| Study Period | 2017 - 2030 |
| Base Year For Estimation | 2024 |
| Forecast Data Period | 2025 - 2030 |
| Market Size (2025) | USD 399.9 Million |
| Market Size (2030) | USD 636.6 Million |
| CAGR (2025 - 2030) | 9.74 % |
| Market Concentration | Low |
Major Players
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order |
Azotobacter Market Analysis
The Azotobacter Market size is estimated at 399.9 million USD in 2025, and is expected to reach 636.6 million USD by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 9.74% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
The Azotobacter market is experiencing significant transformation driven by the global shift towards sustainable agricultural practices and environmental conservation. The agricultural sector is increasingly adopting biological alternatives to chemical fertilizers, with Azotobacter emerging as a key solution for nitrogen fixation. This trend is particularly evident in the organic farming sector, where the total global organic agricultural land reached 72.3 million hectares in 2021. The rising awareness about soil health and environmental sustainability has led to increased adoption of biological nitrogen fixation methods, with Azotobacter being recognized as an effective alternative to synthetic nitrogen fertilizers.
Technological advancements in biofertilizer production and application methods have significantly enhanced the efficacy of Azotobacter-based products. Modern biotechnology techniques have improved strain selection and formulation processes, resulting in more stable and effective products. The integration of precision agriculture techniques with biofertilizer application has optimized product usage and improved crop yields. Row crops have emerged as the primary application area, accounting for 76.9% of the Azotobacter market in 2022, demonstrating the successful adaptation of these technologies in large-scale farming operations.
Government initiatives worldwide are playing a crucial role in promoting the adoption of biofertilizers. Japan's ambitious Basic Plan for Food, Agriculture, and Rural Areas aims to triple the number of organic farmers and lands by 2030, creating significant opportunities for Azotobacter-based products. In India, the National Mission on Oilseeds and Oil Palm (NMOOP) provides a 50% subsidy (INR 300/ha) for biofertilizers, including Azotobacter applications, demonstrating strong governmental support for sustainable agricultural practices. These policy initiatives are creating a favorable environment for market expansion and technological innovation in the biofertilizer sector.
The market is witnessing a paradigm shift in fertilizer usage patterns, particularly in regions with historically high chemical fertilizer consumption. China, currently the world's largest nitrogen fertilizer consumer, is implementing fertilizer policy reforms to address environmental concerns and promote sustainable alternatives. The agricultural sector's growing recognition of the need to balance productivity with environmental sustainability has led to increased interest in Azotobacter-based solutions. This shift is supported by research demonstrating Azotobacter's ability to reduce chemical fertilizer requirements while maintaining or improving crop yields, particularly in non-leguminous crops, which represent a significant portion of global agricultural production.
Global Azotobacter Market Trends
Organic production is at an all-time high in North America and Europe, due to the increasing awareness and Government initiatives.
- Organic agriculture has emerged as a significant contributor to sustainable food systems, with 187 countries practicing it globally. As of 2021, there was 72.3 million ha of organic agricultural land worldwide, with an average increase of 2.9% across all regions from 2018 to 2021. Organic arable land accounted for 14.4 million ha, representing 19.9% of the total organic agricultural land.
- The strongest markets for organic farming are North America and Europe, accounting for 41.0% of the global organic arable land. In 2022, Europe had 6.5 million ha of organic arable land, equivalent to 44.1% of the overall organic arable agricultural area. The most significant crops grown organically in North America and Europe are apples, strawberries, cereals, and olives.
- Developing countries in Asia-Pacific are also joining the organic agriculture movement and becoming self-sufficient in producing and providing fresh organic produce to meet their domestic demand. The trend of organic farming is gaining momentum in Asia-Pacific, with the region recording an 18.8% increase in organic arable land from 2017 to 2022. The major initiatives by governments in the region also play a vital role in the growing trend of organic farming. For example, Japan's Basic Plan for Food, Agriculture, and Rural Areas aims to triple the number of organic farmers and lands by 2030.
