Blood Bags Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

Blood bags suppliers like Terumo Corporation, Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA, and Haemonetics Corporation compete via global supply chains, product innovation, and robust safety protocols. Our analysts highlight how leading firms differentiate by enhancing technology and forming specialized partnerships. For more insights on procurement and evolving strategies, see the full details in our Blood Bags Report.

KEY PLAYERS
Terumo MacoPharma Fresenius Haemonetics Corporation Kawasumi Laboratories
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 Blood Bags Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    Terumo

  • arrow

    MacoPharma

  • arrow

    Fresenius

  • arrow

    Haemonetics Corporation

  • arrow

    Kawasumi Laboratories

Top Blood Bags Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Blood Bags Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Blood Bags players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

These MI Matrix results can differ from simple revenue ordering because they reward dependable in country availability, validated product breadth, and recent execution signals. They also reflect how well each company supports blood banks and hospitals with consistent labeling, audit readiness, and documented quality systems. Blood bag buyers often look for three proof points: ISO 3826 aligned performance expectations, smooth leukoreduction integration, and predictable lead times under surge demand. Many teams also ask whether DEHP free transitions will force re validation, and which suppliers can keep component quality stable while switching materials. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone, because it weights real operating signals that affect patient safety and day to day continuity.

MI Competitive Matrix for Blood Bags

The MI Matrix benchmarks top Blood Bags Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of Blood Bags Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA

Rapid product renewal in transfusion prep sets Fresenius apart, supported by the CompoFlow and CompoFlex blood bag system line for component preparation. The group's 2024 disclosures also emphasize blood collection and processing devices plus tighter barcode discipline, aligning with rising traceability expectations. If DEHP constraints tighten faster in Europe and select US states, Fresenius Kabi can shift demand toward validated alternatives and keep hospital workflows stable. Execution complexity across many sites is a key risk, because any quality deviation can trigger costly removals and customer switching.

Leaders

Terumo Corporation

Automation pull through is strengthening Terumo's position with blood centers that want higher yields and fewer manual steps. Terumo BCT, a leading player in this space, pairs Teruflex bag systems with broader processing platforms like Reveos, including a first US deployment at Carter BloodCare in 2025. Regulation focused on donor safety and traceability favors integrated sampling, safety features, and consistent labeling across bag sets. If labor shortages worsen, Terumo is well placed to bundle bags, devices, and software into standardized workflows. The biggest operational risk is service continuity across installed systems, since downtime hits inventory and trust quickly.

Leaders

Macopharma SA

Portfolio breadth in filtration plus blood bag sets gives Macopharma a practical edge when buyers standardize leukoreduction and specialty processing. In late 2024, Macopharma acquired Lmb Technologie to deepen equipment and software coverage that sits next to single use kits. That move can help defend installed workflows as hospitals push for fewer manual handoffs and clearer chain of custody. If cord blood and cell processing volumes rise, Macopharma's specialty bag formats can scale without a full platform swap. Integration drag is the main risk, where service quality can slip while teams align product roadmaps and support models.

Leaders

Haemonetics Corporation

Visible pivot away from conventional whole blood assets changes how buyers should read Haemonetics in bag based workflows. In early 2025, it completed the sale of its whole blood assets to GVS while stating continued focus on apheresis solutions for automated collection. That strategy can pay off if platelet and plasma collection continues shifting toward automated methods with tight quality requirements. It also reduces direct exposure to bag quality failures that lead to recalls and write offs. The risk is revenue concentration in fewer product families, where a competitor win or a regulatory delay can hit results fast.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

How should hospitals choose between single, double, triple, and quadruple bag sets?

Match the set to your component split and staffing model. More compartments can reduce handling steps, but validation and training needs rise.

What matters most when switching from DEHP PVC to DEHP free materials?

Ask for validated component quality data and documented change control. Also confirm your local regulator accepts the updated material file.

When is an in line leukoreduction option worth paying for?

It is most valuable when you standardize leukoreduced components and want fewer open steps. It can also reduce variability across shifts.

What are the most common operational failure points with blood bags?

Labeling errors, seal integrity issues, and tubing kinks show up often in complaints. Build incoming inspection checks around these points.

How do blood services evaluate traceability readiness for bag systems?

They look for scan friendly labels, consistent lot and expiry formatting, and documentation that supports audits. Integration with inventory software helps.

What early signals suggest a supplier may struggle with continuity?

Frequent back orders, inconsistent documents, and slow complaint closure are warning signs. Limited local inventory buffers also raise risk during spikes.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

Evidence was taken primarily from company filings, investor relations updates, product documentation, and credible regulatory or standards bodies. Private firms were assessed using observable signals like certifications, catalog breadth, and documented channel presence. When direct segment financials were not available, multiple indicators were triangulated to avoid over relying on a single metric. Scoring reflects only the defined scope and geographies.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence & Reach

Blood centers qualify suppliers locally, so registered SKUs and service coverage drive repeat purchasing and tender wins.

2
Brand Authority

Transfusion committees favor trusted bag performance histories because failures can trigger discards, investigations, and immediate supplier switches.

3
Share

Higher in scope volume usually signals preferred bag sets, validated lines, and procurement leverage with large blood services.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operational Scale

Cleanroom capacity, tooling breadth, and validated sterilization determine lead times for multi bag sets and filter integrated systems.

2
Innovation & Product Range

New top and bottom sets, leukoreduction integration, and traceability friendly labeling since 2023 improve workflow and reduce errors.

3
Financial Health / Momentum

Stable funding supports inventory buffers, validation for DEHP free materials, and rapid response during shortages or recalls.