quarter 2024 and noted Aerospace backlog growth, which supports continued investment in aerospace hydraulics and related subsystems. Eaton also positions its aerospace hydraulics portfolio as supporting utility subsystems that include aircraft hydraulic power generation and distribution, which often ties into landing gear actuation power paths. If more electric architectures reduce hydraulic content per aircraft, the upside is higher value electrohydraulic components and smarter fluid management. The main risk is qualification timing for redesigns on safety-critical systems.

Leaders

Triumph Group, Inc.

Portfolio reshaping often changes how landing gear work is pursued, even when technical capability remains. Triumph agreed in December 2023 to sell its Product Support business to AAR for USD 725 million, which included wheels and brakes repair activities that touch landing gear availability. Triumph, a well known platform supplier, later agreed in February 2025 to be acquired by Warburg Pincus and Berkshire Partners, which can reduce short term reporting pressure. The what-if upside is deeper focus on high value actuation and spares where certification barriers are high. The main risk is that divestitures create gaps in shop footprint, which can weaken turnaround commitments during peak demand.

Established

GKN Aerospace (GKN plc)

Legacy engineering depth still matters when landing gear designs move toward lighter structures and more repairable interfaces. GKN describes GKN Fokker as having expertise that includes landing gear, alongside wiring and aerostructures, which supports its relevance on landing gear structure-adjacent work. The company's likely advantage is mature manufacturing discipline and a long record with complex aircraft primes, which can help during certification and configuration control. If composite adoption accelerates inside landing gear doors and adjacent structures, GKN can benefit from its material capability base. The main risk is that landing gear dedicated competitors may capture the highest margin shipset work and limit GKN to narrower work packages.

Established

Honeywell International Inc.

Service economics improve when a braking system lasts longer and yields cleaner condition data for planning. Honeywell, a major brand, highlights wheels and braking systems and states its wheels and brakes technologies average 5.5 million aircraft landings a year, which points to broad operational exposure. Honeywell also reported that its Aerospace Technologies segment saw strong commercial aftermarket performance in its full year 2024 results, which supports ongoing service investment. If airlines push harder on total cost per landing, the upside is more adoption of high wear-life brake materials and digitally enabled support. The key risk is slower adoption if operators defer wheel and brake retrofits during cash conservation cycles.

Established

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Cash generation can stay strong even when buyers push back on unit pricing for aircraft systems. Parker reported strong aerospace systems demand in 2024, helped by sustained OEM and aftermarket activity, which supports investment headroom for landing gear adjacent actuation and hydraulics. The differentiation is broad actuation know-how, including fly-by-wire actuator architectures used on commercial transports and regional jets. If airlines accelerate outsourcing, Parker's opportunity is to bundle repairable actuation content into predictable service programs. The key risk is that landing gear focused specialists capture the highest urgency work when AOG events drive purchasing.

Performers

Crane Aerospace & Electronics (Crane Company)

Component selection wins can compound when they include both sensing and control on the same aircraft. Crane Aerospace and Electronics, a key participant, was selected in August 2024 to supply a proximity sensing system for Deutsche Aircraft's D328eco, following an earlier selection for the brake control system on the same program. That pairing supports a strong position in landing gear health signals and brake command integrity. If regulators tighten inspection and reporting expectations, proximity and brake control data can become a differentiator for operators. The risk is program timing, since new aircraft entries into service can slip and delay volume.

Performers

Moog Inc.

Aftermarket demand tends to surface first in repair activity and spares provisioning, then flow back into new production planning. Moog reported in first quarter 2025 that Commercial Aircraft sales increased 14% year over year, citing repair activity and initial provisioning of spares. Its differentiation is motion control depth, which can translate into landing gear steering and actuation elements when programs move toward electrification. One realistic what-if scenario is that airlines adopt more performance based spares pooling, which increases demand for predictable repair turn times. A critical risk is supply chain fragility in high precision components that sit inside actuators.

Performers

Sumitomo Precision Products Co., Ltd.