- The growth of organic agriculture is driven by the rising awareness of the benefits of organic farming, such as promoting soil health, reducing environmental impacts, and producing healthier food.
Understand The Key Trends Shaping This Market
Download PDF
Per capita spending of organic food majorly observed in United States and Germany, attributed to the consumer demand for healthier and sustainable food
- The organic food market experienced significant growth in the past few years, with global sales reaching USD 120.6 billion in 2020, up from USD 70.8 billion in 2012. The trend toward organic food is being driven by several factors, such as increasing consumer demand for healthier, more sustainable food options and a growing awareness of the environmental impact of conventional agriculture. The global organic food market is expected to continue its growth trend over the coming years.
- According to a survey conducted by the Organic Trade Association in 2021, sales of organic fruits and vegetables increased by around 4.5% in the same year, accounting for 15% of the overall organic sales. North America dominates the market in terms of average spending on organic products, with per capita spending in the United States reaching USD 186.7 in 2021, the highest among all North American countries. Europe is also expected to experience significant growth in the organic food market, with Germany accounting for the highest per capita spending of USD 75.6 in 2021.
- While the organic food market is still dominated by developed countries with high consumer disposable incomes, it is also expected to grow in developing nations. For example, the increasing number of working-class people in the Asia-Pacific region may contribute to the market's expansion due to the growing availability and affordability of organic food products.
Segment Analysis: Crop Type
Row Crops Segment in Azotobacter Market
Row crops dominate the global Azotobacter market, accounting for approximately 77% of the total market value in 2024. This significant market share is primarily attributed to the extensive application of Azotobacter biofertilizers in major row crops like paddy, wheat, millets, cotton, tomato, cabbage, mustard, safflower, and sunflower. The Asia-Pacific region, particularly China and India, leads the consumption of Azotobacter in row crops, with these two countries accounting for about 95% of Asia-Pacific's total organic row crop cultivation area. The segment's dominance is further strengthened by the ability of Azotobacter to fix approximately 20 kg of nitrogen per hectare, making it an excellent alternative to chemical nitrogen fertilizers in crop production. Additionally, row crops demonstrate higher nitrogen requirements compared to other crop types, leading to increased adoption of Azotobacter-based biofertilizers in this segment.
Growth Trajectory of Row Crops Segment
The row crops segment is projected to maintain its strong growth momentum with an estimated CAGR of nearly 10% during 2024-2029. This robust growth is driven by multiple factors, including the increasing adoption of sustainable farming practices, rising environmental concerns about chemical fertilizer usage, and growing organic row crop cultivation globally. The segment's growth is particularly supported by government initiatives to reduce synthetic fertilizer usage and promote organic farming methods. The effectiveness of Azotobacter in improving soil fertility and crop productivity, while simultaneously reducing the dependency on chemical fertilizers by 10-20% under typical field conditions, is expected to further accelerate its adoption in row crop cultivation during the forecast period.
Remaining Segments in Crop Type
The horticultural crops and cash crops segments complement the Azotobacter market with their unique applications and benefits. The horticultural crops segment, which includes fruits and vegetables, leverages Azotobacter's ability to enhance fruit yield, quality, and nutritional content while promoting root development and mineral absorption. The cash crops segment, encompassing crops like coffee, tea, cocoa, cotton, and sugarcane, benefits from Azotobacter's nitrogen-fixing bacteria capabilities and its role in producing growth-promoting substances. Both segments are witnessing increased adoption of Azotobacter bacterial biofertilizers as part of sustainable agricultural practices and organic farming initiatives worldwide.
Azotobacter Market Geography Segment Analysis
Azotobacter Market in Africa
The African Azotobacter market demonstrates significant potential across its key markets, including Egypt, Nigeria, and South Africa. The region's agricultural sector is experiencing a transformation with increasing adoption of organic farming practices and sustainable agricultural solutions. Each country presents unique opportunities and challenges in the adoption of Azotobacter-based biofertilizers, influenced by their respective agricultural policies, farming practices, and environmental conditions.
