Top 5 Africa Fertilizers Companies
Yara International ASA
SABIC Agri-Nutrients Co.
ICL Group Ltd
K+S Aktiengesellschaft
Golden Fertilizer Company Limited

Source: Mordor Intelligence
Africa Fertilizers Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Africa Fertilizers players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can diverge from simple size rankings because it weighs Africa footprint, product fit, and delivery reliability alongside scale. It also considers whether recent capacity, ports, and channel actions improve real availability for farmers, not only production potential. Indicators that often separate firms include Africa warehousing depth, blend customization capability, consistency of shipping and inland logistics, and the ability to support dealers with agronomy and credit discipline. Africa's largest fertilizer production assets are concentrated in Morocco and Nigeria, so phosphate and urea shape the supply base. Buyers also screen for port access, bagging reliability, and last mile dealer reach because these factors often decide season success. Overall, this MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is a stronger tool for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it ties position to execution signals that buyers experience directly.
MI Competitive Matrix for Africa Fertilizers
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Africa Fertilizers Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Africa Fertilizers Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Yara International ASA
Resetting country focus has become a practical lever for Africa execution since 2024. Portfolio trimming, including the closing of its Ivory Coast divestment, has let the major player concentrate resources on fewer priority countries and crop systems. That supports deeper dealer coverage and more consistent agronomy support, yet it also raises the risk of gaps in smaller coastal import corridors. If subsidy rules tighten, the company can pivot to tailored blends and advisory led demand. The main operational exposure remains shipping volatility and local FX pressure.
OCP S.A.
Investment depth is shaping Africa supply resilience in phosphates. OCP, a leading producer of phosphate based fertilizers, set a 2023 to 2027 plan framed around higher production capacity, renewable power, and green ammonia inputs. That path can improve reliability for African demand surges tied to subsidy windows. If carbon rules expand for traded goods, the company can differentiate with lower emission inputs. The most material risk is execution pacing across energy, water, and new industrial assets, because delays would limit the expected cost and sustainability benefits.
Dangote Fertiliser Limited
Nigeria's urea scale is already changing trade flows for West Africa and beyond. Dangote Fertiliser, a major OEM in Africa, has a stated 3 million tonne per year urea facility and has publicly discussed plans that would require output to roughly double to meet a self sufficiency goal for the continent. If inland rail and port handling improve, this can reduce landed cost volatility for nearby countries. The central risk remains infrastructure, since congestion can erase plant gate advantages. One realistic upside scenario is deeper integration with blending and micronutrient add ons for domestic value capture.
Indorama Eleme Fertilizer & Chemicals Limited
New capacity financing is a strong signal when African fertilizer affordability remains fragile. Indorama Eleme is planning a third urea line, described at about 1.4 million metric tons per year, with public development bank financing support and a new export shipping terminal. This improves Nigeria's export reliability and can support regional supply balancing during peak seasons. If policy shifts toward port based controls, the terminal is a strategic hedge. The biggest operational risk is execution complexity across construction, gas feed, and port coordination.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should buyers verify first when selecting a fertilizer producer or blender in Africa?
Check product labeling, nutrient assay documentation, and batch traceability for every shipment. Confirm local storage conditions and bag integrity to avoid caking and nutrient loss.
When is a local blender preferable to an importer?
Local blenders can react faster to soil and crop specific formulations and smaller lot needs. Importers can be better for straight nutrients when port and inland transport are stable.
How do low carbon ammonia projects matter for Africa fertilizer procurement today?
They matter most for future compliance and for buyers with export linked supply chains. In the near term, price and delivery timing usually dominate decisions.
What are practical red flags in distributor networks?
Frequent stock outs during peak planting windows and unclear credit terms are common warning signs. Weak after sales agronomy support can also signal poor farmer outcomes and repeat demand risk.
How can governments reduce subsidy leakage while improving availability?
Use bonded warehousing, digital voucher systems, and tighter dealer accreditation. Pair distribution controls with training so products are applied correctly and on time.
What trends are raising execution risk for suppliers through 2026?
Port congestion, FX volatility, and higher cost of capital can reduce inventory build ahead of seasons. Climate swings also shift demand timing and increase credit defaults.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Used company releases, investor materials, development finance announcements, and credible journalism for 2023 and newer evidence. Private firm signals relied on observable assets, capacity statements, and documented programs. When Africa only data was limited, scoring used conservative proxies tied to Africa delivery pathways. Conflicts were triangulated by prioritizing primary and institutional sources.
Local blending, ports, warehouses, and dealer reach determine physical availability across Nigeria, South Africa, and the rest of Africa.
Trust affects tender wins, dealer pull, and willingness to pay for consistent nutrient quality and labeling compliance.
Higher Africa volumes typically bring freight leverage, better allocation priority, and steadier supply through the season.
Africa linked plants, blending lines, and terminals reduce reliance on uncertain import routes and improve season timing.
New low carbon ammonia, enhanced efficiency grades, and micronutrient led blends help meet policy goals and farmer yield targets.
Working capital strength supports inventory build ahead of subsidy seasons and reduces stock outs during logistics disruptions.