Regional support partnerships can matter more than global scale for many landing gear buyers. Sumitomo Precision Products was named in AAR's April 2024 release extending and expanding distribution for V2500 starter components, which highlights its long-running aerospace equipment role that includes landing gear content. Its differentiation is steady, safety-critical manufacturing culture and long program lifetimes, which tends to fit regional jets and mature platforms. If airlines consolidate repair networks, Sumitomo can benefit by offering predictable spares and overhaul inputs via partners. The key risk is limited overseas overhaul capacity compared with larger system integrators.

Aspirants

CIRCOR International, Inc.

Single subsystem wins can be meaningful when they unlock deeper landing gear integration over time. CIRCOR Aerospace announced in August 2025 a contract from Safran Landing Systems for an emergency extension pneumatic module tied to a landing gear deployment function. The company also completed its acquisition by KKR in October 2023, which can support investment in specialized manufacturing and qualification. The upside scenario is that safety-critical modules expand into more platforms once reliability data accumulates. The main risk is dependence on a few primes for demand, which can amplify forecast swings and supplier quality audits.

Aspirants

Magellan Aerospace Corporation

Precision machining credibility is built through repeatable kitting and defect prevention, not marketing claims. Magellan presents landing gear kit preparation as part of its kitting capability, including high part count kits staged for point-of-use delivery. That positioning fits buyers trying to reduce line stoppages and reconcile variable forging lead times. If build rates rise on high volume narrowbodies, Magellan's upside is higher throughput in kit assembly and buffer kit services. A persistent risk is exposure to schedule volatility at major airframers, which can create sudden working capital pressure. Magellan also reported quarterly revenue updates in 2024 that indicate continued operating scale.

Aspirants

REVIMA Group

Overhaul slot scarcity is pushing airlines toward longer contracts and deeper technical support terms. REVIMA, a leading service provider, opened a large landing gear overhaul facility in Thailand in January 2023, which it positioned as a regional hub. REVIMA also extended landing gear repair capability at its Yainville site in October 2023 after airworthiness authority approval, which adds mid-life repair and recertification options. In June 2025, Safran and REVIMA renewed spare parts and technical support terms across Airbus platforms, which strengthens repair execution depth. A key risk is environmental compliance cost, especially in plating and surface processes.

Aspirants

APPH Limited

Design authority is hard to replace once it is embedded in a landing gear architecture. APPH states it designs and produces landing gear systems for civil airliners and business jets, alongside military programs, which implies cross-platform engineering depth. Its upside would come from more outsourced repair engineering work when operators face obsolescence or corrosion driven part replacements. A downside scenario is constrained scale when multiple fleets enter heavy overhaul windows at the same time. Environmental compliance around chrome processes can also raise unit cost if approved alternatives are not qualified fast enough.

Aspirants

Sika Interplant Systems Limited

Regulatory licensed repair work can change customer access faster than organic selling ever could. Sika Interplant Systems entered a license agreement with Collins related entities in June 2025 to perform MRO for specific primary flight control actuation part numbers that are standard on Airbus A320 and A321 aircraft, with coverage for India and select neighboring countries. While this is not the landing gear itself, it strengthens credibility in safety critical actuation repair workflows that buyers often expect from landing gear providers too. The upside is faster qualification of adjacent actuation work and tighter turnaround control. The main risk is execution discipline under OEM oversight, where audit findings can quickly pause approvals.

Aspirants

Commercial Aircraft Landing Gear Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

Top 5 Commercial Aircraft Landing Gear Companies

Commercial Aircraft Landing Gear Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

MI Competitive Matrix for Commercial Aircraft Landing Gear

Analysis of Commercial Aircraft Landing Gear Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Safran SA

Collins Aerospace (RTX Corporation)

Liebherr Group

Hroux-Devtek Inc.

Eaton Corporation plc

Triumph Group, Inc.

GKN Aerospace (GKN plc)

Honeywell International Inc.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Crane Aerospace & Electronics (Crane Company)

Moog Inc.

Sumitomo Precision Products Co., Ltd.

CIRCOR International, Inc.

Magellan Aerospace Corporation

REVIMA Group

APPH Limited

Sika Interplant Systems Limited

Frequently Asked Questions

Methodology

Analysis of Leading Commercial Aircraft Landing Gear Companies