Azotobacter Market in Egypt
Egypt emerges as the dominant force in the African Azotobacter market, holding approximately 40% share in 2024. The country's leadership position is attributed to its well-developed organic farming sector, particularly in horticultural crops where vegetables, fruits, and medicinal plants constitute significant portions of organic cultivation. Egypt's strategic focus on sustainable agriculture and the growing awareness among farmers about the benefits of biological nitrogen fixation have contributed to its market dominance.
Azotobacter Market in South Africa
South Africa demonstrates remarkable growth potential in the Azotobacter market, with an expected growth rate of approximately 9% between 2024 and 2029. The country's progress is driven by its diverse agricultural industry, spanning both large corporate and small private farms producing a wide range of organic products. The increasing demand for organic foods both in domestic and international markets, coupled with growing awareness among farmers about the negative impacts of chemical inputs, continues to drive market expansion.
Azotobacter Market in Asia-Pacific
The Asia-Pacific region represents a crucial market for Azotobacter biofertilizers, encompassing major agricultural economies such as China, India, Australia, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. The region's market is characterized by diverse agricultural practices, varying levels of organic farming adoption, and increasing government initiatives to promote sustainable agriculture. The transition toward organic farming practices and the growing awareness about environmental sustainability continue to shape market dynamics across these countries.
Azotobacter Market in China
China dominates the Asia-Pacific Azotobacter market, commanding approximately 44% of the regional market share in 2024. The country's leadership is supported by its extensive organic cultivation area and strong agricultural infrastructure. China's commitment to sustainable farming practices and the implementation of supportive policies for organic agriculture have established it as the cornerstone of the regional market.
Azotobacter Market in India
India exhibits the most promising growth trajectory in the Asia-Pacific region, with a projected growth rate of approximately 10% between 2024 and 2029. The country's market expansion is driven by increasing organic farming initiatives, government support for sustainable agriculture, and growing awareness about the benefits of biological nitrogen fixation. India's diverse agricultural landscape and the rising demand for organic products continue to fuel market growth.
Azotobacter Market in Europe
The European Azotobacter market encompasses a diverse range of countries, including France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Russia, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The region's market is characterized by advanced agricultural practices, strong regulatory frameworks, and high adoption rates of organic farming methods. The European Union's emphasis on sustainable agriculture and environmental protection has created a favorable environment for Azotobacter-based biofertilizers.
Azotobacter Market in France
France stands as the leading market for Azotobacter in Europe, driven by its extensive organic farming sector and advanced agricultural practices. The country's strong focus on eco-friendly farming techniques and approaches, coupled with robust research and development activities in agricultural biologicals, has established it as a key market in the region.
Azotobacter Market in Germany
Germany demonstrates the most dynamic growth potential in the European market, supported by its ambitious organic farming goals and strong environmental policies. The country's commitment to converting a significant portion of its agricultural land to organic farming, coupled with increasing consumer demand for organic products, drives market expansion.
Azotobacter Market in Middle East
The Middle Eastern Azotobacter market, primarily represented by Iran and Saudi Arabia, shows significant potential for growth. Saudi Arabia emerges as the largest market in the region, while Iran demonstrates the fastest growth potential. The region's increasing focus on organic farming practices and government initiatives to reduce chemical fertilizer usage are driving market development.
Azotobacter Market in North America
The North American market, comprising the United States, Canada, and Mexico, represents a significant segment of the global Azotobacter market. The United States leads the regional market, while also showing the highest growth potential. The region's strong focus on sustainable agriculture, advanced farming practices, and increasing organic acreage continues to drive market expansion.
Azotobacter Market in South America
The South American Azotobacter market, primarily driven by Brazil and Argentina, demonstrates robust growth potential. Brazil emerges as the dominant market in the region, while Argentina shows the fastest growth trajectory. The region's expanding organic farming sector and increasing awareness about sustainable agricultural practices continue to shape market dynamics.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF
Azotobacter Industry Overview
Top Companies in Azotobacter Market
The azotobacter market is characterized by companies focusing on expanding their product portfolios through research and development initiatives aimed at improving nitrogen fixation capabilities and soil health benefits. Market leaders are investing in developing innovative formulations with enhanced shelf life and efficacy across different crop types. Companies are strengthening their distribution networks and establishing partnerships with agricultural institutions and universities for product development and testing. Strategic moves include expanding manufacturing capacities, particularly in regions with growing organic farming adoption. Operational agility is demonstrated through customized product development based on specific soil and crop requirements, while companies are also investing in farmer education and training programs to promote sustainable farming practices.
Market Led By Established Agricultural Players
The agricultural biological market structure is characterized by a mix of large agricultural input companies and specialized biofertilizer manufacturers. Major agricultural cooperatives and state-owned enterprises, particularly in Asia-Pacific, hold significant market positions due to their established distribution networks and government support. The market remains relatively fragmented with numerous regional players serving local markets, though consolidation is gradually increasing as larger companies acquire specialized biofertilizer manufacturers to expand their biological portfolio. The competitive landscape is particularly intense in regions with high organic farming adoption, where companies compete through product differentiation and technical support services.
Market dynamics are influenced by the strong presence of domestic manufacturers in key markets like India and China, where local companies leverage their understanding of regional agricultural practices and farmer relationships. While global agricultural input companies are expanding their presence in the agricultural microbial market, specialized manufacturers maintain their competitive edge through focused research and development in microbial technologies. The market shows limited merger and acquisition activity, with companies preferring strategic partnerships and joint ventures to expand their geographical presence and technical capabilities.
Innovation and Distribution Drive Market Success
Success in the azotobacter market increasingly depends on companies' ability to develop products with proven efficacy across diverse agricultural conditions and crop types. Market incumbents need to focus on strengthening their research and development capabilities while expanding their distribution reach through partnerships with agricultural input distributors and farmer cooperatives. Companies must invest in technical support services and demonstration programs to build farmer confidence in biological products. Additionally, maintaining product quality and stability while scaling up production remains crucial for market success.
Future growth opportunities lie in developing integrated biological solutions that combine azotobacter with other beneficial microorganisms. Companies need to focus on building strong relationships with organic farming communities and certification bodies to establish credibility in the growing organic agriculture sector. The regulatory environment, particularly in developed markets, is becoming more supportive of biological alternatives to chemical fertilizers, creating opportunities for companies with proven product efficacy and safety data. Market contenders can gain ground by focusing on underserved regional markets and crop segments while investing in innovative formulation technologies to improve product performance and ease of use.
Azotobacter Market Leaders
-
Green Vision Life Sciences
-
Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd
-
Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited
-
National Fertilizers Limited
-
T.Stanes and Company Limited
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Need More Details on Market Players and Competiters?
Download PDF
Free With This Report
Along with the report, We also offer a comprehensive and exhaustive data pack on Areas under organic cultivation, one of the key trends that affect the market size of agricultural biologicals. This data pack also includes areas under cultivation by crop types, such as Row Crops (Cereals, Pulses, and Oilseeds), Horticultural Crops (Fruits and Vegetables), and Cash Crops in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America and Africa.
Azotobacter Market Report - Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & KEY FINDINGS
2. REPORT OFFERS
3. INTRODUCTION
- 3.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
- 3.2 Scope of the Study
- 3.3 Research Methodology
4. KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS
- 4.1 Area Under Organic Cultivation
- 4.2 Per Capita Spending On Organic Products
-
4.3 Regulatory Framework
- 4.3.1 Argentina
- 4.3.2 Australia
- 4.3.3 Brazil
- 4.3.4 Canada
- 4.3.5 China
- 4.3.6 Egypt
- 4.3.7 France
- 4.3.8 Germany
- 4.3.9 India
- 4.3.10 Indonesia
- 4.3.11 Italy
- 4.3.12 Japan
- 4.3.13 Mexico
- 4.3.14 Netherlands
- 4.3.15 Nigeria
- 4.3.16 Philippines
- 4.3.17 Russia
- 4.3.18 South Africa
- 4.3.19 Spain
- 4.3.20 Thailand
- 4.3.21 Turkey
- 4.3.22 United Kingdom
- 4.3.23 United States
- 4.3.24 Vietnam
- 4.4 Value Chain & Distribution Channel Analysis
5. MARKET SEGMENTATION (includes market size in Value in USD and Volume, Forecasts up to 2030 and analysis of growth prospects)
-
5.1 Crop Type
- 5.1.1 Cash Crops
- 5.1.2 Horticultural Crops
- 5.1.3 Row Crops
-
5.2 Region
- 5.2.1 Africa
- 5.2.1.1 By Country
- 5.2.1.1.1 Egypt
- 5.2.1.1.2 Nigeria
- 5.2.1.1.3 South Africa
- 5.2.1.1.4 Rest of Africa
- 5.2.2 Asia-Pacific
- 5.2.2.1 By Country
- 5.2.2.1.1 Australia
- 5.2.2.1.2 China
- 5.2.2.1.3 India
- 5.2.2.1.4 Indonesia
- 5.2.2.1.5 Japan
- 5.2.2.1.6 Philippines
- 5.2.2.1.7 Thailand
- 5.2.2.1.8 Vietnam
- 5.2.2.1.9 Rest of Asia-Pacific
- 5.2.3 Europe
- 5.2.3.1 By Country
- 5.2.3.1.1 France
- 5.2.3.1.2 Germany
- 5.2.3.1.3 Italy
- 5.2.3.1.4 Netherlands
- 5.2.3.1.5 Russia
- 5.2.3.1.6 Spain
- 5.2.3.1.7 Turkey
- 5.2.3.1.8 United Kingdom
- 5.2.3.1.9 Rest of Europe
- 5.2.4 Middle East
- 5.2.4.1 By Country
- 5.2.4.1.1 Iran
- 5.2.4.1.2 Saudi Arabia
- 5.2.4.1.3 Rest of Middle East
- 5.2.5 North America
- 5.2.5.1 By Country
- 5.2.5.1.1 Canada
- 5.2.5.1.2 Mexico
- 5.2.5.1.3 United States
- 5.2.5.1.4 Rest of North America
- 5.2.6 South America
- 5.2.6.1 By Country
- 5.2.6.1.1 Argentina
- 5.2.6.1.2 Brazil
- 5.2.6.1.3 Rest of South America
6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
- 6.1 Key Strategic Moves
- 6.2 Market Share Analysis
- 6.3 Company Landscape
-
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Business Segments, Financials, Headcount, Key Information, Market Rank, Market Share, Products and Services, and Analysis of Recent Developments).
- 6.4.1 Ezzy Bioscience Pvt. Ltd
- 6.4.2 Green Vision Life Sciences
- 6.4.3 Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd
- 6.4.4 Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited
- 6.4.5 Indogulf BioAg LLC (Biotech Division of Indogulf Company)
- 6.4.6 IPL Biologicals Limited
- 6.4.7 Jaipur Bio Fertilizers
- 6.4.8 National Fertilizers Limited
- 6.4.9 Samriddhi Crops India Pvt. Ltd
- 6.4.10 T.Stanes and Company Limited
7. KEY STRATEGIC QUESTIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS CEOS
8. APPENDIX
-
8.1 Global Overview
- 8.1.1 Overview
- 8.1.2 Porter’s Five Forces Framework
- 8.1.3 Global Value Chain Analysis
- 8.1.4 Market Dynamics (DROs)
- 8.2 Sources & References
- 8.3 List of Tables & Figures
- 8.4 Primary Insights
- 8.5 Data Pack
- 8.6 Glossary of Terms
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now
List of Tables & Figures
- Figure 1:
- AREA UNDER ORGANIC CULTIVATION IN HECTARES, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 2:
- PER CAPITA SPENDING ON ORGANIC PRODUCTS IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 3:
- GLOBAL AZOTOBACTER MARKET, VOLUME, METRIC TON, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 4:
- GLOBAL AZOTOBACTER MARKET, VALUE, USD, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 5:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 6:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 7:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY CROP TYPE IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 8:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 9:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION BY CASH CROPS IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 10:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION BY CASH CROPS IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 11:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY REGION IN %, GLOBAL, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 12:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 13:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 14:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY REGION IN %, GLOBAL, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 15:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION BY ROW CROPS IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 16:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION BY ROW CROPS IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 17:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY REGION IN %, GLOBAL, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 18:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 19:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 20:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY REGION IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 21:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY REGION IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 22:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 23:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 24:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, AFRICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 25:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, AFRICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 26:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EGYPT, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 27:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EGYPT, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 28:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EGYPT, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 29:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NIGERIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 30:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NIGERIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 31:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NIGERIA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 32:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SOUTH AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 33:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, SOUTH AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 34:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, SOUTH AFRICA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 35:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 36:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 37:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, REST OF AFRICA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 38:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 39:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 40:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 41:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 42:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, AUSTRALIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 43:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, AUSTRALIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 44:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, AUSTRALIA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 45:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, CHINA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 46:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, CHINA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 47:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, CHINA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 48:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2016 - 2029
- Figure 49:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2016 - 2029
- Figure 50:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 51:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDONESIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 52:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDONESIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 53:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDONESIA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 54:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, JAPAN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 55:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, JAPAN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 56:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, JAPAN, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 57:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, PHILIPPINES, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 58:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, PHILIPPINES, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 59:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, PHILIPPINES, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 60:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, THAILAND, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 61:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, THAILAND, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 62:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, THAILAND, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 63:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, VIETNAM, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 64:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, VIETNAM, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 65:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, VIETNAM, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 66:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 67:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 68:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 69:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 70:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 71:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 72:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 73:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, FRANCE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 74:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, FRANCE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 75:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, FRANCE, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 76:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GERMANY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 77:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, GERMANY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 78:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, GERMANY, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 79:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, ITALY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 80:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, ITALY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 81:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, ITALY, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 82:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NETHERLANDS, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 83:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NETHERLANDS, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 84:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NETHERLANDS, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 85:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, RUSSIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 86:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, RUSSIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 87:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, RUSSIA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 88:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SPAIN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 89:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, SPAIN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 90:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, SPAIN, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 91:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, TURKEY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 92:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, TURKEY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 93:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, TURKEY, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 94:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED KINGDOM, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 95:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED KINGDOM, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 96:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED KINGDOM, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 97:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 98:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 99:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, REST OF EUROPE, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 100:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, MIDDLE EAST, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 101:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, MIDDLE EAST, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 102:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, MIDDLE EAST, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 103:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, MIDDLE EAST, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 104:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, IRAN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 105:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, IRAN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 106:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, IRAN, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 107:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SAUDI ARABIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 108:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, SAUDI ARABIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 109:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, SAUDI ARABIA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 110:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF MIDDLE EAST, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 111:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF MIDDLE EAST, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 112:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, REST OF MIDDLE EAST, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 113:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 114:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 115:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 116:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 117:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, CANADA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 118:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, CANADA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 119:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, CANADA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 120:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, MEXICO, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 121:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, MEXICO, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 122:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, MEXICO, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 123:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 124:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 125:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 126:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 127:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 128:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 129:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 130:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 131:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 132:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 133:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, ARGENTINA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 134:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, ARGENTINA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 135:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, ARGENTINA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 136:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, BRAZIL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 137:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, BRAZIL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 138:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, BRAZIL, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 139:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 140:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 141:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, REST OF SOUTH AMERICA, 2021 VS 2028
- Figure 142:
- GLOBAL AZOTOBACTER MARKET, MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES, BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, 2017-2022
- Figure 143:
- GLOBAL AZOTOBACTER MARKET, MOST ADOPTED STRATEGIES, 2017-2022
- Figure 144:
- GLOBAL AZOTOBACTER MARKET SHARE(%), BY MAJOR PLAYERS
Azotobacter Industry Segmentation
Cash Crops, Horticultural Crops, Row Crops are covered as segments by Crop Type. Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, Middle East, North America, South America are covered as segments by Region.| Crop Type | Cash Crops | |||
| Horticultural Crops | ||||
| Row Crops | ||||
| Region | Africa | By Country | Egypt | |
| Nigeria | ||||
| South Africa | ||||
| Rest of Africa | ||||
| Asia-Pacific | By Country | Australia | ||
| China | ||||
| India | ||||
| Indonesia | ||||
| Japan | ||||
| Philippines | ||||
| Thailand | ||||
| Vietnam | ||||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||||
| Europe | By Country | France | ||
| Germany | ||||
| Italy | ||||
| Netherlands | ||||
| Russia | ||||
| Spain | ||||
| Turkey | ||||
| United Kingdom | ||||
| Rest of Europe | ||||
| Middle East | By Country | Iran | ||
| Saudi Arabia | ||||
| Rest of Middle East | ||||
| North America | By Country | Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||||
| United States | ||||
| Rest of North America | ||||
| South America | By Country | Argentina | ||
| Brazil | ||||
| Rest of South America | ||||
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now
Market Definition
- AVERAGE DOSAGE RATE - The average application rate is the average volume of Azotobacter applied per hectare of farmland in the respective region/country.
- CROP TYPE - Crop type includes Row crops (Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds), Horticultural Crops (Fruits and vegetables) and Cash Crops (Plantation Crops, Fibre Crops and Other Industrial Crops)
- FUNCTION - The crop nutrition function of agricultural biological consists of various products that provide essential plant nutrients and enhance soil quality.
- TYPE - Azotobacter are beneficial microorganisms that help crops in Biological Nitrogen Fixation (BNF) and secretion of various plant hormones that boost crop growth and yield.
| Keyword | Definition |
|---|---|
| Cash Crops | Cash crops are non-consumable crops sold as a whole or part of the crop to manufacture end-products to make a profit. |
| Integrated Pest Management (IPM) | IPM is an environment-friendly and sustainable approach to control pests in various crops. It involves a combination of methods, including biological controls, cultural practices, and selective use of pesticides. |
| Bacterial biocontrol agents | Bacteria used to control pests and diseases in crops. They work by producing toxins harmful to the target pests or competing with them for nutrients and space in the growing environment. Some examples of commonly used bacterial biocontrol agents include Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Streptomyces spp. |
| Plant Protection Product (PPP) | A plant protection product is a formulation applied to crops to protect from pests, such as weeds, diseases, or insects. They contain one or more active substances with other co-formulants such as solvents, carriers, inert material, wetting agents or adjuvants formulated to give optimum product efficacy. |
| Pathogen | A pathogen is an organism causing disease to its host, with the severity of the disease symptoms. |
| Parasitoids | Parasitoids are insects that lay their eggs on or within the host insect, with their larvae feeding on the host insect. In agriculture, parasitoids can be used as a form of biological pest control, as they help to control pest damage to crops and decrease the need for chemical pesticides. |
| Entomopathogenic Nematodes (EPN) | Entomopathogenic nematodes are parasitic roundworms that infect and kill pests by releasing bacteria from their gut. Entomopathogenic nematodes are a form of biocontrol agents used in agriculture. |
| Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM) | VAM fungi are mycorrhizal species of fungus. They live in the roots of different higher-order plants. They develop a symbiotic relationship with the plants in the roots of these plants. |
| Fungal biocontrol agents | Fungal biocontrol agents are the beneficial fungi that control plant pests and diseases. They are an alternative to chemical pesticides. They infect and kill the pests or compete with pathogenic fungi for nutrients and space. |
| Biofertilizers | Biofertilizers contain beneficial microorganisms that enhance soil fertility and promote plant growth. |
| Biopesticides | Biopesticides are natural/bio-based compounds used to manage agricultural pests using specific biological effects. |
| Predators | Predators in agriculture are the organisms that feed on pests and help control pest damage to the crops. Some common predator species used in agriculture include ladybugs, lacewings, and predatory mites. |
| Biocontrol agents | Biocontrol agents are living organisms used to control pests and diseases in agriculture. They are alternatives to chemical pesticides and are known for their lesser impact on the environment and human health. |
| Organic Fertilizers | Organic fertilizer is composed of animal or vegetable matter used alone or in combination with one or more non-synthetically derived elements or compounds used for soil fertility and plant growth. |
| Protein hydrolysates (PHs) | Protein hydrolysate-based biostimulants contain free amino acids, oligopeptides, and polypeptides produced by enzymatic or chemical hydrolysis of proteins, primarily from vegetal or animal sources. |
| Biostimulants/Plant Growth Regulators (PGR) | Biostimulants/Plant Growth Regulators (PGR) are substances derived from natural resources to enhance plant growth and health by stimulating plant processes (metabolism). |
| Soil Amendments | Soil Amendments are substances applied to soil that improve soil health, such as soil fertility and soil structure. |
| Seaweed Extract | Seaweed extracts are rich in micro and macronutrients, proteins, polysaccharides, polyphenols, phytohormones, and osmolytes. These substances boost seed germination and crop establishment, total plant growth and productivity. |
| Compounds related to biocontrol and/or promoting growth (CRBPG) | Compounds related to biocontrol or promoting growth (CRBPG) are the ability of a bacteria to produce compounds for phytopathogen biocontrol and plant growth promotion. |
| Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria | Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria such as Rhizobium obtain food and shelter from the host, and in return, they help by providing fixed nitrogen to the plants. |
| Nitrogen Fixation | Nitrogen fixation is a chemical process in soil which converts molecular nitrogen into ammonia or related nitrogenous compounds. |
| ARS (Agricultural Research Service) | ARS is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief scientific in-house research agency. It aims to find solutions to agricultural problems faced by the farmers in the country. |
| Phytosanitary Regulations | Phytosanitary regulations imposed by the respective government bodies check or prohibit the importation and marketing of certain insects, plant species, or products of these plants to prevent the introduction or spread of new plant pests or pathogens. |
| Ectomycorrhizae (ECM) | Ectomycorrhiza (ECM) is a symbiotic interaction of fungi with the feeder roots of higher plants in which both the plant and the fungi benefit through the association for survival. |
Need More Details on Market Definition?
Ask a Question
Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence follows a four-step methodology in all our reports.
- Step-1: Identify Key Variables: In order to build a robust forecasting methodology, the variables and factors identified in Step-1 are tested against available historical market numbers. Through an iterative process, the variables required for market forecast are set and the model is built on the basis of these variables.
- Step-2: Build a Market Model: Market-size estimations for the forecast years are in nominal terms. Inflation is not a part of the pricing, and the average selling price (ASP) is kept constant throughout the forecast period.
- Step-3: Validate and Finalize: In this important step, all market numbers, variables and analyst calls are validated through an extensive network of primary research experts from the market studied. The respondents are selected across levels and functions to generate a holistic picture of the market studied.
- Step-4: Research Outputs: Syndicated Reports, Custom Consulting Assignments, Databases & Subscription Platforms.
Get More Details On Research Methodology
Download PDF
